- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04086927
Unna Boots for Ankle Fracture Swelling
January 8, 2021 updated by: Medical University of South Carolina
Unna Boot: A Technique to Decrease Preoperative Soft Tissue Swelling Following Ankle Fractures
This study will evaluate the difference in soft tissue swelling prior to surgery and wound complications after surgery between unna boot application versus standard splint application.
An unna boot is an extra zinc covered wrap around your leg followed by standard splint application (cotton dressing, plaster, then soft dressing).
Prior to surgery the participant's swelling will be measured and compared to the standard splint application group.
After surgery, the participant will be monitored for wound complications, pain, and range of motion.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
The purpose of this study is to compare preoperative swelling and frequency of wound complications in ankle fractures through standard splint and an unna boot compressive dressing with a splint.
Quantitative and qualitative measurements will be analyzed to compare edema and wound complications.
Secondary goals are to evaluate the quantitative differences in ankle range of motion and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores.
The hypothesis of this proposed study is that there will be less soft tissue swelling and wound complications with the use of an unna boot when compared to the standard splint.
The investigators also hypothesize that there will be improved ankle range of motion and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores with the use of an unna boot when compared to a standard splint.
Participants will be randomized to either the standard splint or an unna boot and quantitative and qualitative measures will be collected.
This data could change the practice for preoperative management of soft tissue swelling following ankle fractures.
Study Type
Interventional
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- acute ankle fracture
Exclusion Criteria:
- low energy ankle fracture
- open ankle fracture
- unwillingness to participate
- allergy to zinc
- revision surgery
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: Control Group
Patients will not receive compression dressing
|
|
Experimental: Experimental Group
Patients will receive compression dressing
|
The unna boot is a zinc coated compression dressing
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Baseline swelling using Figure-8 Measurement
Time Frame: Baseline (Initial encounter)
|
Physician uses tape measure to measure angles to determine swelling severity of ankle.
This measurement is taken by making a figure eight pattern on the foot and ankle.
The measurement is taken three times and then averaged to give the final total.
|
Baseline (Initial encounter)
|
Mean swelling using Figure-8 Measurement
Time Frame: 6 weeks follow up visit
|
Physician uses tape measure to measure angles to determine swelling severity of ankle.
This measurement is taken by making a figure eight pattern on the foot and ankle.
The measurement is taken three times and then averaged to give the final total.
|
6 weeks follow up visit
|
Mean pain scores on visual analogue scale at initial encounter
Time Frame: Baseline (initial encounter)
|
patients report a pain score of 1-10. 1 being the lowest and 10 being the highest
|
Baseline (initial encounter)
|
Mean pain scores on visual analogue scale at 6 week follow up visit
Time Frame: 6 weeks follow up visit
|
patients report a pain score of 1-10. 1 being the lowest and 10 being the highest
|
6 weeks follow up visit
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Christopher E Gross, M.D., Orthopaedic Surgeon
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
January 31, 2021
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
January 1, 2022
Study Completion (Anticipated)
January 1, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 10, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 11, 2019
First Posted (Actual)
September 12, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
January 12, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 8, 2021
Last Verified
January 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 00092143
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Ankle Fractures
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...AO Trauma North AmericaCompletedDisplaced Ankle FracturesUnited States
-
Hadassah Medical OrganizationCompleted
-
Zimmer BiometCompletedStress Fracture | Insufficiency Fractures | Stress Fracture, Ankle, Foot and ToesUnited States, Canada
-
University of ArizonaRecruitingUnstable Ankle Fractures With Syndesmotic DisruptionUnited States
-
Encore Medical, L.P.RecruitingBimalleolar Ankle FracturesUnited States
-
Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteUnknownAnkle Injuries | Fracture, Ankle
-
Ministry of Health, KuwaitNot yet recruiting
-
Petr RoutnerRecruitingAnkle Injuries | Ankle Fractures | Ankle Sprains | Ankle Edema | Ankle ImpingementCzechia
-
Ostfold Hospital TrustRecruitingAnkle Fracture, Trimalleolar | Ankle Fracture, BimalleolarNorway
-
University of UtahCompletedAnkle FractureUnited States
Clinical Trials on Unna Boot
-
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto AlegreConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Casex Innovation...Completed
-
Instituto Dante Pazzanese de CardiologiaFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloCompletedMay-Thurner Syndrome | Iliac Vein Obstruction | Cockett SyndromeBrazil
-
Medical Corps, Israel Defense ForceCompletedBack Pain | Blister | Ankle Sprain | Stress Fracture | Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome | Abrasion
-
University of Southern CaliforniaBaylor College of MedicineRecruiting
-
University of British ColumbiaRecruitingInfarction | Cardiovascular Diseases | Vascular Diseases | Stroke | Cerebrovascular Disorders | Brain Diseases | Central Nervous System Diseases | Nervous System Diseases | Brain Ischemia | Cerebral Infarction | Brain InfarctionCanada
-
Arizona State UniversityWashington State UniversityEnrolling by invitationLanguage Disorders in Children | Classic Galactosemia | Speech Disorders in ChildrenUnited States
-
Universidad de ZaragozaCompletedBone Density | Physical Fitness | SoccerSpain
-
University of KansasUniversity of Missouri-ColumbiaWithdrawnIntensive Care
-
NYU Langone HealthCompletedAnkle FractureUnited States