Student Anxiety & Stress Study (SASS)

July 14, 2020 updated by: Mark A. Lumley, Wayne State University

Emotional Awareness and Expression Therapy and Mindfulness Meditation Training for College Students With Anxiety and Somatic Symptoms: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The present study is a randomized clinical trial of an emotional awareness and expression intervention (EAET) and a mindfulness meditation intervention (MMT) for Wayne State University students with anxiety and somatic symptoms. Each of these treatments will be compared to a wait list control condition and to one another to evaluate how well the treatments improve physical and psychological symptoms, stress, and interpersonal functioning of 120 Wayne State University students at 4-week and 8-weeks post-randomization. This research is intended to provide an evidence-based approach to working with emotions to improve both anxiety and somatic symptoms in young adults and will illuminate how EAET compares to the commonly used mindfulness training. It is hypothesized that both active interventions will be superior to no treatment, and differences between the two treatments will be explored.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Anxiety is an increasingly common condition among college students and is often accompanied by somatic symptoms. These conditions impair students' social, psychological, and academic functioning and outcomes. Although students are utilizing campus and community mental health centers at increasing rates, these resources are strained. The present study aims to test the efficacy of two brief treatment options for students.

Integrating techniques from several emotion-focused therapies, the investigators have developed and tested an intervention encouraging the awareness and expression of habitually suppressed or avoided emotions. This Emotional Awareness and Expression Therapy (EAET) has been evaluated with various patient populations including fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, chronic pelvic pain, and medically unexplained symptoms. Results of these trials suggest that the intervention is efficacious in improving physical and psychological well-being, and is equal to or superior to other psychological interventions for somatic conditions. The present study seeks to advance the EAET literature by evaluating the efficacy of the intervention for a broader population and by employing a strong and conceptually different comparison condition: mindfulness meditation training.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

53

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202
        • Wayne State University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria: university student, reporting at least moderate levels of anxiety (GAD-7) and somatic symptoms (PHQ-15) -

Exclusion Criteria: psychosis, lack of fluency with spoken and written English language

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Emotional Awareness & Expression Therapy
Participants will attend three individual sessions focused on becoming aware of and expressing avoided or conflicted emotions.
emotion-focused
Experimental: Mindfulness Meditation Training
Participants will attend three individual sessions focused on increasing equanimity and compassion and reducing self-judgement.
meditation training and practice
No Intervention: Wait-List Control
Participants will receive the intervention of their choice following assessment at four and eight weeks after randomization.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Generalized Anxiety Scale-7
Time Frame: change from baseline to four and eight weeks after baseline
symptoms of anxiety
change from baseline to four and eight weeks after baseline
Patient Health Questionnaire-15
Time Frame: change from baseline to four and eight weeks after baseline
The 15-item measure asks patients how much they have been bothered by various somatic symptoms such as headaches, back pain, and digestive distress during the previous 2 weeks, with answers ranging from 0 (not at all) to 2 (a lot). Items are summed to generate a total score with higher scores indicating greater distress regarding somatic symptoms.
change from baseline to four and eight weeks after baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Brief Symptom Inventory
Time Frame: change from baseline to four and eight weeks after baseline
psychological symptoms
change from baseline to four and eight weeks after baseline
Patient Global Impression of Change
Time Frame: four and eight weeks after baseline
change in health status since the start of the study
four and eight weeks after baseline
Perceived Stress Scale
Time Frame: change from baseline to four and eight weeks after baseline
The 14-item measure asks patients how often they had experienced thoughts and feelings such as lack of control and difficulty coping during the previous 2 weeks, with answers ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (very often). Items are summed to generate a total score with higher scores indicating higher levels of perceived stress.
change from baseline to four and eight weeks after baseline
Satisfaction With Life Scale
Time Frame: change from baseline to four and eight weeks after baseline
The 5-item measure asks patients the degree to which they agree with statements such as "In most ways my life is close to my ideal", with answers ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Items are summed to create a total score with higher scores indicating a greater degree of satisfaction with life.
change from baseline to four and eight weeks after baseline

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Emotional Approach Coping Scale
Time Frame: change from baseline to four and eight weeks after baseline
emotional approach coping
change from baseline to four and eight weeks after baseline
Emotional Expressivity Scale
Time Frame: change from baseline to four and eight weeks after baseline
Measures the extent to which patients outwardly display emotion. The 17-item measure asks patients the degree to which items such as "I display my emotions to other people" describe them on a scale from 1 (never) to 6 (always). Scores are summed to generate a total score with higher scores indicating greater emotional expressiveness.
change from baseline to four and eight weeks after baseline
Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised
Time Frame: change from baseline to four and eight weeks after baseline
The 12-item measure asks patients to rate the degree to which statements indicating four components of mindfulness (attention, focus on the present, awareness, and acceptance) apply to them, on a scale ranging from 1 (rarely/not at all) to 4 (almost always). Items are summed to generate a total score with higher scores indicating greater mindfulness.
change from baseline to four and eight weeks after baseline
Acceptance and Action Questionnaire
Time Frame: change from baseline to four and eight weeks after baseline
). The 9-item measure assesses avoidance of private experiences such as emotions, thoughts, and memories as well as the ability to take action under adverse circumstances. It asks patients to indicate how true each statement is of themselves on a scale ranging from 1 (never true) to 7 (always true). Items are summed and higher scores indicate greater levels of psychological inflexibility.
change from baseline to four and eight weeks after baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 5, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 28, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

April 28, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 14, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1904002172

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety

Clinical Trials on Emotional Awareness & Expression Therapy

Subscribe