- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04156633
Clinical Impact of Rapid Identification of Positive Blood Cultures vs. Internal Laboratory Standard
March 1, 2022 updated by: University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
In this before-after study, different new methods for bacterial species identification from positive blood cultures will be compared towards historic controls.
All samples are analyzed within the routine workflow for bacterial species identification and antibiotic resistance profiling.
Patients with positive blood cultures from 2016 to 2018 receiving a conventional identification methods (controls) will be compared to patients from 2018 and 2019 with a new identification method (cases).
The conventional identification method consisted in general of an over-night subculture and subsequent identification of the bacterial pathogen using either biochemical profiling or Matrix-assisted Laser-Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight (MALDI-TOF MS).
The new identification of positive blood cultures methods include (i) either the newly introduced Biofire FilmArray© Blood Culture Identification (BCID) panel or (ii) in a subset of patients whole genome sequencing (WGS) approaches.
Study Overview
Status
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
686
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Basel, Switzerland, 4031
- Division of Clinical Bacteriology & Mycology, University Hospital Basel
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
All patients with positive blood cultures hospitalized at the university hospital Basel between August 2016 and October 2019 are included.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients with positive blood cultures hospitalized between August 2016 and October 2019
- documented refusal of the general consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- outpatients
- patients hospitalized in other hospitals
- patients with known bacteremia diagnosed in another hospital
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
conventional identification methods (controls)
Patients with positive blood cultures from 2016 to 2018 receiving a conventional identification methods (controls).
The conventional identification method consisted in general of an over-night subculture and subsequent identification of the bacterial pathogen using either biochemical profiling or MALDI-TOF MS.
|
Identification of bacteria in positive blood cultures with MALDI-TOF MS from a subculture usually one day after the signal for a positive blood culture appears (from 2016 to 2018)
|
new identification method (cases)Biofire FilmArray© BCID panel
Patients with positive blood cultures from 2018 and 2019 receiving a new identification method (cases).
The new identification method is the Biofire FilmArray© Blood Culture Identification (BCID) panel, a polymerase chain reaction-based method, performed directly from the positive blood culture without the need of subculture to reach single bacterial colonies.
The assays allow to identify a panel of 20 most commonly Gram-positive and -negative bacteria and yeast causing blood stream infections.
It also allows to determine three resistance genes (mecA, vanA/B and KPC).
|
The Biofire FilmArray© BCID Panel is performed directly from the positive blood culture without the need of subculture to reach single bacterial colonies (from 2018 and 2019)
|
new identification method (cases) WGS approaches
Patients with positive blood cultures from 2018 and 2019 receiving a new identification method (cases).
The new identification of positive blood cultures methods in a subset of patients is a whole genome sequencing approach.
This so called shotgun metagenomic approach allows to sequence the whole genome (WGS) of pathogens and thereby potentially detect every potential pathogen and also resistance and virulence gene.
|
shotgun metagenomic approach allows to sequence the whole genome (WGS) of pathogens and thereby potentially detect every potential pathogen and also resistance and virulence gene (from 2018 and 2019)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Time to optimal antibiotic treatment in hours from positive blood cultures (hours)
Time Frame: 24 hours from collection of blood cultures
|
Time from blood draw for blood culture testing to start of optimal antibiotic treatment (hours)
|
24 hours from collection of blood cultures
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Time to effective antibiotic treatment in hours from positive blood cultures (hours)
Time Frame: 24 hours from collection of blood cultures
|
Time from blood draw for blood culture testing to start of effective antibiotic treatment (hours)
|
24 hours from collection of blood cultures
|
all-cause in hospital mortality (number)
Time Frame: from admission to hospital until release from hospital (approximately 30 days)
|
all-cause in hospital mortality (number)
|
from admission to hospital until release from hospital (approximately 30 days)
|
duration on ICU in days
Time Frame: from admission to ICU until release from ICU (approximately 20 days)
|
duration on ICU in days
|
from admission to ICU until release from ICU (approximately 20 days)
|
time to Gram staining and resistance profile from positive blood cultures (hours)
Time Frame: 24 hours from collection of blood cultures
|
time to Gram staining and resistance profile from positive blood cultures (hours)
|
24 hours from collection of blood cultures
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Adrian Egli, PD Dr. med, Division of Clinical Bacteriology & Mycology; University Hospital Basel
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
October 17, 2019
Primary Completion (Actual)
March 1, 2022
Study Completion (Anticipated)
August 1, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 5, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 5, 2019
First Posted (Actual)
November 7, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 2, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 1, 2022
Last Verified
March 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2019-01860; qu19Egli2
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Bloodstream Infections
-
The University of QueenslandShionogiCompletedBloodstream InfectionsTaiwan, Thailand, Singapore, Australia, Malaysia, Turkey
-
The University of QueenslandCompletedBloodstream InfectionsSingapore, Australia
-
Baylor College of MedicineCompletedCatheter-associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI)United States
-
The University of QueenslandAustralasian Society for Infectious Diseases; International Society of Chemotherapy and other collaboratorsTerminatedBloodstream InfectionsAustralia, Singapore, South Africa, Italy, Saudi Arabia, Canada, Lebanon, New Zealand, Turkey
-
Boston Children's HospitalRecruitingLaboratory-confirmed Bloodstream Infection | Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infections | Mucosal Barrier InjuryUnited States
-
Mayo ClinicTerminatedCatheter-related Bloodstream Infection (CRBSI) Nos | Bloodstream Infection Due to Central Venous Catheter | Bloodstream Infection Due to Hickman CatheterUnited States
-
ContraFectCompletedStaphylococcus Aureus Bloodstream Infections (BSI; Bacteremia)United States
-
Istanbul Medeniyet UniversityRecruitingCatheter-Related Infections | Central Venous Catheter Related Bloodstream Infection | Bloodstream Infection Due to Central Venous CatheterTurkey
-
University of ZurichNot yet recruitingCentral Line-associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI) | Catheter-related Bloodstream Infection
-
University Hospital of Canary IslandsCompletedCatheter-related Bloodstream InfectionSpain
Clinical Trials on conventional identification method: biochemical profiling or MALDI-TOF MS
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNYU Langone Health; National Institutes of Health (NIH); Weill Medical College... and other collaboratorsCompletedProstate Cancer | Elevated Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)United States
-
Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose E. GonzalezRecruiting
-
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedBreast CancerUnited States