Treatment of Osteoporosis - TOP1 Clinical Study (TOP1)

April 2, 2019 updated by: DALIBOR KRPAN, Polyclinic K-center

Treatment of Osteoporosis by Panaceo: Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled, Study Assessed Effect on Bone Mineral Density and Bone Turnover of Panaceo Compared to Placebo in Osteoporotic Patients

This study investigates the effect of zeolite on bone mineral metabolism. The clinical parameters include bone mineral density, bone remodelling markers, fractures and fallings, the subjective evaluation of the overall health status and intensity of the musculoskeletal pain measured by VAS.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. The Study lasts 12 months. Study Population: The study population will consist of 100 patients with osteoporosis defined according BMD (bone mineral density) criteria: T score -2, 5 on the femoral neck, and, or T -2, 5 on L1-L5, who has not been treated before, or in whom privies treatment did not been successful, despite a gender or age. Subjects will be randomized in each cohort to receive PMA-zeolite (Panaceo) or placebo (1:1). All of them will receive Vit D3 800 j daily.

The double blind design can be reached by a "third party blinding" where a qualified person, not being involved in the assessment of the study, will administer the study treatment.

Follow up DXA, Ca, P, ALP, Osteocalcin, Cross laps, Creatinin will be done to each subject before the treatment, 6 months later and after 12 months. IVA (vertebral deformity assessment) will be performed before the treatment and after 12 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

36 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 100 subjects with osteoporosis Among those, as a subgroup, 20 subjects with diabetes type 2 and osteoporosis

    • The osteoporosis- was diagnosed by standard DXA measurement (BMD T-score: - 2.5 or below )

Exclusion Criteria:

  • chronic renal failure, secondary osteoporosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: zeolite
50 subjects receive the substance 3 times per day as powder
given for a period of 12 months
Placebo Comparator: cellulose
50 subjects receive the substance 3 times per day as powder
given for a period of 12 months

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of BMD (Bone mineral density)
Time Frame: 0-6-12 months
BMD measurements are used to see how well osteoporosis treatments are working
0-6-12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cange of Bone remodelling marker Osteocalcin
Time Frame: 0-6-12 months
Osteocalcin- parameter of the bone formation rate
0-6-12 months
Cange of Bone remodelling marker Betacross laps
Time Frame: 0-6-12 months
Betacross laps - parameter of the bone degradation rate
0-6-12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fractures and fallings
Time Frame: 12 months
Fracture: evaluation if yes) or no) Falling: Fracture as a consequence OR no fracture OR no fallings reported
12 months
Intensity of the musculoskeletal pain measured by VAS
Time Frame: 0-12 months
the scale based on patient's subjective evaluation at the beginning and at the end of the study.
0-12 months
Subjective evaluation of the overall health status and 6.
Time Frame: 0-12 months
upon the end of the study in comparison to the beginning
0-12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 14, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 20, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

March 20, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 8, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • TOP 001-2013

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoporosis

Clinical Trials on zeolite

Subscribe