Efficacy of Volume Ventilation in Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure at Risk of Obstructive Apneas or Obesity Hypoventilation (VONIVOO)

April 10, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Rouen

Efficacy of Volume Targeted Pressure Support Ventilation vs. Pressure Support Ventilation in Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure at Risk of Obstructive Apneas or Obesity Hypoventilation

This study compares a volume targeted pressure support non-invasive ventilation with an automatic PEP regulation (AVAPS-AE mode) to a pressure support non-invasive ventilation (S/T mode) in patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure with acidosis. This study focuses on patients at risk of obstructive apneas or obesity-hypoventilation syndrom (BMI≥30 kg/m²). Half of participants (33 patients) will receive non invasive ventilation with AVAPS-AE mode, the other half will receive non-invasive ventilation with S/T mode.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

So far, in respiratory intensive care units, the usual treatment of patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure with acidosis is non-invasive ventilation set with a pressure support mode (S/T or VS/AI mode depending on the ventilator manufacturer).

AVAPS-AE mode is a volume targeted pressure support mode with an automatic PEP. With the forced oscillations method, the ventilator is able to detect the obstruction and the resistances of upper airways.

It allows the ventilator to change its pressure settings to keep the targeted volume and avoid apneas and hypoventilation.

That is why in patients with a BMI > 30 kg/m², at risk of obesity hypoventilation syndrom or obstructive apneas, this ventilation mode may be interesting.

AVAPS-AE has been evaluated in the home ventilation showing it is as efficient as S/T mode in controlling PaCO2.

However it has never been compared to S/T mode in acute respiratory failure care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Rouen, France, 76031
        • CHU Rouen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient of age
  • Patient benefitting of social security
  • Informed patient who signed the information note and the research enlighted consent form
  • Admission in respiratory intensive care unit for an acid-hypercapnic exacerbation (defined by pH≤ 7,35)
  • BMI ≥ 30kg/m2
  • PaCO2 > 6.5 kPa on blood gases at ICU admission

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed COPD with a spirometry (VEMS/CVF < 70%)
  • Pregnant women, or breast-feeding women
  • Patient with a judiciary or administrative liberty deprivation
  • Patients under guardianship
  • Contraindication to NIV

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: AVAPS-AE mode
A volume targeted pressure support ventilation mode
NIV will be setup in AVAPS-AE mode, with a Trilogy ventilation device (Respironics, Murrysville, PA). The range of positive expiratory pressure will be set between 4 and 14 cmH2O. The range of inspiratory pressure support will be set between 14 and 24 cmH2. The target tidal volume will be set to achieve 8 to 10 mL/kg of ideal body weight (Size (m) * Size (m) * 23).
Active Comparator: S/T mode
A pressure support ventilation mode

NIV will be setup in ST mode, with a Trilogy ventilation device (Respironics, Murrysville, PA).

The physician will decide the level of positive expiratory pressure and of pressure support.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Resolution of hypercapnia
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Time between admission and resolution of hypercapnia (≤ 6.5 kPa)
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of persistent apneic events on NIV (/h) during the first night
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Comparison of persistent apneic events on NIV (/h) during the first night (determined with a respiratory polygraph) between S/T mode arm and AVAPS-AE mode arm (determined with an oxymeter)
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Comparison of patient-ventilator asynchronisms during NIV (/h)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Comparison of patient-ventilator asynchronisms during NIV (/h) between S/T mode arm and AVAPS-AE mode arm (determined with ventilator datas and a respiratory polygraph)
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Comparison of time during NIV with a oxygen saturation below 90%
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Comparison of time during NIV with a oxygen saturation below 90% between S/T mode arm and AVAPS-AE mode arm (determined with an oxymeter)
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Comparison of NIV confort
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Comparison of NIV confort between S/T mode arm and AVAPS-AE mode arm (NIV confort determined by a visual scale: 0: very comfortable to 10:not comfortable at all)
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Comparison of length of stay
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Comparison of length of stay between S/T mode arm and AVAPS-AE mode arm
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Antoine Cuvelier, MD, PhD, UH Rouen

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 4, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data will be avaible by Email request to Dr. Patout Maxime

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Within 2 years of study publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers in the field of acute/chronic respiratory failure.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on AVAPS-AE mode during NIV

Subscribe