Short Clinical Outcome of Microscope Assisted Discectomy: Results of 90 Cases in Iraq

September 27, 2019 updated by: Sherwan Ahmed Ali Hamawandi, Hawler Medical University
A total of (90) patients involved in this study a randomized sampling use. The adult patient between (17) and (50) years of age complaining of lower back pain; and or radiculopathy and neurological symptoms, whom failed to respond to a (6-8) weeks period of conservative therapy (life style modification, NSAIDs, and physiotherapy). They are operated by Microscopic assisted discectomy and were followed by ODI and VAS for back pain and leg pain for 4 months after surgery

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A total of (90) patients involved in this study a randomized sampling use. The adult patient between (17) and (50) years of age complaining of lower back pain; and or radiculopathy and neurological symptoms, whom failed to respond to a (6-8) weeks period of conservative therapy (life style modification, NSAIDs, and physiotherapy). The diagnosis carried out using history, physical examination, MRI done for the patient to confirm the diagnosis and the level of disc herniation and know the direction and extend of disc herniation.Population excluded from study were the age group above or less the ones whom involved in the study, any other type of disc herniation apart from L3-L4, L4-L5, L5-S1, multilevel pathology, patients with spondylolisthesis, spondylolysis, patients with scoliosis and kyphosis, patients with cauda equina syndrome, patients with previous back surgery, and with no local infection.All the patients discharged on the same day of operation or a day after, mobilized soon as they were ready. Patient were reviewed in intervals of (2) weeks (2) months and (4) months after surgery using VAS for low back pain and leg pain and Oswestry disability index.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years to 50 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • lower back pain; and or radiculopathy and neurological symptoms, whom failed to respond to a (6-8) weeks period of conservative therapy (life style modification, NSAIDs, and physiotherapy).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Population excluded from study were the age group above or less the ones whom involved in the study, any other type of disc herniation apart from L3-L4, L4-L5, L5-S1, multilevel pathology, patients with spondylolisthesis, spondylolysis, patients with scoliosis and kyphosis, patients with cauda equina syndrome, patients with previous back surgery, and with no local infection.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Patients with Lumbar disc herniation
Patients with lumbar disc herniation with no response to conservative treatment and were treated with Microdiscectomy
Microdiscectomy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analogue score for back and leg pain
Time Frame: Visual analogue score was assessed in all patients preoperatively and then assessed postoperatively at 2 weeks , 2 months and 4 months which showed that there is changes after operation which indicates improvement by Microdiscectomy
Visual analogue score for back pan and leg pain is measurement of patient feeling of pain which can be from 0 (no pain) to 10 ( severe pain )
Visual analogue score was assessed in all patients preoperatively and then assessed postoperatively at 2 weeks , 2 months and 4 months which showed that there is changes after operation which indicates improvement by Microdiscectomy
Oswestry disability index
Time Frame: Oswestry disability index was assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 2 weeks , 2 months and 4 months and showed there is improvement in this index after surgery which indicates improvement with microdiscecetomy

Oswestry disability index is low back pain questionnaire as followingFor each section the total possible score is 5: if the first statement is marked the section score = 0; if the last statement is marked, it = 5. If all 10 sections are completed the score is calculated as follows:

Example: 16 (total scored) 50 (total possible score) x 100 = 32% If one section is missed or not applicable the score is calculated: 16 (total scored) 45 (total possible score) x 100 = 35.5% Minimum detectable change (90% confidence): 10% points (change of less than this may be attributable to error in the measurement)

Oswestry disability index was assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 2 weeks , 2 months and 4 months and showed there is improvement in this index after surgery which indicates improvement with microdiscecetomy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 10, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 30, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 30, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on To Evaluate the Effectiveness if Microscope in Discectomy

Clinical Trials on Microscope assisted discectomy

Subscribe