The Clinical Outcome of TVM or LSC Mesh Suspension for POP

The Clinical and Urodynamic Effects of Transvaginal or Laparoscopic Mesh Suspension for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse

The investigators aim to assess the surgical outcomes of transvaginal mesh (TVM) and laparoscopic (LSC) mesh suspension. During the study period, all women with main uterine prolapse stage II or greater defined by the POP quantification staging system receiving TVM or LSC mesh suspension were retrospectively recruited. Clinical evaluations before and 6 months after surgery included pelvic examination, urodynamic study, and a personal interview to evaluate urinary and sexual symptoms using questionnaires.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

All women with mainly uterine prolapse stage II or greater as defined by the POP-Q staging system receiving TVM or LSC mesh suspension surgeries at a tertiary referral center in Taiwan were included. The investigators excluded women with a hypertrophic uterus, huge fibroids, history of cervical dysplasia or endometrial pathology, history of postmenopausal bleeding in the past 12 months, and those unwilling to preserve their uterus. Concomitant mid-urethral sling operations were performed in women with current urodynamic stress incontinence unless the participants did not prefer a concomitant surgery. Cervical amputation was performed if the corpus/cervix ratio was less than 1 on the ultrasound. Concomitant anterior and posterior colporrhaphy were performed as needs.

The clinical evaluations consisted of a detailed history before and 6 months after surgery, including urinary analysis, pelvic examination using POP-Q system, urodynamic studies (UDS), transabdominal ultrasound, and personal interview to identify urinary and sexual symptoms with the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS), the short forms of Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6), the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7), the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire, and the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (POPDI-6). Urinary symptoms with the standardized questionnaire taking into account the 2002 ICS definitions. The participants were asked to fill out the visual analog scale (VAS) scores during the postoperative day 1 round. Urodynamic studies, including non-instrumented uroflowmetry, filling and voiding cystometry, and urethral pressure profilometry, were performed according to the recommendations by the International Continence Society with a 6-channel urodynamic monitor (MMS; UD2000, Enschede, Netherlands). Any uninhibited detrusor contraction during filling cystometry was deemed positive for detrusor overactivity (DO).

As a follow-up, postoperative outpatient visits were at 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months and then semiannually beyond one year. Pelvic examination was performed routinely in every visit to clinics. Recurrence was defined as the most dependent portion of POP stage II or greater. The Clavien-Dindo grading was used for the classification of the intraoperative and postoperative complications of Long mesh surgery.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

466

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 807
        • Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 85 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Women with mainly uterine prolapse stage II or greater as defined by the POP-Q staging system

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women with mainly uterine prolapse stage II or greater as defined by the POP-Q staging system

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A hypertrophic uterus, huge fibroids
  • History of cervical dysplasia or endometrial pathology
  • History of postmenopausal bleeding in the past 12 months
  • Unwilling to preserve their uterus

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
TVM group
Women with mainly uterine prolapse stage II or greater as defined by the POP-Q staging system treated with TVM
Transvaginal mesh kit is delivered into the pelvis via vagina route.
LSC mesh suspension group
Women with mainly uterine prolapse stage II or greater as defined by the POP-Q staging system treated with LSC mesh suspension
Long mesh, a synthetic T-shaped mesh (Gynemsh, Ethicon, San Lorenzo, Puerto Rico), is delivered into the pelvic cavity. Bilateral mesh arms are extracted outside trocar wounds bilaterally to stabilize mesh position. The center piece is fixed to the cervix with 5mm ProTack screws (Covidien, New Haven, Connecticut). Fixation is strengthened with Stratafix 2-0 sutures (Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany), followed by Tisseel fibrin sealant (Baxter, Deerfield, Illinois) for better hemostasis among surrounding tissues. An extraperitoneal tunnel is created along the left round ligament until reaching 2cm medial to the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS). One arm of the long mesh is pulled out along the tunnel underneath round ligament and fixed with the fascia of oblique abdominis. The same procedure is repeated for the contralateral side. Bilateral round ligaments and the mesh arms are sutured continuously with Stratafix 2-0.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recurrence
Time Frame: 12 months
The POP-Q stage measurement after the operation
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 31, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 23, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 25, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 28, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • KMUHIRB-E(I)-20190015

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Clinical Trials on TVM

3
Subscribe