A Safety and Efficacy Study of IS-001 Injection in Patients Undergoing Robotic Hysterectomy

August 3, 2021 updated by: Intuitive Surgical

A Phase 2 Multi-Center Safety and Efficacy Study of IS-001 Injection in Patients Undergoing Robotic Gynecological Surgery Using the da Vinci® Surgical System With Firefly® Fluorescent Imaging

This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of intravenous injection of IS-001 to aid in intraoperative ureter structure delineation. Stage A of the study will determine the safe optimal dose and Stage B will determine expanded safety and efficacy for intraoperative ureter structure delineation for the identified optimal dose in study participants.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Injury to the ureter, the duct by which urine passes from the kidney into the bladder, is a well-known and serious complication of pelvic and abdominal surgery that frequently goes unrecognized intraoperatively. This study seeks to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous IS-001 injection to improve surgeon ureter visualization during robotic-assisted surgery with the da Vinci® Surgical System and Firefly® imaging. Stage A will be a dose-escalation to determine the optimal dose for ureter visualization and Stage B will be an expanded safety and efficacy evaluation of the optimal dose. Stage B will include a no-drug safety control to evaluate the effects of surgery alone on the safety parameters of the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

94

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20037
        • George Washington University Hospital
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78758
        • St.David's Medical Center
      • El Paso, Texas, United States, 79902
        • Las Palmas Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Female subject is between the ages of 18 and 75, inclusive
  2. Subject is scheduled to undergo robotic gynecological surgery using a da Vinci® surgical system with Firefly® fluorescent imaging
  3. Subject is willing and able to provide informed consent
  4. Subject is considered capable of complying with study procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is pregnant or nursing
  2. Subject has known active hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection

4. Subject is already enrolled in another investigational study 5. Subject has any other condition or personal circumstance that, in the judgment of the Investigator, might interfere with the collection of complete quality data or represents an unacceptable safety profile

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dose-escalation
Dose-cohort escalation of single intravenous injection of IS-001 starting with 20 mg (n=8), escalating in 20 mg increments until optimal dose is determined.
intravenous injection of IS-001 investigational drug
Experimental: Optimal dose-characterization
Single intravenous injection of IS-001 at the optimal dose will be administered to subjects assigned to the treatment group. Safety control subjects will not receive any study drug but will undergo robotic surgery and all associated safety assessment clinical trial procedures.
intravenous injection of IS-001 investigational drug
no drug injection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate fluorescent intensity of ureter by signal to background analysis
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Fluorescent intensity of ureter evaluated as signal to background
10 minutes
Evaluate fluorescent intensity of ureter by signal to background analysis
Time Frame: 30 minutes
Fluorescent intensity of ureter evaluated as signal to background
30 minutes
Evaluate fluorescent intensity of ureter by signal to background analysis
Time Frame: 60 minutes
Fluorescent intensity of ureter evaluated as signal to background
60 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety 12-Lead EKG Change from Baseline
Time Frame: 6 hours
12-Lead EKG change from baseline in QTc
6 hours
Incidence of abnormal blood work in tests results
Time Frame: 24 hours
Safety hematology complete blood count laboratory assessments Change from Baseline
24 hours
Incidence of abnormal blood work in tests results
Time Frame: 14 days
Safety hematology complete blood count laboratory assessments Change from Baseline
14 days
Incidence of abnormal blood work in tests results
Time Frame: 24 hours
Safety hematology comprehensive metabolic panel laboratory assessments Change from Baseline
24 hours
Incidence of abnormal blood work in tests results
Time Frame: 14 days
Safety hematology comprehensive metabolic panel laboratory assessments Change from Baseline
14 days
Incidence of abnormal urinalysis results
Time Frame: 14 days
Routine urinalysis laboratory assessment change from baseline
14 days
Safety Adverse Events Monitoring
Time Frame: 14 days
Drug related adverse events monitoring through 14-days
14 days
Pharmacokinetics Maximal Concentration (Cmax) of Drug Plasma Levels
Time Frame: 0, 1-2 hours and 2-3 hours
Maximal concentration of investigational drug-plasma levels (Cmax)
0, 1-2 hours and 2-3 hours
Pharmacokinetics Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve from Time Zero to Last Sampling (AUClast)
Time Frame: 0, 1-2 hours and 2-3 hours
Area under the plasma curve from t(0) to last plasma sample
0, 1-2 hours and 2-3 hours
Pharmacokinetics Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve from Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUCinf)
Time Frame: 0, 1-2 hours and 2-3 hours
Area under the plasma curve from t(0) extrapolated to infinity
0, 1-2 hours and 2-3 hours
Pharmacokinetics Drug Plasma Clearance (CL)
Time Frame: 0, 1-2 hours and 2-3 hours
Clearance of the investigational drug from plasma
0, 1-2 hours and 2-3 hours
Pharmacokinetics Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2)
Time Frame: 0, 1-2 hours and 2-3 hours
Half-life of the investigational drug in plasma
0, 1-2 hours and 2-3 hours
Pharmacokinetics Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz)
Time Frame: 0, 1-2 hours and 2-3 hours
The apparent volume of distribution of the investigational drug
0, 1-2 hours and 2-3 hours
Ureter Identification Efficacy on a Nominal Scale
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Independent reader assessment of ureter visibility of a 5 second video segment of the surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode on a nominal scale where 0=No and 1=Yes
10 minutes
Ureter Identification Efficacy on a Nominal Scale
Time Frame: 30 minutes
Independent reader assessment of ureter visibility of a 5 second video segment of the surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode on a nominal scale where 0=No and 1=Yes
30 minutes
Ureter Identification Efficacy on a Nominal Scale
Time Frame: 60 minutes
Independent reader assessment of ureter visibility of a 5 second video segment of the surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode on a nominal scale where 0=No and 1=Yes.
60 minutes
Ureter Delineation Efficacy as Length of Line Drawn in Millimeters
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Independent reader assessment of ureter delineation on a still frame of the surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode. Length of line drawn on still frame where ureter is visible to independent reader is compared between imaging conditions.
10 minutes
Ureter Delineation Efficacy as Length of Line Drawn
Time Frame: 30 minutes
Independent reader assessment of ureter delineation on a still frame of the surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode. Length of line drawn on still frame where ureter is visible to independent reader is compared between imaging conditions.
30 minutes
Ureter Delineation Efficacy as Length of Line Drawn
Time Frame: 60 minutes
Independent reader assessment of ureter delineation on a still frame of the surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode. Length of line drawn on still frame where ureter is visible to independent reader is compared between imaging conditions.
60 minutes
Surgeon Confidence of Ureter Visibility Assessed Post-Dose by Three-point Likert-type Scale
Time Frame: 10 minutes post-dose
Intra-operative surgeon rating of ureter visibility in surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode on a three point Likert-type scale where 0=No, 1=Uncertain and 2=Yes. Surgeon ureter visibility score will be compared between the two imaging conditions.
10 minutes post-dose
Surgeon Confidence of Ureter Visibility Assessed Post-Dose by Three-point Likert-type Scale
Time Frame: 30 minutes post-dose
Intra-operative surgeon rating of ureter visibility in surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode on a three point Likert-type scale where 0=No, 1=Uncertain and 2=Yes. Surgeon ureter visibility score will be compared between the two imaging conditions.
30 minutes post-dose
Surgeon Confidence of Ureter Visibility Assessed Post-Dose by Three-point Likert-type Scale
Time Frame: 60 minutes post-dose
Intra-operative surgeon rating of ureter visibility in surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode on a three point Likert-type scale where 0=No, 1=Uncertain and 2=Yes. Surgeon ureter visibility score will be compared between the two imaging conditions.
60 minutes post-dose
Surgeon Assessment of Relative Ureter Contrast Post-Dose on a Five-point Likert-type Scale
Time Frame: 10 minutes post-dose
Intra-operative surgeon rating of relative ureter contrast in surgical field in Firefly® light mode on a five point Likert-type scale where 0=No Fluorescence, 1=Iso-Fluorescence, 2=Mild Fluorescence, 3= Moderate Fluorescence and 4=Strong Fluorescence. Surgeon contrast score will be compared to contrast scores at other time-points.
10 minutes post-dose
Surgeon Assessment of Relative Ureter Contrast Post-Dose on a Five-point Likert-type Scale
Time Frame: 30 minutes post-dose
Intra-operative surgeon rating of relative ureter contrast in surgical field in Firefly® light mode on a five point Likert-type scale where 0=No Fluorescence, 1=Iso-Fluorescence, 2=Mild Fluorescence, 3= Moderate Fluorescence and 4=Strong Fluorescence. Surgeon contrast score will be compared to contrast scores at other time-points
30 minutes post-dose
Surgeon Assessment of Relative Ureter Contrast Post-Dose on a Five-point Likert-type Scale
Time Frame: 60 minutes post-dose
Intra-operative surgeon rating of relative ureter contrast in surgical field in Firefly® light mode on a five point Likert-type scale where 0=No Fluorescence, 1=Iso-Fluorescence, 2=Mild Fluorescence, 3= Moderate Fluorescence and 4=Strong Fluorescence. Surgeon contrast score will be compared to contrast scores at other time-points.
60 minutes post-dose

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Richard Farnam, MD, Las Palmas Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 28, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 8, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

July 22, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 3, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 5, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ISI-124804-2

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ureter Injury

Clinical Trials on IS-001

Subscribe