Evaluation of Bone Mineral Density Changes Using Two Tibial Base Plate Designs in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in Young Patient

February 17, 2020 updated by: Michel Malo, Hopital du Sacre-Coeur de Montreal

Randomized Clinical Evaluation of Bone Mineral Density Changes Using Two Tibial Base Plate Designs in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in Young Patients

Arthritic disease in people less than 60 years old is increasingly common. Younger, active individuals often present now to orthopaedic surgeons requiring treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Knee arthroplasty has been offered as a viable option to provide pain relief and improve function in the middle-aged patient.

In a previous study submitted for publication, the investigators have looked at BMD in vivo after total knee replacement comparing two different tibial base plate designs in cemented and uncemented implants in terms of stiffness and modularity, and its effect on bone density changes, synovitis, osteolysis or survivorship. The investigators found a difference of 18% in bone mineral density favoring trabecular metal implant over cemented modular metal-back implant in patient between 55 and 75 years of age. The trabecular metal implant thus behaved as it was expected and preserved bone density in an elderly population.

No randomized clinical trial has looked at cemented titanium tibial insert to uncemented trabecular metal tibia insert in young population. In order to isolate stiffness as study variable, one would aim at randomizing a homogeneous patient population undergoing total knee arthroplasty with implants of similar articular geometry designs with different tibial baseplate, titanium versus trabecular metal. The trabecular metal implant is closer to human bone modulus of elasticity.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

THE GOAL OF OUR STUDY IS TO

  1. Quantify the amount of bone remodeling 24 months after total knee arthroplasty using sequential dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry of the proximal tibia in younger and more active patients (less than 60 years of age).
  2. Evaluate the evolution of functional outcome over a 24 months period using sequential subjective and objective clinical evaluations using the Knee Society Score (KSS) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Sf-12 v2 in this cohort of patients.
  3. There is also an interest in looking at the activity level before and after the surgery (by using the Tegner Activity Level Scale and the UCLA Activity Level Scale) and to determine the ability to return to an active lifestyle and the impact on implant survival.

Two groups will be created:

Group 1: NexGen cemented modular metal-backed tibial implant (Titanium) Group 2: NexGen uncemented Trabecular Metal(TM) modular tibial implant A total of 88 patients will be recruited

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

88

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 59 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Tricompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee
  • Age, under 60 years old at the time of surgery
  • Stable health (the patient should be able to undergo surgery and participate in a follow-up program based upon physical examination and medical history).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of inflammatory joint disease
  • Diagnosis of osteonecrosis
  • Infection; acute or chronic
  • Any current metal hardware on the proximal 25 cm of the tibia
  • History, remote or recent, of high tibial osteotomy or tibial plateau fracture
  • Any collateral ligamentous instability in the affected knee
  • Contra lateral below knee or above knee amputation
  • Ongoing Biphosphonate pharmacotherapy
  • Presence of clinically significant disease of the cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, hematologic,respiratory, endocrine, neurological, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, immune systems or other medical condition which is not well controlled.
  • Participants of a study who have received an investigational drug or device within the last 30 days
  • Patients unwilling or unable to cooperate in a follow-up program
  • Bone deficit (subchondral cyst)
  • Previous contralateral Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), ORIF, HTO
  • Patella deficiency needing grafting or preventing patella resurfacing

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: 45-54 y.o / cemented modular metal-backed tibial implant
This group will undergo a surgery for a knee arthroplasty following standard procedure at our center
Tibial implant will be done with a cemented implant
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: 55-59 y.o / cemented modular metal-backed tibial implant
This group will undergo a surgery for a knee arthroplasty following standard procedure at our center
Tibial implant will be done with a cemented implant
EXPERIMENTAL: 45-54 y.o / uncemented Trabecular Metal modular tibial implant
This group will undergo a surgery for a knee arthroplasty with a trabecular metal of the tibial implant
Tibial implant will be done with a uncemented implant
EXPERIMENTAL: 55-59 y.o / uncemented Trabecular Metal modular tibial implant
This group will undergo a surgery for a knee arthroplasty with a trabecular metal of the tibial implant
Tibial implant will be done with a uncemented implant

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
DEXA Scan
Time Frame: 24 months post-op
This exam will quantify the amount of bone density at 24 months after total knee arthroplasty. DXA scan can provide accurate, high-quality measurements of periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) with minimal precision error and a low coeficient of variation ranging from 1.3% to 4.7%17.
24 months post-op
KOOS (knee injury and osteoarthritis outcomes score )
Time Frame: 2 years post-op

The Index is self-administered and assesses the 5 subscales: pain (9 questions), other symptoms (7 questions), function in daily living (17 questions), function in sports and recreation (5) and knee related quality of live (4). All subscales are on 100, 100 being the best score, 0 the worst.

The total score is an average of all subscale

2 years post-op
KSS (Knee Society Score)
Time Frame: 2 years post-op
The original KSS has a "Knee Score" section (7 items) and a "Functional Score" section (3 items). Both sections are scored from 0 to 100 with lower scores being indicative of worse knee conditions and higher scores being indicative of better knee conditions.
2 years post-op

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The 12-item medical outcomes study short form health survey version 2.0 (SF-12v2)
Time Frame: 2 years post-op
This self-administered generic health status measure is composed of 12 items measuring 3 major health attributes: functional status, well-being, and overall evaluation of health
2 years post-op
Lyshom and Tegner
Time Frame: 2 years post-op
The Lysholm Scale currently consists of eight items that measure: pain (25 points), instability (25 points), locking (15 points), swelling (10 points), limp (5 points), stair climbing (10 points), squatting (5 points), and need for support (5 points). Every question response has been assigned an arbitrary score on an increasing scale. The total score is the sum of each response to the eight questions, and may range from 0-100. Higher scores indicate a better outcome with fewer symptoms or disability.
2 years post-op

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michel Malo, ND, Hopital Sacre-Coeur de Montreal

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 5, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 30, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 27, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 31, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 18, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PTG-Young

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Primary TKA with cemented modular metal-backed tibial implant

Subscribe