Endovascular Treatment of Aorto-iliac Disease Using in Situ Fenestration (PREFISIT)

December 3, 2020 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
In situ fenestration (ISF) could represent an alternative in the treatment of aorto-iliac disease when usual techniques are not available. The aim of this study was to present the results of ISF in aorto-iliac disease. Data will retrospectively be analyzed. Inclusion criteria will be: a surgical abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with an unsuitable anatomy for a standard endograft, aorto-iliac occlusion with narrow distal aorta (<14mm). Technically, after placement of the endograft, a transjugular intrahepatic access set was used to perform ISF. The hole was secondary enlarged using a cutting or non-compliant balloon. Finally, a kissing stent was performed to the aorto- uni-iliac into a bifurcated endograft.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

ISF are mainly described at the level of the aortic arch. Different means are reported to perforate the graft: the mechanical (needles, transjugular intra hepatic access needles or guidewires) or physical (laser and radiofrequency catheters).

ISF could be an alternative in the endovascular treatment of aorto iliac disease including both occlusive and aneurysmal pathologies. In this cases, when a narrow distal aorta is present conventional technique as CERAB, bifurcated endograft are challenging. In situ fenestrations allows conversion of an aorto-uni-iliac endograft into a bifurcated endograft, thereby avoiding crossover femorofemoral bypass and its complications.

The aim of the study was to report the results of ISF technique at the level of the abdominal aorta.

Inclusion criteria will be: a surgical abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with an unsuitable anatomy for a standard endograft, aorto-iliac occlusion with narrow distal aorta (<14mm).

All patients had a preoperative CT scan to assess the anatomy of the abdominal aorta.

All patients received an oral antiplatelet agent(aspirin(75-250md/dl) or clopidogrel (75md/dl) and a statin before the procedure.

In situ fenestration technique The procedure was performed under general anesthesia and guided with a mobile C-arm (Siemens). The less diseased and tortuous iliac axis was used to introduce the endograft and the contralateral side as used for the in situ fenestration.

Whenever possible, the procedure was carried out percutaneously with the preclosure technique using Proglide vascular devices for the two common femoral artery retrograde punctures.

The first step consisted in placing an endograft from a retrograde femoral access. The endograft was deployed in a standard fashion. The distal security wire was not released to maintain the control on the distal part of the endograft and keep the graft straight while performing the fenestration. A transjugular intrahepatic access needle was introduced in a 9F Flexor introducer through a contralateral femoral access. When the top of the introducer was at the level of the aortic bifurcation, the dilatator of the introducer was removed, and the introducer was pushed up to the endograft. Contact between the introducer and the endograft was ensured by observing a slight deformation of the endograft while pushing the introducer.

The needle was advanced and the endograft is punctured at the level of the aortic bifurcation. The hole created was secondary enlarged using cutting or high pressure balloon. A long sheath is advanced intro the fenestration to control the success of the technique.

A kissing stent using balloon expandable covered stents is finally performed to stabilize the repair.

Control angiography confirm the patency of the stents and the absence of early endoleak in case of endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Boulogne-Billancourt, France, 92100
        • Service de Chirurgie Vasculaire, Hôpital Ambroise Paré

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 90 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients have been operated with in situ fenestration between 2014 and 2019.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Underwent in situ fenestration treatment between 2014 and 2019

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient aged < 40 years or > 90 years
  • Under guardianship

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary Patency
Time Frame: at 1 month
Evaluate primary patency at 1 month after in situ fenestration by CT angiography.
at 1 month
Primary Patency
Time Frame: at 1 month
Evaluate primary patency at 1 month after in situ fenestration by doppler ultrasound.
at 1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary Patency
Time Frame: at 6 and 12 month
Evaluate secondary patency at 6 and 12 month after in situ fenestration by CT angiography.
at 6 and 12 month
Secondary Patency
Time Frame: at 6 and 12 month
Evaluate secondary patency at 6 and 12 month after in situ fenestration by doppler ultrasound.
at 6 and 12 month
Technical success
Time Frame: at baseline
Technical success was achieved when the perforation of the endograft was performed with the needle. Technical success will be measured as a ratio between the number of successfull perforation and the number of attempts.
at baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Raphaël COSCAS, MD, PhD, Service de Chirurgie Vasculaire, Hôpital Ambroise Paré
  • Study Director: Jérémie JAYET, MD, Service de Chirurgie Vasculaire, Hôpital Ambroise Paré

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 27, 2020

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 2, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 2, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 1, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 20, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 7, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peripheral Artery Disease

3
Subscribe