Haemodialysis fMRI Salt Appetite Study (HeMSA)

April 13, 2023 updated by: Imperial College London

Examining Salt Appetite in Haemodialysis Patients Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

  1. Assessing how the rapid removal of salt and water by haemodialysis alters regional brain activity (by measurement of the brain blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal using functional MRI) during tasting of soup of differing salt concentrations.
  2. Identify differences in the brain response to salt taste pre- and post-haemodialysis between haemodialysis patients who are either able or unable to control between dialysis weight gain

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

HeMSA Study Phase 2 Up to 20 male, haemodialysis patient who have average %IDWG >4% will be recruited with the target, to proceed to scanning, of 14 patients. Following consent the patients will complete questionnaires (including Salt intake questionnaire - DSQ (Gkza and Davenport, 2017), Edinburgh handedness questionnaire (Oldfield, 1971), MRI checklist) and undergo salt taste preference and threshold testing during a 1 hour session prior to dialysis. The purpose of this visit is to establish the tasteless solution and 2 soup salt concentrations to be used in the salt taste fMRI paradigm, obtain baseline data regarding estimate of salt intake and ensure MRI is safe for this patient.

Patients will then attend 2 MRI scanning visits at the Hammersmith Hospital Imperial Campus, one the morning immediately before haemodialysis and one the morning after haemodialysis. Prior to the MRI session, at the Imperial College Clinical Research Facility, the patient will undergo various clinical assessments and have venous blood samples taken. The MRI will be undertaken at the Imperial College Clinical Imaging Facility using a Siemens 3T Verio scanner. During the scan subjects will taste, via a taste delivery system, aliquots of tasteless solution, sucralose, and 2 soup with different concentrations of salt. Solutions will be delivered in a block design.

HeMSA Study Phase 3 3 groups (healthy controls, haemodialysis (HD) patients with %IDWG <4%, haemodialysis patients with %IDWG >4% - patients froms phase 2 will contribute to the latter group) Protocol will follow that for HeMSA Phase 2. Healthy controls will also have 2 study visits at a similar period apart to the HD participants.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

90

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Haemodialysis patients under the care of Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust and healthy controls

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

All participants:

  • Male
  • Aged 18-65 years
  • Non-smoker (ex-smokers allowed)
  • Right handed (able to use a right handed response button)
  • Able to tolerate 1 hour MRI scanning session

For haemodialysis patients:

  • Established on haemodialysis for more than 6 months
  • Urine output <200ml/24 hours
  • Average (over the past month) interdialytic weight gain:

    1. Main phase 2: >4 %IDWG
    2. Main phase 3: <4 or >4 %IDWG

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • Current smoker
  • Uncontrolled depression (change in use of anti-depressants in last 3 months, or BDI-II score >28/63)
  • Neurological disorder (Parkinson's disease, serious cerebrovascular disease, epilepsy, moderate-severe traumatic brain injury, dementia)
  • Previous bariatric surgery
  • Inflammatory state (CRP >20 on routine dialysis blood tests)
  • Acute infective illness
  • Significant current or past medical or psychiatric history, or use of medications, that, in the opinion of the Investigators, contraindicates their participation, due to influence on outcome measures.
  • Patients lacking capacity or unable to consent and non-English language speakers
  • Contra-indication to MRI imaging e.g. metal insert, pacemaker
  • Claustrophobia
  • Patients currently participating in an active CTIMP trial, or within 4 half-lives of last administration of CTIMP product
  • Serious mental illness (e.g. bipolar disorder, schizophrenia)
  • Current alcohol or drug dependence

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Healthy Control
Healthy control
Haemodialysis %IDWG >4%
Patient on regular haemodialysis with average IDWG >4%
Routine haemodialysis session
Haemodialysis %IDWG <4%
Patient on regular haemodialysis with average IDWG <4%
Routine haemodialysis session

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in regional brain BOLD signal during tasting of soup of differing salt concentrations (vs. artificial saliva) pre dialysis session verse post dialysis session
Time Frame: 1 week (maximal time between pre and post dialysis scan)
Regional brain BOLD signal during tasting of soup of differing salt concentrations (vs. artificial saliva) ROI including insula, amygdala, ventral tegmental area, pre frontal cortex,
1 week (maximal time between pre and post dialysis scan)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in ratings of salt liking and intensity across different salt concentrations of soup
Time Frame: 1 week (maximal time between pre and post dialysis scan)
Ratings of liking, via Labelled Hedonic Scale (LHS) (-100=Most disliked sensation imaginable, 0=neural, 100=Most liked sensation imaginable), of salted soup of 2 concentrations pre dialysis session verse post dialysis session
1 week (maximal time between pre and post dialysis scan)
Change in ratings of sweet liking and intensity pre dialysis session verse post dialysis session
Time Frame: 1 week (maximal time between pre and post dialysis scan)
Ratings of liking and intensity, via Labelled Hedonic Scale (LHS) (-100=Most disliked sensation imaginable, 0=neural, 100=Most liked sensation imaginable), of sucralose solution
1 week (maximal time between pre and post dialysis scan)
Ratings of sour liking and intensity
Time Frame: 1 week (maximal time between pre and post dialysis scan)
Rating of liking and intensity, via Labelled Hedonic Scale (LHS) (-100=Most disliked sensation imaginable, 0=neural, 100=Most liked sensation imaginable) of citrate pre dialysis session verse post dialysis session
1 week (maximal time between pre and post dialysis scan)
Salt threshold testing
Time Frame: 1 week (maximal time between pre and post dialysis scan)
The lowest concentration of saline solution detected by taste. pre dialysis session verse post dialysis session
1 week (maximal time between pre and post dialysis scan)
Arterial spin labelling
Time Frame: 1 week (maximal time between pre and post dialysis scan)
arterial spin labelling measurement of regional cerebral blood flow at rest pre dialysis session verse post dialysis session
1 week (maximal time between pre and post dialysis scan)
cerebral vascular reactivity pre dialysis session verse post dialysis session
Time Frame: 1 week (maximal time between pre and post dialysis scan)
BOLD signal changes during breath hold to assess BOLD signal reactivity to increased CO2 concentrations
1 week (maximal time between pre and post dialysis scan)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eleanor C Sandhu, MBBS, Imperial College London
  • Study Director: Tony Goldstone, MRCP PhD, Imperial College London

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 17, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 4, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 8, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 14, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dialysis

Clinical Trials on haemodialysis

3
Subscribe