Home-based Family Caregiver-delivered Music and Reading Interventions for People With Dementia (HOMESIDE)

February 8, 2023 updated by: Anglia Ruskin University

HOMESIDE: Home-based Family Caregiver-delivered Music and Reading Interventions for People Living With Dementia: A Randomised Controlled Trial

This international study evaluates the impact of home-based caregiver-delivered music and reading interventions for people with dementia. The project aims to address the need for improved informal dementia care by training family caregivers to utilise a music or reading intervention with the person they are caring for. The interventions aim to decrease behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia as well as improve quality of life and well being of both people living with dementia and their caregivers. Participants will be allocated into a music intervention group, a reading intervention group or standard care group. In addition, the researchers will seek to determine the cost-effectiveness of using the music intervention.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This three-arm parallel-group randomised controlled trial will involve 495 couples (cohabiting caregivers and people with dementia) across 5 countries. Caregivers allocated to the music or reading intervention groups will be given three 2-hour training sessions in the allocated intervention. They will be asked to deliver the intervention to the person they are caring for 5x weekly for 3 months. Data will be collected prior to implementing the intervention, during the intervention (via diaries kept by the caregivers), after the last week of implementing the intervention and 3-months after implementing the intervention.

The investigators will explore whether caregiver-delivered music or reading activities improve behavioural and psychological symptoms for people living with dementia. The researchers will also seek to find out the impact on other aspects of both the person with dementia and their caregiver's quality of life and well being. Additionally, costs associated with the care of the person with dementia will be evaluated to determine cost-effectiveness of delivering a music intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

864

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Melbourne, Australia, 3006
        • The University of Melbourne
      • Würzburg, Germany, 97070
        • University of Applied Sciences Würzburg-Schweinfurt
      • Oslo, Norway, 0302
        • Norwegian Academy of Music
      • Kraków, Poland
        • University of Physical Education in Krakow
    • Cambridgeshire
      • Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom, CB1 1PT
        • Anglia Ruskin University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Dyads (cohabiting) who are close in relationship and where one member has a diagnosis of dementia according to ICD-10 criteria (Alzheimer's Disease [AD], Frontotemporal Dementia, Vascular Dementia [VD], Lewy Body Disease, or mixed dementia) as determined by a clinician experienced in diagnosing dementia. Close in relationship refers to a caregiver who may be a sibling, spouse, adult child, friend, niece or nephew or any person who has a close relationship to the person with dementia, that is, anyone who is not a formal paid caregiver.
  • Dyads where the person with dementia has a Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Questionnaire (NPI-Q) Score of ≥6 (from a maximum score of 36)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dyads where either or both the caregiver or person with dementia have significant hearing impairments that are not resolved through the use of a hearing aid device and limit their capacity to enjoy musical experiences
  • There will be no further exclusions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Music Intervention
The music intervention will be provided to participant dyads (people with dementia and their cohabiting family caregivers) allocated to the first intervention. Caregivers will be trained to use the music intervention in three 2-hour training sessions with an intervention trainer (a music therapist). Training will take place at the dyad's home. The caregiver will then be asked to deliver the music intervention to the person with dementia at least 5x per week for 30 minutes.
After training, caregivers will deliver the music intervention to the person with dementia whom they care for. The music intervention will include: a) singing familiar/preferred music followed by discussions facilitated by the caregiver about any associated meanings or memories; b) movement to music (e.g. upper body and arms imitating familiar dance movements to music); c) instrument playing; and d) listening to familiar/preferred relaxing or enlivening music (dependent upon symptoms present in the moment). These methods are known to assist in emotion regulation and increase cognitive reserve (e.g. attention and perceptual-motor function).
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Reading Intervention
The reading intervention will be provided to participant dyads (people with dementia and their cohabiting caregivers) allocated to the second intervention. Caregivers will be trained to use the reading intervention in three 2-hour training sessions with an intervention trainer. Training will take place at the dyad's home. The caregiver will then be asked to deliver the reading intervention to the person with dementia at least 5x per week for 30 minutes.
After training, caregivers will deliver the reading intervention to the person with dementia whom they care for. The reading intervention will include: a) the caregiver reading aloud to the person they are caring for; b) the person with dementia reading aloud to their caregiver; and c) discussion of the text and personal responses. Strategies to engage the person with dementia and to create opportunities for meaningful dialogue will be provided, as well as guidance on selecting reading material that is accessible to the person's level of cognitive impairment.
NO_INTERVENTION: Standard Care
Participant dyads (people with dementia and their cohabiting caregivers) allocated to the standard care group will not receive any training or be asked to deliver an intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline of behavioural and psychological symptoms of participants with dementia at post-intervention and 6-month follow-up
Time Frame: baseline, 12-weeks (primary time-point), and 6-months after intervention commencement (follow-up)
Measured by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q). Severity scores range from 0-36, where higher scores indicate more severe behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia. Distress scores range from 0-60, where higher values represent higher levels of distress due to symptoms.
baseline, 12-weeks (primary time-point), and 6-months after intervention commencement (follow-up)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline of depression in participants with dementia at post-intervention and 6-month follow-up
Time Frame: baseline, 12-weeks (primary time-point), and 6-months after intervention commencement (follow-up)
Measured by the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Scale scores range from 0-60, where higher scores indicate more severe depression.
baseline, 12-weeks (primary time-point), and 6-months after intervention commencement (follow-up)
Change from baseline of quality of life of participants with dementia at post-intervention and 6-month follow-up
Time Frame: baseline, 12-weeks (primary time-point), and 6-months after intervention commencement (follow-up)
Measured by the Quality of Life - Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD) scale. Scale scores range from 13-52, where higher scores indicate higher quality of life.
baseline, 12-weeks (primary time-point), and 6-months after intervention commencement (follow-up)
Change from baseline of depression in caregiver participants at post-intervention and 6-month follow-up
Time Frame: baseline, 12-weeks (primary time-point), and 6-months after intervention commencement (follow-up)
Measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Scale scores range from 0-27, where scores greater than 20 indicate severe depression.
baseline, 12-weeks (primary time-point), and 6-months after intervention commencement (follow-up)
Change from baseline of resilience in caregiver participants at post-intervention and 6-month follow-up
Time Frame: baseline, 12-weeks (primary time-point), and 6-months after intervention commencement (follow-up)
Measured by the Resilience Scale-14 (RS-14). Scale scores range from 14-98, where higher scores indicate higher resilience.
baseline, 12-weeks (primary time-point), and 6-months after intervention commencement (follow-up)
Change from baseline in caregiver competence of caregiver participants at post-intervention and 6-month follow-up
Time Frame: baseline, 12-weeks (primary time-point), and 6-months after intervention commencement (follow-up)
Measured by the Short Sense of Competence Questionnaire (SSCQ). Scale scores range from 7-35, where higher scores indicate higher sense of competence.
baseline, 12-weeks (primary time-point), and 6-months after intervention commencement (follow-up)
Change from baseline in quality of life of caregiver participants at post-intervention and 6-month follow-up
Time Frame: baseline, 12-weeks (primary time-point), and 6-months after intervention commencement (follow-up)
Measured by the Assessment of Quality of Life-6D (AQOL-6D).
baseline, 12-weeks (primary time-point), and 6-months after intervention commencement (follow-up)
Change from baseline in quality of the relationship between caregiver and person with dementia at post-intervention and 6-month follow-up
Time Frame: baseline, 12-weeks (primary time-point), and 6-months after intervention commencement (follow-up)
Measured by the Quality of Caregiver-Patient Relationship (QCPR). Scale scores range from 14-70, where higher scores indicate a higher quality of relationship.
baseline, 12-weeks (primary time-point), and 6-months after intervention commencement (follow-up)
Change from baseline in quality of adjusted life-years of caregiver and person with dementia at post-intervention and 6-month follow-up
Time Frame: baseline, 12-weeks (primary time-point), and 6-months after intervention commencement (follow-up)
Measured by the EuroQoL Instrument (EQ-5D-5L).
baseline, 12-weeks (primary time-point), and 6-months after intervention commencement (follow-up)
Change from baseline in resource use of both caregiver and person with dementia (cost-effectiveness) at post-intervention and 6-month follow-up
Time Frame: baseline, 12-weeks (primary time-point), and 6-months after intervention commencement (follow-up)
Measured by the Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD).
baseline, 12-weeks (primary time-point), and 6-months after intervention commencement (follow-up)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intervention dosage throughout intervention
Time Frame: Throughout the 12-weeks caregiver-delivered intervention (at least 5x per week)
Measured using the tailored diary for caregivers to record the duration of music or reading intervention use, responses of the person with dementia and details of activities used.
Throughout the 12-weeks caregiver-delivered intervention (at least 5x per week)
Caregivers' experiences of delivering the music and reading interventions
Time Frame: 12-weeks (primary time point)
Measured using post-intervention qualitative interviews with caregivers to capture descriptions of their experience of delivering the intervention and data to fine-tune the training, research design and the protocol.
12-weeks (primary time point)
Caregivers' experiences and reactions to the music and reading intervention training sessions
Time Frame: Post intervention training sessions at 1-week, 3-weeks, and 6-weeks
Measured using a short questionnaire.
Post intervention training sessions at 1-week, 3-weeks, and 6-weeks
Caregivers' adherence to programme and ability to apply the learning from the training sessions in their day-to-day caring
Time Frame: Throughout the 12-weeks caregiver-delivered intervention (at least 5x per week)
Measured using the tailored diary for caregivers to record the duration of music or reading intervention use, responses of the person with dementia and details of activities used
Throughout the 12-weeks caregiver-delivered intervention (at least 5x per week)
Change from baseline of cognition of participants with dementia at post-intervention to explore relationship between cognitive decline, behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia, depression and response to different conditions
Time Frame: baseline and 12-weeks (primary time-point, post-intervention)
Measured using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Scores Higher scores indicate better cognitive capacity with scores of 24-30 indicating no cognitive impairment; 19-23 indicating mild cognitive impairment; 10-18 indicating moderate cognitive impairment; and scores <10 indicating severe cognitive impairment.
baseline and 12-weeks (primary time-point, post-intervention)
Adverse events
Time Frame: Phone calls at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12
Adverse events will be measured throughout the 12-week intervention period for all groups via fortnightly phone calls. Participants will be asked about any adverse events they may have experienced, including hospitalisations, unexpected GP appointments or negative responses to the interventions.
Phone calls at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 20, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 23, 2022

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 23, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 9, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 9, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

In accordance with the Australian Code for Responsible Conduct of Research (Universities Australia, 2018), all data will be retained for retrieval and re-use in future research where participant permission is granted. Data made available will include individual-level deidentified participant data, reports on adverse events, and deidentified interview transcripts.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Following project completion, de-identified anonymised data will be made available (with participant consent). According to the GDPR, the consortium have agreed for reused for 10 years after the project has been completed.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be made available on the Australian Data Archive https://ada.edu.au and listed on Research Australia's https://researchaustralia.org website to facilitate access for future research.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Music Intervention

3
Subscribe