Medical Imaging of Cachexia

A Pilot Bioimaging Trial of Cancer Cachexia

This is a pilot trial using 18F-FDG PET and DXA scans to determine whether these investigations are objective tools to assess cachexia.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

This pilot study will establish the differences in BAT uptake of 18F-FDG in cachectic and non-cachectic cancer patients using PET imaging.

Patients willbe assessed for sarcopenia using a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry or bone densitometry scan (DXA). Given the variables which may affect uptake of BAT in cancer patients, this study will standardise patient preparation and PET scan procedure in order to obtain the most reliable assessment of BAT activity in all patients on study.

It is hypothesisd that use of this PET imaging technique, which is part of standard care to assess cancer progression, may assist clinicians in early identification of metabolic changes in a patient, with potential for early intervention and utility in monitoring success of treatments of cachexia.

A total of 40 patients will be evaluated, 20 patients with advanced/metastatic colorectal, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or pancreatic cancer without cachexia, and 20 patients with advanced/metastatic colorectal, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), or pancreatic cancer with documented cachexia, all of whom are referred for standard of care 18F-FDG PET scans.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Victoria
      • Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia, 3078
        • Recruiting
        • Austin Health
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Hui Gan
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Andrew Scott
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sze Ting Lee

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with malignant disease;
  • ECOG Performance score of 0-2;
  • Age ≥ 18 years;
  • Life expectancy of >4 months at screening;
  • Cachexia patient group only: Fulfils diagnostic criteria for cachexia: unintentional weight loss more than 5% over the previous 6 months, or more than 2% in individuals with a decreased body-mass index of <20kg/m2, or skeletal muscle wasting (sarcopenia).

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients with uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus;

  • Psychological unstable persons presumed unfit to perform the investigations;
  • Persons unable to lie or sit still for 1-2 hours;
  • Pregnant patients;
  • Patients who received high doses of radiotherapeutic radiation of the neck and/or upper chest in their medical history limiting nutritional intake;
  • Patients who are receiving any chemotherapeutic agents which is limiting nutritional intake;
  • Persons that received cervical or thoracic sympathectomy or have a nerve dysfunction which is likely to influence sympathetic nerves;
  • The use of medication that influences the sympathetic nerve system: ß-blockers, α-blockers, central anti-hypertensives, certain anti-depression drugs (MAO inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressives), reserpine, cocaine, calcium channel blockers, labetalol, and certain tranquillizers (fenothiazines).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Patients with cancer cachexia
20 patients with advanced/metastatic colorectal, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), or pancreatic cancer with documented cachexia.
18F-FDG PET will be compared with Dexa Scan result within and between arms.
Active Comparator: Patients without cancer cachexia
20 patients with advanced/metastatic colorectal, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or pancreatic cancer without cachexia.
18F-FDG PET will be compared with Dexa Scan result within and between arms.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation of a clinical diagnosis of cachexia with the metabolic activity of brown adipose tissue, bone density and muscle mass.
Time Frame: 7 days post enrollment
Quantitation of the metabolic activity of brown adipose tissue, bone density and muscle mass using 18F-FDG uptake and bone densitometry will be correlated with a diagnosis of clinical cachexia.
7 days post enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Optimization of PET scanning methods for imaging of brown adipose tissue.
Time Frame: 7 days post enrollment
Optimization of the patient environment (ie. ambient temperature) and metabolic state (ie. Heart rate, dietary state) to minimize the impact of these factors and allow direct comparison of metabolic activity of brown adipose tissue between cachectic and non-cachectic patients.
7 days post enrollment
To quantify change from normal of inflammatory blood biomarkers
Time Frame: 7 days post enrollment
To validate change from normal laboratory range of inflammatory blood based proteins and enzymes in cachectic vs non-cachectic patients.
7 days post enrollment
To quantify change from normal of immune blood biomarkers
Time Frame: 7 days post enrollment
To validate change from normal laboratory range immune blood based proteins and enzymes in cachectic vs non-cachectic patients.
7 days post enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andrew M Scott, MD, Austin Health/ONJCRI

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 28, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 28, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 28, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 14, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 16, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Cohort data will be shared via journal and conference presentations

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer Cachexia

Clinical Trials on 18F-FDG PET + Dexa Scan

Subscribe