Unna Boots for Ankle Fracture Swelling

January 8, 2021 updated by: Medical University of South Carolina

Unna Boot: A Technique to Decrease Preoperative Soft Tissue Swelling Following Ankle Fractures

This study will evaluate the difference in soft tissue swelling prior to surgery and wound complications after surgery between unna boot application versus standard splint application. An unna boot is an extra zinc covered wrap around your leg followed by standard splint application (cotton dressing, plaster, then soft dressing). Prior to surgery the participant's swelling will be measured and compared to the standard splint application group. After surgery, the participant will be monitored for wound complications, pain, and range of motion.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to compare preoperative swelling and frequency of wound complications in ankle fractures through standard splint and an unna boot compressive dressing with a splint. Quantitative and qualitative measurements will be analyzed to compare edema and wound complications. Secondary goals are to evaluate the quantitative differences in ankle range of motion and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores. The hypothesis of this proposed study is that there will be less soft tissue swelling and wound complications with the use of an unna boot when compared to the standard splint. The investigators also hypothesize that there will be improved ankle range of motion and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores with the use of an unna boot when compared to a standard splint. Participants will be randomized to either the standard splint or an unna boot and quantitative and qualitative measures will be collected. This data could change the practice for preoperative management of soft tissue swelling following ankle fractures.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • acute ankle fracture

Exclusion Criteria:

  • low energy ankle fracture
  • open ankle fracture
  • unwillingness to participate
  • allergy to zinc
  • revision surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control Group
Patients will not receive compression dressing
Experimental: Experimental Group
Patients will receive compression dressing
The unna boot is a zinc coated compression dressing

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Baseline swelling using Figure-8 Measurement
Time Frame: Baseline (Initial encounter)
Physician uses tape measure to measure angles to determine swelling severity of ankle. This measurement is taken by making a figure eight pattern on the foot and ankle. The measurement is taken three times and then averaged to give the final total.
Baseline (Initial encounter)
Mean swelling using Figure-8 Measurement
Time Frame: 6 weeks follow up visit
Physician uses tape measure to measure angles to determine swelling severity of ankle. This measurement is taken by making a figure eight pattern on the foot and ankle. The measurement is taken three times and then averaged to give the final total.
6 weeks follow up visit
Mean pain scores on visual analogue scale at initial encounter
Time Frame: Baseline (initial encounter)
patients report a pain score of 1-10. 1 being the lowest and 10 being the highest
Baseline (initial encounter)
Mean pain scores on visual analogue scale at 6 week follow up visit
Time Frame: 6 weeks follow up visit
patients report a pain score of 1-10. 1 being the lowest and 10 being the highest
6 weeks follow up visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christopher E Gross, M.D., Orthopaedic Surgeon

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 31, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 10, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 12, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 12, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 00092143

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ankle Fractures

Clinical Trials on Unna Boot

3
Subscribe