AXER-204 in Participants With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury (RESET)

July 28, 2023 updated by: ReNetX Bio, Inc.

A Multicenter, Two Part Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of AXER-204 in Subjects With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury

This two-part trial will assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of AXER-204 administered by lumbar puncture and slow bolus infusion. Part 1 will evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single ascending doses of AXER-204. Part 2 will evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of repeated doses AXER-204 in comparison to placebo.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

AXER-204 is a human fusion protein that acts as a soluble decoy/trap for the myelin-associated inhibitors of axonal growth known as Nogo-A, MAG, and OMgp. AXER-204 and a surrogate protein used in early preclinical studies have been found to promote axon growth and recovery of function in animal models of spinal cord injury.

Part 1 of the trial is a multicenter, open-label, single ascending dose study in participants with chronic cervical spinal cord injury. Four cohorts of 6 participants each are planned, with participants within each cohort expected to receive the same dose of AXER-204.

Part 2 is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, repeat dose study in chronic cervical spinal cord injury participants. Approximately 32 participants will be randomized (ratio 1:1) to receive repeated doses of AXER-204 or placebo (a phosphate buffered saline formulation). The dose level and dose frequency will be dependent upon outcomes from Part 1.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033
        • Keck Medicine of USC
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30309
        • Shepherd Center
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Shirley Ryan AbilityLab / Northwestern
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02129
        • Spaulding Rehabilitation
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Thomas Jefferson University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Traumatic spinal cord injury that occurred ≥ 1 year ago
  2. Cervical spinal cord injury with serious neurologic deficit as evidenced by 1) bilateral ISNCSCI UEMS between 4 and 36 points inclusive, and 2) bilateral GRASSP Prehension Ability score between 4 and 17 points inclusive
  3. Confirmation by MRI of the following:

    1. Chronic SCI (persistent spinal cord lesion)
    2. For AIS grade of A without sensory or motor zone of partial preservation extending at least two levels caudal to the level of injury, no apparent transection of the cord
    3. CSF space spanning the lesion

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Penetrating injury to the cord or spinal cord trauma caused by ballistic injury including gunshot that did not penetrate the spinal cord
  2. History of stroke, cerebrovascular injury, or elevated intracranial pressure
  3. Contraindications for lumbar puncture
  4. Requiring mechanical ventilatory assistance of any type
  5. Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35 kg/m2 or body weight <50 kg
  6. History of life threatening allergic or immune-mediated reaction to vaccines, or biologic drugs, at any time or any life threatening allergic or immune-mediated reaction within the past 12 months
  7. Subjects fitted with an implanted pump or port for delivery of therapeutics to the CSF
  8. Uncontrolled medical condition including but not limited to cardiovascular disease, sleep apnea, obstructive lung disease, severe neuropathic or severe chronic pain, severe autonomic dysreflexia
  9. Participation in any other investigational drug or device trial within 30 days or within 5 half-lives of the investigational drug or any past participation in a SCI cellular therapy trial.

Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: AXER-204
Part 1 - Single ascending doses; Part 2 - Repeated dose
human NoGo Trap fusion protein
Other Names:
  • human NoGo Trap
  • human Nogo Receptor decoy
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Part 2 only - Repeated dose
Phosphate buffered saline formulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: Up to Day 29 for Part 1 and Day 253 for Part 2
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is a life-threatening event, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in a significant disability/incapacity or congenital anomaly, or is a medically important event.
Up to Day 29 for Part 1 and Day 253 for Part 2
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to Time of the Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) of AXER-204 in Serum
Time Frame: Part 1: pre-dose and 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h post-dose, Day 4, 8, 15, and 29, Part 2: pre-dose and 4 h post-dose on days 1, 21, 42, 63, and 104; and on Study Days 169 and 253.
Part 1: pre-dose and 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h post-dose, Day 4, 8, 15, and 29, Part 2: pre-dose and 4 h post-dose on days 1, 21, 42, 63, and 104; and on Study Days 169 and 253.
Cmax in Serum
Time Frame: Part 1: pre-dose and 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h post-dose, Day 4, 8, 15, and 29, Part 2: pre-dose and 4 h post-dose on days 1, 21, 42, 63, and 104; and on Study Days 169 and 253.
Part 1: pre-dose and 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h post-dose, Day 4, 8, 15, and 29, Part 2: pre-dose and 4 h post-dose on days 1, 21, 42, 63, and 104; and on Study Days 169 and 253.
Tmax in Serum
Time Frame: Part 1: pre-dose and 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h post-dose, Day 4, 8, 15, and 29, Part 2: pre-dose and 4 h post-dose on days 1, 21, 42, 63, and 104; and on Study Days 169 and 253.
Part 1: pre-dose and 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h post-dose, Day 4, 8, 15, and 29, Part 2: pre-dose and 4 h post-dose on days 1, 21, 42, 63, and 104; and on Study Days 169 and 253.
t1/2 in Serum
Time Frame: Part 1: pre-dose and 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h post-dose, Day 4, 8, 15, and 29, Part 2: pre-dose and 4 h post-dose on days 1, 21, 42, 63, and 104; and on Study Days 169 and 253.
Part 1: pre-dose and 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h post-dose, Day 4, 8, 15, and 29, Part 2: pre-dose and 4 h post-dose on days 1, 21, 42, 63, and 104; and on Study Days 169 and 253.
Clearance From Serum
Time Frame: Day 1 pre-dose up to Day 29 in Part 1, Pre-dose up to Day 253 in Part 2
Day 1 pre-dose up to Day 29 in Part 1, Pre-dose up to Day 253 in Part 2
Volume of Distribution
Time Frame: Part 1: pre-dose and 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h post-dose, Day 4, 8, 15, and 29, Part 2: pre-dose and 4 h post-dose on days 1, 21, 42, 63, and 104; and on Study Days 169 and 253.
Volume of distribution calculated from serum exposure data
Part 1: pre-dose and 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h post-dose, Day 4, 8, 15, and 29, Part 2: pre-dose and 4 h post-dose on days 1, 21, 42, 63, and 104; and on Study Days 169 and 253.
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to Time of the Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) of AXER-204 in CSF
Time Frame: Part 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 24 h, 72 h, Days 8 and 29, Part 2: pre-dose on Days 1, 21, 42, 63, and 104, and on Day 253.
Part 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 24 h, 72 h, Days 8 and 29, Part 2: pre-dose on Days 1, 21, 42, 63, and 104, and on Day 253.
Cmax of AXER-204 in CSF
Time Frame: Part 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 24 h, 72 h, Days 8 and 29, Part 2: pre-dose on Days 1, 21, 42, 63, and 104, and on Day 253.
Part 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 24 h, 72 h, Days 8 and 29, Part 2: pre-dose on Days 1, 21, 42, 63, and 104, and on Day 253.
Tmax of AXER-204 in CSF
Time Frame: Part 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 24 h, 72 h, Days 8 and 29, Part 2: pre-dose on Days 1, 21, 42, 63, and 104, and on Day 253.
Part 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 24 h, 72 h, Days 8 and 29, Part 2: pre-dose on Days 1, 21, 42, 63, and 104, and on Day 253.
t1/2 of AXER-204 in CSF
Time Frame: Part 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 24 h, 72 h, Days 8 and 29, Part 2: pre-dose on Days 1, 21, 42, 63, and 104, and on Day 253.
Part 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 24 h, 72 h, Days 8 and 29, Part 2: pre-dose on Days 1, 21, 42, 63, and 104, and on Day 253.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI) Bilateral Upper Extremity Motor Score (UEMS)
Time Frame: Baseline to Day 169
The ISNCSCI bilateral Upper Extremity Motor Score (UEMS) is determined by examining the muscle function within each of the 5 myotomes encompassing arm and hand function on each side of the body. A score ranging from 0 to 5 can be given to each myotome tested resulting in a maximum score of 50. Higher values indicate greater strength.
Baseline to Day 169
Change in Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensation and Prehension (GRASSP) Bilateral Prehension Performance Score
Time Frame: Baseline to Day 169
The GRASSP Bilateral Prehension Performance Score is determined based on performance of four tasks with each hand with scores ranging from 0 to 5 for each task resulting in a maximum score of 40. Higher scores indicate better function.
Baseline to Day 169
Change in Version III of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III) Self-care
Time Frame: Baseline to Day 169
The SCIM III questionnaire self-care score assesses activities of daily living including feeding, bathing, dressing, and grooming. The self-care score ranges 0-20 with higher scores correspond to better ability to carry out these self-care activities.
Baseline to Day 169
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Responder Rate
Time Frame: Day 169
The PGIC instrument captures the patient's overall evaluation of response to treatment. Specifically, the PGIC asks: "Since beginning this clinical trial, how would you describe the overall change (if any) related to your chronic spinal cord injury?" The patient is asked to report the degree to which they have changed since entering the treatment period using a 7-point Likert scale (1='Much worse', 2='Worse', 3='A little worse', 4='No change', 5='A little better', 6='Better', 7='Much better') and "If better or worse, what has changed?". Patients that have evaluation results including "Much better", "Better", or "A little better" are considered Responders.
Day 169

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: George Maynard, PhD, ReNetX Bio

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 16, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 21, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 21, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 11, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 28, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Spinal Cord Injury

Clinical Trials on AXER-204

Subscribe