Heart Rate Variability as an Indicator Associated With the Improvement of Dysmenorrhea After the Warm-water Footbath

August 26, 2019 updated by: Camillians Saint Mary's Hospital Luodong

The effect of warm-water footbath in improving primary dysmenorrhea (PD) was rarely investigated previously. We aimed to exam the hypothesis that warm-water footbath is effective to reduce the pain of PD, and the effect is associated with changes in the autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity.

The quasi-experimental study was carried out enrolling 68 college students) with PD. The enrolled participants were randomized into two groups and received interventions (footbath (n=35) versus sitting only (n=33)) for 20 minutes per day on their menstruation days 1 and 2.

After the interventions, we analyzed the association among intervention (with footbath versus without footbath), heart rate variability (HRV) changes and changes of pain scales (Pain Visual Analog Scale and short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Dysmenorrhea is the most common gynecological condition affecting 16% to 95% of adolescents and young women, and reduce their quality of life. Primary dysmenorrhea (PD), a term denoting the dysmenorrhea in the absence of underlying pathology, is commonly referred to as period pain or menstrual cramps by the lay press and public.

The effect of warm-water footbath in improving primary dysmenorrhea (PD) was rarely investigated previously. We aimed to exam the hypothesis that warm-water footbath is effective to reduce the pain of PD, and the effect is associated with changes in the autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity.

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Saint Mary Hospital Luodong (SMHIRB102015).

This study with a quasi-experimental design was conducted in a nursing college in Northern Taiwan during the study period from December 1, 2013, to June 30, 2014. Participants were eligible for enrollment if they: (1) were healthy female students aged 16-20 years of the nursing college; (2) had regular menstrual cycles; (3) experienced dysmenorrhea within 6 months before the enrollment; (4) had dysmenorrhea with severity higher than five scores of the pain visual analog scale (PVAS); and (5) had no experience of pregnancy. The exclusion criteria included individuals whom: (1) had irregular menstrual cycles; (2) had circulation problem of legs such as peripheral arterial occlusive disease or deep vein thrombosis; (3) had wounds or skin lesions over legs; and (4) had taken any medications which affect ANS activity. The suggested participant's number estimated by the G-Power was 34 when setting the calculated power as 0.8 and α as 0.05. Considering participant loss during the study process, we decided to enroll 68 participants.

All enrolled participants were randomized into the footbath group (n=35) and control group (n=33). The baseline demographic data, as well as relevant information about menstrual cycles and dysmenorrhea of all participants, were documented at enrollment. All the participants were arranged to stay in an air-conditioned, quiet room from 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. on their menstruation days 1 and 2. After sitting quietly for 20 minutes, the participants in the "footbath group" received legs soaking from the heel to the Sanyinjiao (SP6) acupoint (above the ankle) 24 in 42 ℃ water with air bubbles and vibration given to the soles for 20 minutes, whereas the participants in the "control group" kept on sitting quietly without legs soaking during the additional 20-minute period.

PVAS and Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) were fulfilled as pain assessment by all participants twice, including a "pre-test" before the intervention of menstruation day 1 and a "post-test" after the intervention of menstruation day 2.

HRV was measured at four time points (before and immediately after the interventions on days 1 and 2) to assess ANS function for all participants.

The interventions were "warm-water footbath for 20 minutes" for the "footbath group" and "sitting quietly without footbath for 20 minutes" for the "control group." Then we evaluated the influence of warm-water footbath on dysmenorrhea and several variables, including HRV indices and stiffness index.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

68

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 16 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. healthy female students aged 16-20 years of the nursing college;
  2. had regular menstrual cycles;
  3. experienced dysmenorrhea within 6 months before the enrollment;
  4. had dysmenorrhea with severity higher than five scores of the pain visual analog scale (PVAS); and
  5. had no experience of pregnancy.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. had irregular menstrual cycles;
  2. had circulation problem of legs such as peripheral arterial occlusive disease or deep vein thrombosis;
  3. had wounds or skin lesions over legs; and
  4. had taken any medications which affect ANS activity.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Footbath group
All the participants were arranged to stay in an air-conditioned, quiet room from 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. on their menstruation days 1 and 2. After sitting quietly for 20 minutes, the participants in the "footbath group" received legs soaking from the heel to the Sanyinjiao (SP6) acupoint (above the ankle) 24 in 42 ℃ water with air bubbles and vibration given to the soles for 20 minutes,
All the participants in the intervention group were arranged to stay in an air-conditioned, quiet room from 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. on their menstruation days 1 and 2. After sitting quietly for 20 minutes, the participants in the "footbath group" received legs soaking from the heel to the Sanyinjiao (SP6) acupoint (above the ankle) 24 in 42 ℃ water with air bubbles and vibration given to the soles for 20 minutes, whereas the participants in the "control group" kept on sitting quietly without legs soaking during the additional 20-minute period.
No Intervention: Control group
All the participants were arranged to stay in an air-conditioned, quiet room from 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. on their menstruation days 1 and 2. After sitting quietly for 20 minutes, whereas the participants in the "control group" kept on sitting quietly without legs soaking during the additional 20-minute period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain visual analog scale, pre-test
Time Frame: Before the intervention of menstruation day 1
Pain visual analog scale was fulfilled as pain assessment before the intervention of menstruation day 1. The pain visual analog scale uses the 10 cm horizontal scale with verbal descriptors, the pain intensity could be graded from "no pain" (score of 0)" to "worst imaginable pain" (score of 10).
Before the intervention of menstruation day 1
Pain visual analog scale, post-test
Time Frame: After the intervention of menstruation day 2
Pain visual analog scale was fulfilled as pain assessment after the intervention of menstruation day 2. The pain visual analog scale uses the 10 cm horizontal scale with verbal descriptors, the pain intensity could be graded from "no pain" (score of 0)" to "worst imaginable pain" (score of 10).
After the intervention of menstruation day 2
Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, pre-test
Time Frame: Before the intervention of menstruation day 1
Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire was fulfilled as pain assessment before the intervention of menstruation day 1. It consists of 15 descriptors including 11 descriptors in the sensory subscale and four descriptors in the affective subscale. The pain intensity is scored from "none" (score 0) to "severe" (score 3) for each descriptor, summing the total pain rate index score of 0-45.
Before the intervention of menstruation day 1
Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, post-test
Time Frame: After the intervention of menstruation day 2
Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire was fulfilled as pain assessment after the intervention of menstruation day 2. It consists of 15 descriptors including 11 descriptors in the sensory subscale and four descriptors in the affective subscale. The pain intensity is scored from "none" (score 0) to "severe" (score 3) for each descriptor, summing the total pain rate index score of 0-45.
After the intervention of menstruation day 2
Heart rate variability, pre-test of day 1
Time Frame: Before the interventions on day 1
Heart rate variability was measured before the interventions on day 1 to assess autonomic nervous function for all participants. Under a sampling rate of 512 Hz, signals from a lead I electrocardiogram were documented by an 8-bit analog-to-digital converter. Fast Fourier transformation was utilized to perform power spectral analysis, which quantified the power spectrum into the standard frequency-domain measurements, including LF (0.04-0.15 Hz), HF (0.15-0.40 Hz) and LF/HF ratio.
Before the interventions on day 1
Heart rate variability, post-test of day 1
Time Frame: After the interventions on day 1
Heart rate variability was measured after the interventions on day 1 to assess autonomic nervous function for all participants. Under a sampling rate of 512 Hz, signals from a lead I electrocardiogram were documented by an 8-bit analog-to-digital converter. Fast Fourier transformation was utilized to perform power spectral analysis, which quantified the power spectrum into the standard frequency-domain measurements, including LF (0.04-0.15 Hz), HF (0.15-0.40 Hz) and LF/HF ratio.
After the interventions on day 1
Heart rate variability, pre-test of day 2
Time Frame: Before the interventions on day 2
Heart rate variability was measured before the interventions on day 2 to assess autonomic nervous function for all participants. Under a sampling rate of 512 Hz, signals from a lead I electrocardiogram were documented by an 8-bit analog-to-digital converter. Fast Fourier transformation was utilized to perform power spectral analysis, which quantified the power spectrum into the standard frequency-domain measurements, including LF (0.04-0.15 Hz), HF (0.15-0.40 Hz) and LF/HF ratio.
Before the interventions on day 2
Heart rate variability, post-test of day 2
Time Frame: After the interventions on day 2
Heart rate variability was measured after the interventions on day 2 to assess autonomic nervous function for all participants. Under a sampling rate of 512 Hz, signals from a lead I electrocardiogram were documented by an 8-bit analog-to-digital converter. Fast Fourier transformation was utilized to perform power spectral analysis, which quantified the power spectrum into the standard frequency-domain measurements, including LF (0.04-0.15 Hz), HF (0.15-0.40 Hz) and LF/HF ratio.
After the interventions on day 2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Wu Shih-Ju, Saint Mary's Hospital Luodong

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 15, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 6, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Primary Dysmenorrhea

Clinical Trials on warm-water footbath

Subscribe