Trial Using CogWatch for Tea Making Training in Stroke Apraxia and Action Disorganisation Syndrome (CogWatchTea)

August 5, 2019 updated by: University of Birmingham

Randomised Controlled Trial of a Task Model Approach (CogWatch) to Tea Making Training in Stroke Apraxia and Action Disorganisation Syndrome

Apraxia and action disorganization syndrome after stroke can disrupt activities of daily living (ADL). Occupational therapy has been effective in improving ADL performance, however, inclusion of multiple tasks means it is unclear which therapy elements contribute to improvement. This study evaluates the efficacy of a task model approach to ADL rehabilitation, comparing training in making a cup of tea with a gait training control condition.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Apraxia and action disorganization syndrome (AADS) after stroke can disrupt activities of daily living (ADLs). Occupational therapy has been effective in improving ADL performance, however, inclusion of multiple tasks means it is unclear which therapy elements contribute to improvement.

This trial evaluates the efficacy of a task model approach to ADL rehabilitation, comparing training in making a cup of tea with a stepping training control condition.

Stroke survivors with AADS participate in a cross-over randomized controlled study. Participants attend five 1-hour tea making training sessions in which progress is monitored and feedback given using a computer-based system which implements a Markov Decision Process (MDP) task model (CogWatch). In a control condition participants receive five 1-hour stepping sessions.

Analysis compares tea making training with stepping training effects on error reduction and time taken in making 4 different tea types. A complex tea preparation task (making two different cups of tea simultaneously) is used to test for generalisation of training effects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

29

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • greater than 2 months post stroke; medically stable; failing at least one of four praxis items in the Birmingham Cognitive Screen (BCoS) or a document filing task.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • recent stroke (less than 2 months post stroke); not medically stable

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Tea making followed by stepping
Five 1-hour weekly tea making training sessions in which progress is monitored and feedback given using a computer-based system that implements a Markov Decision Process (MDP) task model (CogWatch) is followed after a 3-week break by a control condition in which participants receive five 1-hour weekly stepping training sessions.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Stepping followed by tea making
A control condition comprising five 1-hour weekly stepping training sessions is followed after a 3-week break by five 1-hour weekly tea making training sessions in which progress is monitored and feedback given using a computer-based system that implements a Markov Decision Process (MDP) task model (COgWatch)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in tea making accuracy
Time Frame: 3 assessments over 12 weeks

In three assessment sessions (initial, post-phase 1 training, post-phase 2 training), participants are seated at a table with objects and ingredients required for making a cup of tea placed in standard positions. Participants are instructed to make 8 cups of tea, one at a time, comprising two of each of the following; black tea, black tea with sugar, tea with milk and tea with milk and sugar. Each trial is recorded with a video camera.

Videos of the participants making simple tea are analysed by a researcher blinded to the session definition. The summed errors across the 8 tea making trials at each assessment are used to provide a measure of accuracy for each participant.

Change in tea making accuracy pre- and post-training of tea making is contrasted with change in tea making accuracy pre- and post-training of stepping.

3 assessments over 12 weeks
Change in tea making speed
Time Frame: 3 assessments over 12 weeks

In three assessment sessions (initial, post-phase 1 training, post-phase 2 training), participants are seated at a table with objects and ingredients required for making a cup of tea placed in standard positions. Participants are instructed to make 8 cups of tea, one at a time, comprising two of each of the following; black tea, black tea with sugar, tea with milk and tea with milk and sugar. Each trial is recorded with a video camera.

Videos of the participants making simple tea are analysed by a researcher blinded to the session definition. The average completion time is used as a measure of speed for each participant.

Change in tea making speed pre- and post-training of tea making is contrasted with change in tea making speed pre- and post-training of stepping.

3 assessments over 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tea making accuracy at follow-up
Time Frame: 2 assessments over 15 weeks

In a fourth, follow-up assessment session (7 or 15 weeks post-tea making training), participants are seated at a table with objects and ingredients required for making a cup of tea placed in standard positions. Participants are instructed to make 8 cups of tea, one at a time, comprising two of each of the following; black tea, black tea with sugar, tea with milk and tea with milk and sugar. Each trial is recorded with a video camera.

Videos of the participants making simple tea are analysed by a researcher blinded to the session definition. The summed errors across the 8 tea making trials at each assessment are used to provide a measure of accuracy for each participant.

Tea making accuracy at follow-up is compared with tea making accuracy post-training of tea making.

2 assessments over 15 weeks
Change in complex tea making accuracy
Time Frame: 3 assessments over 12 weeks

In three assessment sessions (initial, post-phase 1 training, post-phase 2 training), participants are seated at a table with objects and ingredients required for making two cups of tea placed in standard positions. Participants are instructed to make 4 cups of tea, two at a time, comprising one cup with tea, lemon and 1 sugar cube and the other with tea, milk and 2 sweeteners. Each trial is recorded with a video camera.

Videos of the participants making complex tea are analysed by a researcher blinded to the session definition. The summed errors across the 4 tea making trials at each assessment are used to provide a measure of accuracy for each participant.

Change in complex tea making accuracy pre- and post-training of tea making is contrasted with change in complex tea making accuracy pre- and post-training of stepping.

3 assessments over 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alan M WIng, PhD, Professor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 4, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 4, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 5, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 5, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 7, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Task model (CogWatch)

3
Subscribe