- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03937505
A Safety and Efficacy Study of IS-001 Injection in Patients Undergoing Robotic Hysterectomy
August 3, 2021 updated by: Intuitive Surgical
A Phase 2 Multi-Center Safety and Efficacy Study of IS-001 Injection in Patients Undergoing Robotic Gynecological Surgery Using the da Vinci® Surgical System With Firefly® Fluorescent Imaging
This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of intravenous injection of IS-001 to aid in intraoperative ureter structure delineation.
Stage A of the study will determine the safe optimal dose and Stage B will determine expanded safety and efficacy for intraoperative ureter structure delineation for the identified optimal dose in study participants.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Injury to the ureter, the duct by which urine passes from the kidney into the bladder, is a well-known and serious complication of pelvic and abdominal surgery that frequently goes unrecognized intraoperatively.
This study seeks to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous IS-001 injection to improve surgeon ureter visualization during robotic-assisted surgery with the da Vinci® Surgical System and Firefly® imaging.
Stage A will be a dose-escalation to determine the optimal dose for ureter visualization and Stage B will be an expanded safety and efficacy evaluation of the optimal dose.
Stage B will include a no-drug safety control to evaluate the effects of surgery alone on the safety parameters of the study.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
94
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
District of Columbia
-
Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20037
- George Washington University Hospital
-
-
Texas
-
Austin, Texas, United States, 78758
- St.David's Medical Center
-
El Paso, Texas, United States, 79902
- Las Palmas Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Female subject is between the ages of 18 and 75, inclusive
- Subject is scheduled to undergo robotic gynecological surgery using a da Vinci® surgical system with Firefly® fluorescent imaging
- Subject is willing and able to provide informed consent
- Subject is considered capable of complying with study procedures
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject is pregnant or nursing
- Subject has known active hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection
4. Subject is already enrolled in another investigational study 5. Subject has any other condition or personal circumstance that, in the judgment of the Investigator, might interfere with the collection of complete quality data or represents an unacceptable safety profile
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Dose-escalation
Dose-cohort escalation of single intravenous injection of IS-001 starting with 20 mg (n=8), escalating in 20 mg increments until optimal dose is determined.
|
intravenous injection of IS-001 investigational drug
|
|
Experimental: Optimal dose-characterization
Single intravenous injection of IS-001 at the optimal dose will be administered to subjects assigned to the treatment group.
Safety control subjects will not receive any study drug but will undergo robotic surgery and all associated safety assessment clinical trial procedures.
|
intravenous injection of IS-001 investigational drug
no drug injection
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluate fluorescent intensity of ureter by signal to background analysis
Time Frame: 10 minutes
|
Fluorescent intensity of ureter evaluated as signal to background
|
10 minutes
|
|
Evaluate fluorescent intensity of ureter by signal to background analysis
Time Frame: 30 minutes
|
Fluorescent intensity of ureter evaluated as signal to background
|
30 minutes
|
|
Evaluate fluorescent intensity of ureter by signal to background analysis
Time Frame: 60 minutes
|
Fluorescent intensity of ureter evaluated as signal to background
|
60 minutes
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Safety 12-Lead EKG Change from Baseline
Time Frame: 6 hours
|
12-Lead EKG change from baseline in QTc
|
6 hours
|
|
Incidence of abnormal blood work in tests results
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Safety hematology complete blood count laboratory assessments Change from Baseline
|
24 hours
|
|
Incidence of abnormal blood work in tests results
Time Frame: 14 days
|
Safety hematology complete blood count laboratory assessments Change from Baseline
|
14 days
|
|
Incidence of abnormal blood work in tests results
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Safety hematology comprehensive metabolic panel laboratory assessments Change from Baseline
|
24 hours
|
|
Incidence of abnormal blood work in tests results
Time Frame: 14 days
|
Safety hematology comprehensive metabolic panel laboratory assessments Change from Baseline
|
14 days
|
|
Incidence of abnormal urinalysis results
Time Frame: 14 days
|
Routine urinalysis laboratory assessment change from baseline
|
14 days
|
|
Safety Adverse Events Monitoring
Time Frame: 14 days
|
Drug related adverse events monitoring through 14-days
|
14 days
|
|
Pharmacokinetics Maximal Concentration (Cmax) of Drug Plasma Levels
Time Frame: 0, 1-2 hours and 2-3 hours
|
Maximal concentration of investigational drug-plasma levels (Cmax)
|
0, 1-2 hours and 2-3 hours
|
|
Pharmacokinetics Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve from Time Zero to Last Sampling (AUClast)
Time Frame: 0, 1-2 hours and 2-3 hours
|
Area under the plasma curve from t(0) to last plasma sample
|
0, 1-2 hours and 2-3 hours
|
|
Pharmacokinetics Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve from Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUCinf)
Time Frame: 0, 1-2 hours and 2-3 hours
|
Area under the plasma curve from t(0) extrapolated to infinity
|
0, 1-2 hours and 2-3 hours
|
|
Pharmacokinetics Drug Plasma Clearance (CL)
Time Frame: 0, 1-2 hours and 2-3 hours
|
Clearance of the investigational drug from plasma
|
0, 1-2 hours and 2-3 hours
|
|
Pharmacokinetics Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2)
Time Frame: 0, 1-2 hours and 2-3 hours
|
Half-life of the investigational drug in plasma
|
0, 1-2 hours and 2-3 hours
|
|
Pharmacokinetics Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz)
Time Frame: 0, 1-2 hours and 2-3 hours
|
The apparent volume of distribution of the investigational drug
|
0, 1-2 hours and 2-3 hours
|
|
Ureter Identification Efficacy on a Nominal Scale
Time Frame: 10 minutes
|
Independent reader assessment of ureter visibility of a 5 second video segment of the surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode on a nominal scale where 0=No and 1=Yes
|
10 minutes
|
|
Ureter Identification Efficacy on a Nominal Scale
Time Frame: 30 minutes
|
Independent reader assessment of ureter visibility of a 5 second video segment of the surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode on a nominal scale where 0=No and 1=Yes
|
30 minutes
|
|
Ureter Identification Efficacy on a Nominal Scale
Time Frame: 60 minutes
|
Independent reader assessment of ureter visibility of a 5 second video segment of the surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode on a nominal scale where 0=No and 1=Yes.
|
60 minutes
|
|
Ureter Delineation Efficacy as Length of Line Drawn in Millimeters
Time Frame: 10 minutes
|
Independent reader assessment of ureter delineation on a still frame of the surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode.
Length of line drawn on still frame where ureter is visible to independent reader is compared between imaging conditions.
|
10 minutes
|
|
Ureter Delineation Efficacy as Length of Line Drawn
Time Frame: 30 minutes
|
Independent reader assessment of ureter delineation on a still frame of the surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode.
Length of line drawn on still frame where ureter is visible to independent reader is compared between imaging conditions.
|
30 minutes
|
|
Ureter Delineation Efficacy as Length of Line Drawn
Time Frame: 60 minutes
|
Independent reader assessment of ureter delineation on a still frame of the surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode.
Length of line drawn on still frame where ureter is visible to independent reader is compared between imaging conditions.
|
60 minutes
|
|
Surgeon Confidence of Ureter Visibility Assessed Post-Dose by Three-point Likert-type Scale
Time Frame: 10 minutes post-dose
|
Intra-operative surgeon rating of ureter visibility in surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode on a three point Likert-type scale where 0=No, 1=Uncertain and 2=Yes.
Surgeon ureter visibility score will be compared between the two imaging conditions.
|
10 minutes post-dose
|
|
Surgeon Confidence of Ureter Visibility Assessed Post-Dose by Three-point Likert-type Scale
Time Frame: 30 minutes post-dose
|
Intra-operative surgeon rating of ureter visibility in surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode on a three point Likert-type scale where 0=No, 1=Uncertain and 2=Yes.
Surgeon ureter visibility score will be compared between the two imaging conditions.
|
30 minutes post-dose
|
|
Surgeon Confidence of Ureter Visibility Assessed Post-Dose by Three-point Likert-type Scale
Time Frame: 60 minutes post-dose
|
Intra-operative surgeon rating of ureter visibility in surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode on a three point Likert-type scale where 0=No, 1=Uncertain and 2=Yes.
Surgeon ureter visibility score will be compared between the two imaging conditions.
|
60 minutes post-dose
|
|
Surgeon Assessment of Relative Ureter Contrast Post-Dose on a Five-point Likert-type Scale
Time Frame: 10 minutes post-dose
|
Intra-operative surgeon rating of relative ureter contrast in surgical field in Firefly® light mode on a five point Likert-type scale where 0=No Fluorescence, 1=Iso-Fluorescence, 2=Mild Fluorescence, 3= Moderate Fluorescence and 4=Strong Fluorescence.
Surgeon contrast score will be compared to contrast scores at other time-points.
|
10 minutes post-dose
|
|
Surgeon Assessment of Relative Ureter Contrast Post-Dose on a Five-point Likert-type Scale
Time Frame: 30 minutes post-dose
|
Intra-operative surgeon rating of relative ureter contrast in surgical field in Firefly® light mode on a five point Likert-type scale where 0=No Fluorescence, 1=Iso-Fluorescence, 2=Mild Fluorescence, 3= Moderate Fluorescence and 4=Strong Fluorescence.
Surgeon contrast score will be compared to contrast scores at other time-points
|
30 minutes post-dose
|
|
Surgeon Assessment of Relative Ureter Contrast Post-Dose on a Five-point Likert-type Scale
Time Frame: 60 minutes post-dose
|
Intra-operative surgeon rating of relative ureter contrast in surgical field in Firefly® light mode on a five point Likert-type scale where 0=No Fluorescence, 1=Iso-Fluorescence, 2=Mild Fluorescence, 3= Moderate Fluorescence and 4=Strong Fluorescence.
Surgeon contrast score will be compared to contrast scores at other time-points.
|
60 minutes post-dose
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Richard Farnam, MD, Las Palmas Medical Center
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
May 28, 2019
Primary Completion (Actual)
July 8, 2021
Study Completion (Actual)
July 22, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 29, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 2, 2019
First Posted (Actual)
May 3, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 5, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 3, 2021
Last Verified
August 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- ISI-124804-2
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Ureter Injury
-
Prove pharmRecruitingUreter InjuryUnited States
-
Prove pharmCompletedUreter InjuryUnited States
-
Intuitive SurgicalNot yet recruiting
-
MediBeaconRecruitingUreter InjuryUnited States
-
Intuitive SurgicalCompletedUreter InjuryUnited States
-
Oxford University Hospitals NHS TrustUniversity of OxfordCompleted
-
Li-Cor, Inc.CompletedIntraoperative Ureter InjuryUnited States
-
Prove pharmNot yet recruiting
-
Intuitive SurgicalCompletedA Safety and Feasibility Study of IS-001 Injection in Patients Undergoing Robotic Colorectal SurgeryUreter InjuryUnited States
-
Li-Cor, Inc.WithdrawnIntraoperative Ureter InjuryUnited States
Clinical Trials on IS-001
-
Intuitive SurgicalCompletedUreter InjuryUnited States
-
Azura OphthalmicsAvaniaCompletedMeibomian Gland DysfunctionAustralia, New Zealand
-
Intuitive SurgicalCompletedA Safety and Feasibility Study of IS-001 Injection in Patients Undergoing Robotic Colorectal SurgeryUreter InjuryUnited States
-
Intuitive SurgicalCompletedSurgery | HysterectomyUnited States
-
Pacylex PharmaceuticalsOzmosis Research Inc.CompletedAdvanced Solid Tumor | B-cell Non Hodgkin LymphomaCanada
-
S-Alpha Therapeutics, Inc.CompletedMyopiaKorea, Republic of
-
IntegoGen, LLCWithdrawnHidradenitis SuppurativaUnited States
-
Toll Biotech Co. Ltd. (Beijing)Recruiting
-
Latigo BiotherapeuticsCompletedAcute Pain, PostoperativeUnited States
-
Patagonia Pharmaceuticals, LLCCompletedCongenital IchthyosisUnited States