Oat and Cholesterol

March 19, 2020 updated by: PepsiCo Global R&D

Impact of Oat Product on LDL Cholesterol in Healthy Men and Women With Elevated LDL-cholesterol

The primary objective is to assess the effect of an oat ingredient provided over 4 weeks on serum LDL cholesterol in men and women with elevated LDL-cholesterol compared to a placebo.

Secondary endpoints are fasting serum total- and HDL-cholesterol, non-HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose, insulin, glycated albumin, HOMA-IR and Framingham risk score

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

207

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5C 2N8
        • Glycemic Index Laboratories, Inc. 20 Victoria Street, 3rd Floor

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Fasting LDL cholesterol 116-193 mg/dl (3-5 mmol/L)
  2. Males and non-pregnant, non-lactating females 18-65 years
  3. Agree to consume the investigational product three times daily for the duration of the study
  4. BMI 18.5 to 39.9 kg/m2
  5. Blood pressure <160/100 mmHg
  6. Fasting triglycerides <4.0 mmol/L
  7. Fasting serum glucose <126mg/dL (<7 mmol/L)
  8. Serum urea and creatinine < 1.8 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
  9. Serum aspartate aminotransaminase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) < 2 times ULN
  10. Hemoglobin > 0.9 times lower limit of normal and < 1.1 times ULN
  11. Have a stable body weight (<7 kg change) over the past 3-months
  12. Absence of health conditions that would prevent fulfillment of study requirements

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnancy, breastfeeding or planning to be pregnant
  2. Allergy or sensitivity to study product ingredients
  3. Dislike description of study product
  4. Diet containing ≥15% of energy from saturated fat
  5. Consuming >20g fiber/per 1000 Kcal or >40g fiber/day (including soluble fiber supplements)
  6. Consumption of more than 2 drinks of alcohol per day, or more than 14 drinks per week
  7. Extreme dietary habits
  8. Smoking >5 cigarettes or equivalent per day
  9. Use of cholesterol lowering medication or prescription drug or for treating diabetes mellitus within 4 weeks of randomization
  10. Active major gastrointestinal disorder
  11. Major trauma or hospitalization for a medical condition or major surgical event within 6 months of randomization
  12. History of cancer within two years or randomization, except for non-melanoma skin cancer
  13. Any condition or substance use which might, in the opinion of the PI, make participation dangerous for the participant, lead to poor attendance or compliance or affect the results

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Powder Mix 1
Oat powder product, mixed with water
Powder packaged in sachets, mixed with water and consumed 3 times per day for 1 month
Placebo Comparator: Powder Mix 2
Brown rice milk powder product, mixed with water
Powder packaged in sachets, mixed with water and consumed 3 times per day for 1 month

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in fasting serum LDL-cholesterol
Time Frame: Baseline vs. Week 4
Reduction in mmol/L is a better outcome and >=5% reduction would be significant
Baseline vs. Week 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in fasting serum total cholesterol
Time Frame: Baseline vs. Week 4
Reduction in mmol/L is a better outcome
Baseline vs. Week 4
Change in fasting serum HDL cholesterol
Time Frame: Baseline vs. Week 4
Increase in mmol/L is a better outcome
Baseline vs. Week 4
Change in fasting non-HDL-cholesterol
Time Frame: Baseline vs. Week 4
Reduction in mmol/L is a better outcome
Baseline vs. Week 4
Change in fasting triglycerides
Time Frame: Baseline vs. Week 4
Reduction in mmol/L is a better outcome
Baseline vs. Week 4
Change in fasting glucose
Time Frame: Baseline vs. Week 4
Reduction in mmol/L is a better outcome
Baseline vs. Week 4
Change in fasting insulin
Time Frame: Baseline vs. Week 4
Reduction in mmol/L is a better outcome
Baseline vs. Week 4
Change in fasting glycated albumin
Time Frame: Baseline vs. Week 4
% reduction is a better outcome. Normal range is 11-17% of total albumin.
Baseline vs. Week 4
Change in fasting HOMA-IR
Time Frame: Baseline vs. Week 4
Reduction is a better outcome. Calculated from serum glucose mmol/L and insulin uU/ml. G×I/22.5, where G is fasting serum glucose in mmol/L and I is fasting serum insulin in uU/mL. Less than 1.0 means insulin-sensitive, which is optimal. Above 1.9 indicates early insulin resistance. Above 2.9 indicates significant insulin resistance.
Baseline vs. Week 4
Change in Framingham risk score
Time Frame: Baseline vs. Week 4
Reduction is a better outcome. 10 year risk for cardiovascular disease = total points expressed as % for men and women. Calculated from sex, age, total and HDL cholesterol (mg/dL), systolic blood pressure (mmHg), smoking (yes/no) and diabetes (yes/no) using the equations given on the Framingham Heart Study website.
Baseline vs. Week 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 10, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 20, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 9, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 23, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PEP-1801

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe