"Follow-up of Midlines Placed Outside the Intensive Care Unit: What Side Effects? An Observational Study" (MidDATA)

June 26, 2023 updated by: Nantes University Hospital

"Follow-up of Midlines Placed Outside the Intensive Care Unit: What Happens Next, What Side Effects? A Multicenter Observational Study"

Midline catheter is a peripherally-inserted catheter, with the distal tip being placed into the axillary vein. For some indications, it's an alternative to the peripheral insert central catheters in case of limited venous access and infusions less than one month. The Midline catheter is poorly described in scientific literature; therefore, the aim of the study is to determinate the incidence of adverse events (Infections and thrombosis) and risk factors for patients with this device.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The midline is a deep peripheral venous catheter whose insertion is between the lower and upper third of the arm and whose distal end does not extend beyond the axillary vein. It requires the identification of the vein by ultrasound which reserves its installation for professionals trained and authorized to use the ultrasound scanner.

Midline is currently indicated for intravenous treatments > 7 days and in patients with precarious venous capital. According to the manufacturer's instructions, it can be kept in place for up to 30 days, while the recommendations of the Centers disease of control specify that this period could be extended to 49 days.

Its use is expanding rapidly in France, thus meeting the needs of patients who do not require a central line and whose use of a standard peripheral venous catheter is not possible (low venous capital or treatment duration > 7 days). Its installation, essentially carried out by qualified anaesthetists, does not increase medical planning and is therefore an attractive alternative to the installation of a central catheter whose complications (thrombosis and infections) are known.

The only data on the complication rate, estimated at 1-2%, are from low-potency observational studies. In the absence of high-level evidence, most of the good practice recommendations published in 2019 are based on expert consensus.

This leads us to conduct a large-scale observational study to assess the complication rate and identify the associated factors. This study will provide professionals with reliable scientific data for the next review of good practice recommendations.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

2000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nantes, France, 44093
        • Nantes University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients concerned with this study requiring a midline for any indication and hospitalized in a department other than intensive care or intensive care.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patient
  • No opposition to the study
  • Patient requiring a midline

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient in Intensive Care Unit or acute care unit.
  • Patient with a contra indication to midline insertion: arterio-venous fistula, history of axillary lymph node clearance or radiotherapy in the infusion arm, presence of infectious skin lesions near the infusion area, presence of a prosthesis on the infusion arm or hemiplegic arm.
  • Patient under legal protection measure
  • Patient already enrolled
  • Minor patient;
  • Pregnant woman.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
assess numbers of adverse events
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 year
catheter related infection yes/no vein thrombosis yes/no occlusion yes/no exposition time to a midline catheter
through study completion, an average of 2 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 23, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Thrombosis

Clinical Trials on Follow up of midlines

Subscribe