The Effect of Music and White Noise on Patients' Anxiety and Pain During Surgery for Impacted Mandibular Third Molar

February 5, 2025 updated by: Mine ALKAYA KARAGOZ, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University

The Effect of Music and White Noise on Patients' Anxiety and Pain During Surgery for Impacted Mandibular Third Molar: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effect of music and whitenoise on the anxiety and pain level of patients who had impacted third molars surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does music and white noise have an effect on the patient's intraoperative pain/pressure/discomfort?
  • Does music and white noise have an effect on the patient's anxiety level?

The researchers compared the music and white noise, music-only and ambient noise groups to see if there was an effect on anxiety and pain levels.

STAI-S form was applied to all participants before surgery. They marked their anxiety levels on the VAS scale. After the procedure, STAI-S form was applied and they marked the anxiety levels on the VAS scale. The pressure/pain level which they felt during the procedure was evaluated by VAS scale.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Our study was carried out on 66 patients, who applied to Ankara University Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, suffering from impacted mandibular third molars.

Group white noise and music listened to a preselected playlist played against a pre-prepared standard white noise through headphones that prevent ambient noise during the procedure. The playlist consisted of popular songs of the time. The patient could choose the music they wanted to listen to from the playlist using a hand-held tablet.

Group music only listened to the same preselected playlist without white noise through noise-isolating headphones during the procedure. The patient could choose the music they wanted to listen to from the playlist using a hand-held tablet.

Group control listened to the natural ambient noise during the procedure.

Surgical Procedure:

All patients were given a mouthwash with chlorhexidine gluconate before the surgery. Before the procedure, Nervus Alveolaris inferior block anesthesia and buccal infiltrative anesthesia were performed with 2.5% articain hydrochloride (Ultracain D-S forte ampoule, Sanofi Aventis) containing 1/100,000 epinephrine as a local anesthetic solution. In all three groups, a mucoperiosteal triangular flap was raised to reach the bone. After removing a sufficient amount of bone, the tooth was removed from the socket using a bein elevator. The original position of the flap was preserved, and the wounds were closed primarily using an atraumatic silk suture.

Data Collection The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State (STAI-S FORM) was administered to the patients before and after the procedure. Marking was made on the form containing a visual analog scale (VAS) for anxiety levels before the procedure. Post-procedure anxiety levels and pain/pressure feelings were marked on a separate form containing a VAS scale, and the desire to have the procedure performed again (1=never, 2=maybe/not sure, 3=willing) was questioned.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

66

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Yenimahalle/ankara
      • Ankara, Yenimahalle/ankara, Turkey, 06560
        • Ankara University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who applied to our clinic for impacted wisdom teeth extraction from the start date of the study
  • Patients without any diagnosed psychological disorder
  • Patients who gave their own voluntary consent to the study
  • Patients who had no medical history that could affect third molar surgery,

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who do not agree to volunteer.
  • Patients with any diagnosed psychological disorder
  • Patients with mental and physical disorders that may hinder cooperation
  • Pregnancy or lactating,
  • Antidepressant or anxiolytic drug use, having a disease that could prevent the surgery,
  • A severe infection around the impacted third molar
  • A prior tooth extraction

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: group music and white noise
Group music and white noise listened to a preselected playlist played against a pre-prepared standard white noise through headphones that prevent ambient noise during the procedure. The playlist consisted of popular songs of the time. The patient could choose the music they wanted to listen to from the playlist using a hand-held tablet.
The experimental groups were played a combination of music and white noise through headphones that blocked ambient noise during the surgical procedure. A playlist consisting of the popular songs of the era was prepared in advance. The patient could choose the music they wanted to listen to from the playlist using a hand-held tablet.
Experimental: group music only
Group music listened to the same preselected playlist without white noise through noise-isolating headphones during the procedure. The patient could choose the music they wanted to listen to from the playlist using a hand-held tablet.
The experimental groups were played music a through headphones that blocked ambient noise during the surgical procedure. A playlist consisting of the popular songs of the era was prepared in advance. The patient could choose the music they wanted to listen to from the playlist using a hand-held tablet.
No Intervention: group control
Group control listened to the natural ambient noise during the procedure.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
STAI-S
Time Frame: preoperative and through the surgery is over, about an hour after the patient entered the operating room
State anxiety measured on STAI-S (Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory). The total score can range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating more anxiety.
preoperative and through the surgery is over, about an hour after the patient entered the operating room
ANXIETY VAS
Time Frame: preoperative and through the surgery is over, about an hour after the patient entered the operating room
Anxiety measured on a VAS (Visual Analog Scale). A closed-ended scale of 0-10 cm ("0" no anxiety, "10" maximum imaginable anxiety) was used in the study
preoperative and through the surgery is over, about an hour after the patient entered the operating room
PAIN VAS
Time Frame: perioperative
Pain measured on a VAS (Visual Analog Scale ). A closed-ended scale of 0-10 cm ("0" no anxiety, "10" maximum imaginable anxiety) was used in the study
perioperative

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
willingness
Time Frame: through the surgery is over, about an hour after the patient entered the operating room
The desire to undergo the surgical procedure again (1=never, 2=maybe/not sure, 3=willing) under the same conditions was questioned.
through the surgery is over, about an hour after the patient entered the operating room

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: mine alkaya karagoz, DDS, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 30, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AU-FD-OMFS-MAK-001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on music and white noise intervention

Subscribe