Improvement and Application of New Closed Drainage Device (IAAONCDD)

February 16, 2020 updated by: Yongxin Zhou

Improvement and Clinical Application of a New Minimally Invasive Closed Thoracic Drainage System

According to the problems of traditional closed thoracic drainage in clinical work, this study aims to further improve and improve the new closed thoracic drainage system by changing the material of drainage tube, increasing the regulating valve of external fixator and increasing the gas flow monitoring kit for special patients, so as to expand its clinical application scope and formulate its operation. Standardize. At the same time, through a randomized controlled study, the simplicity, effectiveness and safety of the new minimally invasive thoracic closed drainage system developed by the research group were deeply studied.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The traditional closed thoracic drainage method has complex operation and high technical requirements. It has obvious pain during and after operation. Operational complications such as tissue organs, intercostal vessels and nerve injury may occur during the operation. Accidents may also occur after catheterization, including leakage around thoracic drainage tube, thoracic drainage tube prolapse, subcutaneous emphysema and accumulation. Liquid; To solve these problems, we have invented "minimally invasive thoracic closed drainage system" through a number of patent designs, including: thoracic closed drainage tube implantation expansion forceps, double-chamber thoracic drainage device with side balloon, guide wire, puncture needle, various types of dilators, chest tube fixation devices, etc. The system has the characteristics of minimally invasive puncture and implantation of drainage tube, safe, fast operation, no need of suture and fixation, good position of drainage tube after implantation, less pain for patients, and closing incision in the medial part of patients, avoiding leakage and subcutaneous emphysema and hydrops.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

The selection criteria were as follows:

  • age 18-70 years, gender is not limited;
  • subjects clearly understand the purpose of the study, are willing and able to comply with the requirements to complete the study and sign the informed consent;
  • 18 Kg/m2 < BMI < 25 Kg/m2;
  • patients who need thoracic closed drainage for exhaust and drainage because of pneumothorax volume > 30%;
  • subjects did not have serious chest wall deformities.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Patients at high risk of bleeding, including patients with congenital hemophilia, thrombocytopenia (PLT < 50 *109/L), platelet dysfunction (such as idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, disseminated intravascular coagulation, congenital platelet dysfunction);
  • Cardiopulmonary function is poor, which is not suitable for the participants.
  • Patients with other infectious diseases (inflammation, tuberculosis) or empyema in the thoracic cavity;
  • Infection of skin around puncture and drainage;
  • Participated in other clinical trials within 30 days;
  • Other reasons why the researchers think it is inappropriate to participate in the experiment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: New Closed Drainage Device
We further improve the new closed thoracic drainage system by changing the material of drainage tube, adding external fixator control valve and increasing the gas flow monitoring kit for special patients, and apply it in clinical practice.
For the first group, a new closed drainage device was adopted.
EXPERIMENTAL: Traditional Closed Drainage Device
We use traditional closed drainage devices for patients with hemothorax and pneumothorax.
For group 2, conventional closed drainage device was used.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total drainage time
Time Frame: up to 24 weeks
Efficiency of treatment
up to 24 weeks
Pulmonary reexpansion ratio
Time Frame: up to 24 weeks
Pulmonary reexpansion ratio
up to 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VAS pain score during and after operation
Time Frame: up to 24 weeks
0 points means no pain; 1 points - 3 points means mild pain that patients can tolerate; 4 points - 6 points means pain affect sleep, but patients can tolerate;7 points - 10 points: means patients have gradually strong pain, which have affected appetite and sleep.
up to 24 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Operation time of thoracentesis
Time Frame: up to 24 hours
Operation time of thoracentesis
up to 24 hours
Percentage of lung recruitment on day 1 and 3
Time Frame: up to 24 weeks
Percentage of lung recruitment
up to 24 weeks
Operational-related complications
Time Frame: up to 24 weeks
Incidence of loss of thoracic wall nerves, intercostal vessels and thoracic and abdominal organs
up to 24 weeks
Incidence of related accidents after catheterization
Time Frame: up to 24 weeks
Incidence rate of peri-drainage tube exudation, drainage tube falling off, drainage tube obstruction and subcutaneous emphysema
up to 24 weeks
The size of the wound
Time Frame: up to 24 weeks
The size of the wound
up to 24 weeks
infection of the wound
Time Frame: up to 24 weeks
infection of the wound
up to 24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

April 1, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 30, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 29, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 18, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2018-LCYJ-012

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pneumothorax

Clinical Trials on New Closed Drainage Device

3
Subscribe