Specialty Medical Homes to Improve Outcomes for Patients With IBD and Behavioral Health Conditions

A comparative effectiveness study using an individual-level randomized design along with a pragmatic, mixed-methods approach to compare two strategies (e.g. in-person supported care, technology-supported care) all of which include evidence-based components for delivering IBD and BH care. Quantitative (e.g. self-report, electronic health record, process) and qualitative (e.g., interviews) data will be collected across multiple time points during the study period.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Behavioral Symptoms; Inflammatory Bowel Disease
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: TEAM; Other: TECH

Detailed Description

The investigators propose to conduct a comparative effectiveness research (CER) study of two evidence-based, patient-centered approaches implemented within an existing Specialty Medical Home (SMH) model: TEAM, an in-person, multidisciplinary team-based approach delivered at point of care and TECH, a technology-based (digital therapeutics, and telehealth) approach delivered at the patient's convenience with the guidance of health coaches. Both are designed to support care for adult patients with complex, chronic health conditions and behavioral health (BH) disorders, and will be tested in three of the nation's largest and most established SMHs for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). IBD serves as an exemplary chronic disease model where untreated BH issues have been associated with poor medical outcomes.

Primary outcomes are composite scores of measures focused on 1) IBD Symptom Severity, and 2) BH Symptom Severity. IBD Symptom Severity is measured via a composite IBD Complexity Score involving responses to two patient-reported scales: the PROMIS-GI measure and either the Harvey Bradshaw Index (for participants with Crohn's disease) or ulcerative colitis activity index (for participants with ulcerative colitis). BH Symptom Severity was measured utilizing the Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety-Depression Scale (PHQ-ADS), a composite of two patient-reported scale for measuring anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) and depression (Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-8). Scales are further defined in Results, Outcome Measures.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 657
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Pennsylvania
    • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
      • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 60 years (Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Inflammatory Bowel Disease Diagnosis of Crohn's or Ulcerative Colitis. Behavioral health symptoms mild to severe, defined as a score of >= 6 on the Personal Health Questionnaire 4 (PHQ4)

Exclusion Criteria:

• Lack of smart phone, and/or are unable to speak, read or understand English at the minimum-required level.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Other
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: TECH-telehealth approach; Each patient will have an initial face-to-face visit with the core treatment team described above and undergo the same triage process to determine their PH/BH care needs. Each TECH patient will participate in one face-to-face treatment team visit per year unless more frequent visits are deemed to be medically necessary; however, all other interactions will be conducted via technology-supported modalities	Other: TECH; TECH uses team-based care similar to TEAM, but in-person care is substituted with telemedicine (i.e., video visits and consultations) and digital behavioral health tools.
Active Comparator: TEAM-care as usual approach; Patients will be triaged based on their physical health (PH) and behavioral health (BH) complexity to determine the frequency of in-person visits and how much of these visits will be devoted to medical versus BH issues. Minor modifications were made to the TEAM approach during the COVID-19 public health emergency to account for reduced face-to-face time without changing the underlying differentiation between the two models of delivering SMH care.	Other: TEAM; TEAM incorporates team-based care with traditional in-person clinic visits. The care team includes a gastroenterologist, nurse practitioner, nutritionist, social worker/behavioral health specialist, and a psychologist or psychiatrist.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
IBD Symptom Severity	IBD symptom severity was measured via a composite IBD Complexity Score developed by clinical researchers to quantify both biological and psychosocial domains of IBD within an SMH setting. It includes the sum of patient-reported responses to two scales: the PROMIS GI symptoms scale, evaluating four domains of gastrointestinal symptoms; and disease-specific PRO-2 disease severity indices taken from the Harvey Bradshaw Index (for individuals with Crohn's disease) and Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index (for individuals with ulcerative colitis). The complexity score is calculated by adding the value of the patient's PRO-2 to the cumulative PROMIS-GI score. Lower scores indicate lower symptom severity; higher scores indicate higher symptom severity. The minimum score is 0; the maximum score is open-ended based on patient response. Only the total IBD Complexity Score is reported.	Compare scores at Baseline, 6-month and 12-month for any changes
Behavioral Health Symptom Severity	Behavioral health symptom severity was measured utilizing the Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety-Depression Scale (PHQ-ADS) - which combines the PHQ-8 and GAD-7 scales - as a composite measure of depression and anxiety. The Patient Health Questionnaire 8-item depression scale (PHQ-8) and 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) are among the best validated and most commonly used depression and anxiety measures, respectively. The PHQ-ADS is the sum of the PHQ-8 and GAD-7, where a decrease in scores indicates a decrease in BH symptom severity; a decrease of 3-4 points indicates MCID. Lower scores indicate lower levels of behavioral health symptom severity; higher scores indicate higher symptom severity. The minimum score is 0; the maximum score is 45. Only the total PHQ-ADS is reported.	Compare at Baseline, 6-month and 12-month for any changes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Functional Impairment	Functional impairment was measured using the validated Short Form 12 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-12v2) which includes 12 items from the Short-Form 36 Health Survey and yields a physical and mental composite score as well as 8 subscale values: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Responses are tallied via a norm-based scoring algorithm provided by the assessment licensing company. Lower scores correspond with poorer health-related functioning; higher scores indicate better health-related functioning. The minimum score is 18.5; the maximum score is 142.6. Only the total composite score (the sum of both the physical and mental scales) is reported.	Compare at baseline, 6-month and 12-month for any changes
IBD-IBS Symptom Severity	IBD-IBS Symptom Severity was measured using the Irritable Bowel Syndrome Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS) to more accurately capture IBD symptom severity for many individuals with IBD, particularly those with inactive IBD but persistent functional GI symptoms (e.g., IBD-IBS). The IBS-SSS scores pain severity, pain frequency, abdominal bloating, bowel satisfaction and interference with life on a 0-100 scale with a total score of 500. A 50-point or more reduction in this score is considered clinically meaningful. Total scores range from 0 to 500 with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. Answers to all questions are summed to achieve the total score. Subjects can be categorized as having mild (75-175), moderate (175-300), or severe (>300) IBS. Only total scores are reported.	Compare at baseline, 6-month and 12-month for any changes
Health Care Utilization	Health care utilization was captured through EHR data to measure categorical (yes or no) instances of ED visits and inpatient hospitalizations at both 6- and 12-months post-enrollment.	Compare at baseline, 6-month and 12-months for any changes
Patient Engagement	Patient engagement was measured using the validated IBD Self-Efficacy Scale (IBD-SES) which assesses one's confidence level in managing stress and emotions, managing medical care, managing symptoms and disease, and maintaining remission. The IBD-SES measures self-management activities across four subscales (Stress and Emotions; Medical Care; Symptoms and Disease; Remission), with higher scores indicating greater confidence in self-management. Responses for each question are summed to produce one overall and four subscale scores. The total score range is between 29 and 290, with 29 indicating the lowest level of self-efficacy and 290 indicating the highest. Each item is scored 1-10, with 1 being assigned for responses of "Not confident at all" and a score of 10 assigned for responses of "Totally confident." Only total scores are reported.	Compare at baseline, 6-month and 12-month for any changes
Quality of Life	Quality of life was evaluated using the Short Quality of Life in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ), a validated tool which measures physical, social, and emotional health-related quality of life (QOL) for patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. On a 7-point scale, lower scores correspond with a lower perceived QOL, while higher scores represent a higher perceived QOL. Responses for each question are summed for a total score between 10 and 70, with 10 reflecting poor QOL and 70 reflecting high QOL. Each item is scored 1-7, with 1 being assigned for responses indicating the highest severity of symptoms, and 7 being assigned for those reflecting the lowest severity of symptoms. Only total scores are reported.	Compare at baseline, 6-month and 12-month for any changes

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: University of Pittsburgh
• Collaborators: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; The Cleveland Clinic; Mount Sinai Hospital, New York
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Eva Szigethy, MD, PhD, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): July 1, 2019
• Primary Completion (Actual): March 28, 2025
• Study Completion (Actual): March 28, 2025

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: May 28, 2019
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: June 10, 2019
• First Posted (Actual): June 14, 2019

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimated): September 3, 2025
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: August 13, 2025
• Last Verified: August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Intestinal Diseases; Digestive System Diseases; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Gastroenteritis; Behavior; Behavioral Symptoms; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
• Other Study ID Numbers: STUDY19020176; IHS-2017C3-8930 (Other Grant/Funding Number: PCORI)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO
• IPD Plan Description: Individual Participant Data will not be shared. Data is shared at the aggregate level

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No
• product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.: No