Conservative Versus Aggressive Discectomy for Primary Disc Herniation With Radiculopathy

September 16, 2010 updated by: Sun Yat-sen University

A Prospective Randomized Trails for Primary Disc Herniation With Radiculopathy:Conservative Versus Aggressive Discectomy

Summary: This is a prospective randomize study to compare conservative and aggressive discectomy for treatment of disc herniation with radiculopathy.

Study hypothesis: The investigators believe that conservative discectomy could preserve a higher disc space and has a better long-term outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

objectives:to compare the effect of two type surgery(conservative discectomy and aggressive discectomy)on disc herniation with radiculopathy after long-term follow-up.

methods:the patients who were confirmed suffer from disc herniation with radiculopathy and failed to nonsurgical treatment will be divided into two groups, and will be follow up 3~6 years for seeking the effect on disc space preservation and recurrent.

outcome measures:the rate of pain release and patients satisfaction were measured by SF-36,ODI,VAS,score post-OP. the height of disc was measured on X-ray film by the end point.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510120
        • Recruiting
        • Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Dongsheng Huang, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Duration of symptoms: 6 or more weeks.
  • Treatments tried: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medical therapy and physical therapy.
  • Surgical screening: Persistent radicular pain provoked by moderate exercise, sitting, increased abdominal pressure, decreased mobility, list (scoliosis), straight leg raising.
  • Tests: MRI to confirm diagnosis and level(s).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous lumbar spine surgery.
  • Not a surgical candidate for any of these reasons: Overall health which makes spinal surgery too life-threatening to be an appropriate alternative, dramatic improvement with conservative care, or inability (for any reason) to undergo surgery within 6 months.
  • Possible pregnancy.
  • Active malignancy: A patient with a history of any invasive malignancy (except non-melanoma skin cancer) is ineligible unless he or she has been treated with a curative intent AND there has been no clinical signs or symptoms of the malignancy for at least 5 years.
  • Current fracture, infection, and/or deformity (greater than 15 degrees of lumbar scoliosis, using Cobb measure technique) of the spine.
  • Age less than 18 years.
  • Cauda Equina syndrome or progressive neurological deficit (usually requiring urgent surgery).
  • Unavailability for follow-up (planning to move, no telephone, etc.) or inability to complete data surveys.
  • Symptoms less than 6 weeks.
  • Patient currently enrolled in any experimental "spine related" study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CS
conservative discectomy
a smaller incision with removal of the disc fragment with little invasion of the disc
Active Comparator: AS
a large open incision with aggressive removal of the disc fragments and curettage of the disc space

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
patients satisfaction
Time Frame: 6 weeks after intervention
6 weeks after intervention
patients satisfaction
Time Frame: 3 months after intervention
3 months after intervention
patients satisfaction
Time Frame: 6 months after intervention
6 months after intervention
patients satisfaction
Time Frame: 1st year after intervention
1st year after intervention
patients satisfaction
Time Frame: 3rd year after intervention
3rd year after intervention
patients satisfaction
Time Frame: 5th year after intervention
5th year after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
recurrence rate of disc herniation
Time Frame: 6 weeks after operation
6 weeks after operation
recurrence rate of disc herniation
Time Frame: 3 months after operation
3 months after operation
recurrence rate of disc herniation
Time Frame: 6 months after operation
6 months after operation
recurrence rate of disc herniation
Time Frame: 1st year after operation
1st year after operation
recurrence rate of disc herniation
Time Frame: 3rd year after operation
3rd year after operation
recurrence rate of disc herniation
Time Frame: 5th year after operation
5th year after operation
height of disc space
Time Frame: 6 weeks after operation
6 weeks after operation
height of disc space
Time Frame: 3 months after operation
3 months after operation
height of disc space
Time Frame: 6 months after operation
6 months after operation
height of disc operation
Time Frame: 1st year after operation
1st year after operation
height of disc space
Time Frame: 3rd year after operation
3rd year after operation
height of disc space
Time Frame: 5th year after operation
5th year after operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dongsheng Huang, MD, Sun Yat-sen University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

September 17, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 17, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2010

Last Verified

August 1, 2007

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Herniated Disc

Clinical Trials on conservative discectomy

Subscribe