Acute Appendicitis: Active Observation With and Without Antibiotics

August 13, 2022 updated by: Göteborg University

Optimized Treatment for Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis; Active Observation With or Without Antibiotic Treatment

This study evaluates if early provision of antibiotics is a superior treatment compared to "traditional wait and see" with regard to symptom relief for suspected acute uncomplicated appendicitis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Recent long-term follow up results of antibiotic treatment of acute appendicitis in unselected populations indicate that approximately 70-80 % of patients respond to antibiotics, while the remaining 20-25% need an operation. Antibiotic treatment was associated with significantly fewer severe and non-severe complications compared to surgery. Therefore, antibiotic treatment can be regarded as safe and effective initial treatment of acute appendicitis based on evidence.

However, it remains to be evaluated to what extent antibiotic treatment is more effective compared to the most conservative application of procedures in the care of patients with acute appendicitis. A well- recognized approach in Sweden is watchful waiting at in-hospital conditions. A certain number of patients with suspected uncomplicated appendicitis will likely recover without any active treatment, but controlled evidence are lacking to what extent such recoveries may occur in the short- and long-term perspective.

The hypothesis is that antibiotic treatment is superior to active observation with regard to symptom relief at suspected acute appendicitis in selected patient groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

126

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Göteborg, Sweden, 413 45
        • Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with suspected appendicitis.
  • Age<60 years.
  • C-reactive protein < 60 mg/L.
  • White blod cell Count (leucocytes) < 13 e9 /L.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Antibiotic treatment
Patients will receive in-hospital intravenous antibiotics (Piperacillin/Tazobactam, 4 gram x 3), followed by 8-10 days of out-hospital oral antibiotic treatment (Ciprofloxacin 500 mgx2,Flagyl 400 mgx3). Surgery if no symptom relif occur.
Intravenous antibiotic treatment x 3, followed by oral antibiotics for 8-10 Days.
Other Names:
  • Flagyl
  • Piperacillin/Tazobactam
  • Ciprofloxacin
Other: Clinical observation
Patients are followed by in-hospital "Active observation" (watchful waiting) according to clinical routine. Patients are observed until either, recovery and dismissal from hospital, or decision for intervention (surgery) is taken.
In-hospital observation without antibiotics

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with no symptom relief
Time Frame: 48 hours
No symptom relief and surgery is deemed necessary.
48 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kent Lundholm, Professor, Göteborg University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 15, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 9, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 13, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 16, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Appendicitis

Subscribe