Tonometry and Duplex Ultrasound to Predict AAA Progression and CV Events in Aneurysm Patients (1-2-3 Trial)

April 10, 2024 updated by: Rijnstate Hospital

Tonometry (1) and Duplex Ultrasound (2) to Predict Abdominal Aorta Aneurysm (3) Progression and Cardiovascular Events in Aneurysm Patients

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a common vascular disease and associated with risk of rupture, but also with a high cardiovascular (CV) event rate. A key difficulty in AAA is predicting these life-threatening complications, highlighting the need to explore the potential of novel techniques. Both progression of AAA and CV events are strongly linked to vascular health. In 2013, the SMART risk score is developed to calculate the risk of the patients for recurrent vascular events based on clinical characteristics. Recently, a novel, easy to perform, non-invasive test of endothelial function (the carotid artery reactivity (CAR) test), reflecting target organ damage, has recently been introduced. The CAR is a simple, quick (5-min), non-invasive test that uses ultrasound to examine the carotid artery in response to sympathetic stimulation by placing one hand in cold water. This test shows strong agreement with both coronary and aortic responses to sympathetic stimulation and predicted CV events in patients with peripheral arterial disease.

The aim of this prospective 2-year follow-up study is to investigate the predictive capacity of the CAR-test in comparison to the SMART risk score for the development of cardiovascular events in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm who have not yet reached the treatment threshold. This could aid clinical decision making in the need for (surgical) intervention, but also alter (drug) treatment to reduce risk of cardiovascular events. Secondary objectives are to investigate the predictive capacity of the CAR-test for progression of the abdominal aortic aneurysm, and to evaluate QoL scores in patients under surveillance for AAA. The aim is to provide insight if these scores can help clinical decision making.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators will include 167 patients under surveillance for AAA who are all currently under the threshold for repair (i.e. AAA diameter 40-50 mm for men and 35-45 mm for women). Participants will be recruited from all collaborating hospitals (Radboudumc, Rijnstate, CWZ) after providing written informed consent. Additionally, AAA-patients under surveillance of general practitioners are eligible (and will be contacted through the hospital-links), since the nature of the tests allow for performing all tests at the general practitioners' office.

In this observational, prospective study, a total of 167 patients under surveillance for an AAA, who are currently under threshold for repair (i.e. AAA diameter 40-50 mm for men and 35-44 mm for women), will be included. Baseline patient characteristics will be registered, including traditional risk factors and CV-history. In addition to regular care of measuring AAA diameter progression (in mm/year), the investigators will perform the CAR-test (10-min) and non-invasive arterial stiffness measures (PWA and PWV with the SphygmoCor device (10-min) one time as baseline. Furthermore, the investigators will ask patients to complete a questionnaire about the quality of their life (Appendix 1). A second questionnaire tries to clarify the disease experience of the patients and can be found in Appendix 2. Both questionnaires will be asked to be completed at the start and the end of the study. Subsequently, the investigators will record major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) according to the International Classification of Disease-10. Registration of MACE will be performed using hospital-records and following international guidelines. Across a 2-year follow-up, by means of regular follow-up appointments, the investigators will examine AAA progression (in mm/year) and the ability of the CAR parameter and arterial stiffness parameters to predict CV-events.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

167

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Arnhem, Netherlands
        • Rijnstate Hospital
    • Gelderland
      • Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6525GA
        • Radboudumc
      • Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6532SZ
        • Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients under surveillance for an AAA, who are currently under threshold for repair (i.e. AAA diameter 40-50 mm men and 35-44 mm for women), will be included. AAA patients will be recruited from all collaborating hospitals (Radboudumc, Rijnstate, CWZ), who provide written informed consent. Additionally, also AAA-patients under surveillance of general practitioners are eligible (and will be contacted through the hospital-links), since the nature of the tests allow for performing all tests at the general practitioners' office.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female at least 18 years old;
  • Informed consent form understood and signed and patient agrees to follow- up visits;
  • Has an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), who is still under surveillance;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Life expectancy < 2 years;
  • Psychiatric or other condition that may interfere with the study;
  • Participating in another clinical study, interfering on outcomes;
  • Increased risk for coronary spasms (score Rose-questionnaire ≥2; this questionnaire can be found in Appendix 3);
  • Presence of Raynaud's phenomenon, chronic pain syndrome at upper extremity(s), presence of an AV fistula or shunt, open wounds to the upper extremity(s), and/or scleroderma associated with placing the hand in ice water;
  • Recent (<3 months) presence of angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, cerebral infarction, and/or heart failure, or PAD treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)
Time Frame: 2 year follow-up
Incidence of MACE including myocardial infarction, cerebral infarction, heart failure, and peripheral vascular disease
2 year follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SMART risk score
Time Frame: Baseline
Second Manifestations of ARTerial disease risk score is developed to determine the risk of recurrent vascular events based on clinical characteristics of the patients
Baseline
SphygmoCor parameters
Time Frame: Baseline
Peripheral pressure measurements (PWA)
Baseline
SphygmoCor parameters
Time Frame: Baseline
central pressure measurements (derived using a transfer function, PWA)
Baseline
SphygmoCor parameters
Time Frame: Baseline
abdominal pressure measurements (derived using a transfer function, PWA)
Baseline
SphygmoCor parameters - cardiac output parameter
Time Frame: Baseline
SEVR
Baseline
SphygmoCor parameters - cardiac output parameter
Time Frame: Baseline
ED
Baseline
SphygmoCor parameters
Time Frame: Baseline
PWV
Baseline
CAR-test results
Time Frame: Baseline
Percentage of vasodilation/vasoconstriction to the CAR test at the common carotid artery at baseline
Baseline
CAR-test results
Time Frame: Baseline
magnitude of the blood flow and perfusion response
Baseline
CAR-test results
Time Frame: Baseline
timing of the blood flow and perfusion response
Baseline
CAR-test results
Time Frame: Baseline
blood pressure responses
Baseline
CAR-test results
Time Frame: Baseline
heart rate responses
Baseline
AAA progression
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
AAA diameter progression in mm/year
2 year follow up
Aorta repair
Time Frame: Within 2 year follow-up
If the patient underwent aorta repair
Within 2 year follow-up
AAA rupture
Time Frame: Within 2 year follow up
If the AAA ruptured
Within 2 year follow up
Score EQ-5D questionnaire
Time Frame: At baseline and after 2 years
Patient reported outcomes measured by the general health questionnaire
At baseline and after 2 years
Score IPQ-K questionnaire
Time Frame: At baseline and after 2 years
Patient reported outcomes measured by the disease perception questionnaire
At baseline and after 2 years
Clinical success
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
Incidence of serious adverse events
2 year follow up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Demographic characteristics
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
Age
2 year follow up
Demographic characteristics
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
gender
2 year follow up
Demographic characteristics
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
height
2 year follow up
Demographic characteristics
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
weight
2 year follow up
Demographic characteristics
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
ASA class
2 year follow up
Demographic characteristics
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
medical history
2 year follow up
Demographic characteristics
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
blood pressure
2 year follow up
Demographic characteristics
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
heart rate
2 year follow up
Demographic characteristics
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
cardiac measurements
2 year follow up
Demographic characteristics
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
SVS class
2 year follow up
Medication use
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
Anti-platelets
2 year follow up
Medication use
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
anti-coagulants
2 year follow up
Medication use
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
anti-hypertensives
2 year follow up
Medication use
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
statins
2 year follow up
Medication use
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
beta-blockers
2 year follow up
Medication use
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
sympathicomimetics
2 year follow up
Laboratory results
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
Hemoglobin
2 year follow up
Laboratory results
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
serum creatinine
2 year follow up
Laboratory results
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
cholesterol
2 year follow up
Laboratory results
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
eGFR
2 year follow up
Laboratory results
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
crp
2 year follow up
Anatomic characteristics of AAA
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
AAA sac diameter
2 year follow up
Anatomic characteristics of AAA
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
infrarenal aortic neck lumen diameter
2 year follow up
Anatomic characteristics of AAA
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
proximal non-aneurysmal aortic neck length
2 year follow up
Anatomic characteristics of AAA
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
proximal aortic neck angle
2 year follow up
Anatomic characteristics of AAA
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
aneurysm blood lumen diameter
2 year follow up
Anatomic characteristics of AAA
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
common iliac artery diameter left
2 year follow up
Anatomic characteristics of AAA
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
common iliac artery diameter right
2 year follow up
Anatomic characteristics of AAA
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
blood lumen diameter
2 year follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michel Rijnen, MD, prof, Rijnstate Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 29, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Clinical Trials on Carotid Artery Reactivity test (CAR test)

Subscribe