- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04165148
Low Impact Laparoscopy Concept Versus Conventional Laparoscopy (RANDOLIL)
Randomized Study Comparing the Low Impact Laparoscopy Concept to Conventional Laparoscopy in Terms of Ambulatory Care
Outpatient surgical management has been developing in recent years and High Authority of Health recommendations in French for this type of management is a postoperative pain score of less than 3 on the VAS.
The feasibility and safety of laparoscopy is well established, particularly in the field of gynecology, but this technique often causes postoperative pain. Techniques are being developed to reduce postoperative pain in laparoscopic surgery. Low pressure insufflation (7 to 10 mmHg) compared to standard pressure insufflation (12 to 15 mmHg) significantly reduces postoperative pain. Microcoelioscopy (use of 3 mm trocars instead of 5 to 12 mm trocars in standard laparoscopy), by reducing the size of incisions, also significantly reduces postoperative pain.
The Low Impact Laparoscopy is a minimally invasive technique that combines low pressure insufflation and microcoelioscopy which would have the advantage of reducing postoperative pain. This technique would therefore, by reducing postoperative pain, to improve outpatient management, particularly in cases of hysterectomies for which the outpatient management rate could be increased.
The hypothesis is that using the Low Impact Laparoscopy concept would increase outpatient management rate compared to conventional laparoscopy in gynecological surgeries for hysterectomy.
The study aims to compare the Low Impact Laparoscopy concept with conventional laparoscopy in terms of ambulatory care rates in patients undergoing surgery for hysterectomy.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Géry LAMBLIN, PU,PH
- Phone Number: +33 04 72 35 58 71
- Email: gery.lamblin@chu-lyon.fr
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bron, France, 69677
- Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- women over 18 years
- planned surgery procedure : ambulatory laparoscopic hysterectomy
- effective contraception if women of childbearing age
- patients with free, informed and signed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- disorders leading to an unacceptable risk of postoperative complications sought during the interrogation of the patient (disorders of blood coagulation, disorders of the immune system, progressive diseases ....)
- pregnancy or wish for subsequent pregnancy
- lactating women
- contraindication to laparoscopy
- contraindication to minimally invasive endoscopic techniques
- not eligible for outpatient care
- inability to understand the information given
- a person not affiliated to a social security scheme, or deprived of liberty, or under guardianship.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Low Impact Laparoscopy
Low Impact Laparoscopy is a minimally invasive technique that combines low pressure insufflation (with the Intelligent Flow System (iFS) AirSeal® system) and microcoelioscopy (with specific microtrocards and laparoscopic instruments).
|
Low Impact Laparoscopy is a minimally invasive technique that combines low pressure insufflation (with the iFS AirSeal® system) and microcoelioscopy (with specific microtrocards and laparoscopic instruments).
The patient evaluates her pain using an VAS scale on arrival in the post-interventional surveillance room, then 30 minutes, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours after leaving the operating roo, at the exit of post-interventional surveillance room and at the exit of the hospital. The day after surgery, according to the usual practice, outpatients receive a telephone call from a Gynecologist. The assessment of their pain (with VAS scale) will be collected. During the usual consultation at 1 month, the patient must evaluate her pain by means of an VAS. The patient evaluates her pain using an QDSA questionnaire on arrival in the post-interventional surveillance room, then 30 minutes, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours after leaving the operating roo, at the exit of post-interventional surveillance room and at the exit of the hospital. The day after surgery, according to the usual practice, outpatients receive a telephone call from a Gynecologist. The assessment of their pain (with QDSA questionnaire) will be collected. During the usual consultation at 1 month, the patient must evaluate her pain by means of an QDSA questionnaire.
The patient will fill in the antalgic intake record and the patient booklet for the collection of medical consumptions from her discharge from the hospital and during the month following the surgery.
|
Active Comparator: conventional laparoscopy
|
The patient evaluates her pain using an VAS scale on arrival in the post-interventional surveillance room, then 30 minutes, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours after leaving the operating roo, at the exit of post-interventional surveillance room and at the exit of the hospital. The day after surgery, according to the usual practice, outpatients receive a telephone call from a Gynecologist. The assessment of their pain (with VAS scale) will be collected. During the usual consultation at 1 month, the patient must evaluate her pain by means of an VAS. The patient evaluates her pain using an QDSA questionnaire on arrival in the post-interventional surveillance room, then 30 minutes, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours after leaving the operating roo, at the exit of post-interventional surveillance room and at the exit of the hospital. The day after surgery, according to the usual practice, outpatients receive a telephone call from a Gynecologist. The assessment of their pain (with QDSA questionnaire) will be collected. During the usual consultation at 1 month, the patient must evaluate her pain by means of an QDSA questionnaire.
The patient will fill in the antalgic intake record and the patient booklet for the collection of medical consumptions from her discharge from the hospital and during the month following the surgery.
conventional laparoscopy
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
success rate of ambulatory care
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery
|
rate of patients actually managed on an outpatient setting (discharged from hospital the same day of the intervention) and who presented no complication or rehospitalization in the month following the intervention
|
1 month after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
pain score (Visual analogic scale (VAS) for pain)
Time Frame: arrival in the post-interventional surveillance room
|
Visual analogic scale (VAS) is used to evaluate from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain)
|
arrival in the post-interventional surveillance room
|
pain score (VAS)
Time Frame: 30 minutes after exit of operating room
|
Visual analogic scale (VAS) is used to evaluate from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain)
|
30 minutes after exit of operating room
|
pain score (VAS)
Time Frame: 2 hours after exit of operating room
|
Visual analogic scale (VAS) is used to evaluate from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain)
|
2 hours after exit of operating room
|
pain score (VAS)
Time Frame: 4 hours after exit of operating room
|
Visual analogic scale (VAS) is used to evaluate from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain)
|
4 hours after exit of operating room
|
pain score (VAS)
Time Frame: 6 hours after exit of operating room
|
Visual analogic scale (VAS) is used to evaluate from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain)
|
6 hours after exit of operating room
|
pain score (VAS)
Time Frame: at the exit of a post-interventional surveillance room, an average of 2 hours after arrival
|
Visual analogic scale (VAS) is used to evaluate from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain)
|
at the exit of a post-interventional surveillance room, an average of 2 hours after arrival
|
pain score (VAS)
Time Frame: on leaving the hospital, an average of 8 hours after surgery
|
Visual analogic scale (VAS) is used to evaluate from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain)
|
on leaving the hospital, an average of 8 hours after surgery
|
pain score (VAS)
Time Frame: the day after surgery
|
Visual analogic scale (VAS) is used to evaluate from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain)
|
the day after surgery
|
pain score (VAS)
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery
|
Visual analogic scale (VAS) is used to evaluate from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain)
|
1 month after surgery
|
pain score (Saint-Antoine Pain Questionnaire (QDSA questionnaire))
Time Frame: 6 hours after exit of operating room
|
Pain score assessed by QDSA short questionnaire (Saint-Antoine Pain Questionnaire) : list of 16 qualifiers to describe pain, score ranging from 0 to 64.
|
6 hours after exit of operating room
|
pain score (Saint-Antoine Pain Questionnaire (QDSA))
Time Frame: the day after surgery
|
Pain score assessed by QDSA short questionnaire (Saint-Antoine Pain Questionnaire) : list of 16 qualifiers to describe pain, score ranging from 0 to 64
|
the day after surgery
|
dose of morphine
Time Frame: at the exit of a post-interventional surveillance room, an average of 2 hours after arrival
|
total dose of morphine (miligramme (mg)) administered in the post-interventional surveillance room
|
at the exit of a post-interventional surveillance room, an average of 2 hours after arrival
|
number of patients who needed an analgesic
Time Frame: at the exit of a post-interventional surveillance room, an average of 2 hours after arrival
|
number of patients who needed an analgesic supplement in post-interventional monitoring room
|
at the exit of a post-interventional surveillance room, an average of 2 hours after arrival
|
number of patients who needed an analgesic
Time Frame: on leaving the hospital, an average of 8 hours after surgery
|
number of patients who needed an analgesic supplement in post-interventional monitoring room
|
on leaving the hospital, an average of 8 hours after surgery
|
number of patients who needed an analgesic
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery
|
number of patients who needed an analgesic supplement in post-interventional monitoring room
|
1 month after surgery
|
total administered dose
Time Frame: at the exit of a post-interventional surveillance room, an average of 2 hours after arrival
|
total administered dose of analgesic supplement (mg) in post-interventional monitoring room
|
at the exit of a post-interventional surveillance room, an average of 2 hours after arrival
|
total administered dose
Time Frame: on leaving the hospital, an average of 8 hours after surgery
|
total administered dose of analgesic supplement (mg) in post-interventional monitoring room
|
on leaving the hospital, an average of 8 hours after surgery
|
total administered dose
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery
|
total administered dose of analgesic supplement (mg) in post-interventional monitoring room
|
1 month after surgery
|
duration of analgesic treatment
Time Frame: on leaving the hospital
|
duration of analgesic treatment (days) during the hospital stay
|
on leaving the hospital
|
duration of analgesic treatment
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery
|
duration of analgesic treatment (days) during the hospital stay
|
1 month after surgery
|
operating time
Time Frame: at the exit of the operating room, an average of 30 minutes after surgery
|
operative time (between incision and closure) in minutes
|
at the exit of the operating room, an average of 30 minutes after surgery
|
number of per and postoperative complications
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery
|
number of per and postoperative complications
|
1 month after surgery
|
types of per and postoperative complications
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery
|
description of per and postoperative complications
|
1 month after surgery
|
hours total of stay in the post-intervention monitoring room
Time Frame: at the exit of a post-interventional surveillance room
|
length of stay in the post-interventional surveillance room in hours
|
at the exit of a post-interventional surveillance room
|
number of days of hospital stay
Time Frame: on leaving the hospital
|
length of hospital stay (if non ambulatory care) in number of days
|
on leaving the hospital
|
number of days of work stoppage
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery
|
duration of work stoppage of the patient in number of days
|
1 month after surgery
|
patient management costs
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery
|
Patient management costs according to the two surgical strategies
|
1 month after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 69HCL19_0335
- 2019-A01863-54 (Other Identifier: ID-RCB)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Ambulatory Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
-
ZSX Medical LLCTerminatedLaparoscopic HysterectomyUnited States
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillCompletedLaparoscopic HysterectomyUnited States
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillCompletedLaparoscopic Hysterectomy and/or Laparoscopic SacrocolpopexyUnited States
-
Balikesir UniversityCompleted
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompleted
-
Samyang Biopharmaceuticals CorporationRecruitingLaparoscopic HysterectomyKorea, Republic of
-
ZSX Medical LLCEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...RecruitingLaparoscopic HysterectomyUnited States
-
Danbury HospitalEthicon, Inc.Completed
-
Mansoura UniversityRecruitingTotal Laparoscopic HysterectomyEgypt
-
Ilsan Cha hospitalRecruitingTotal Laparoscopic HysterectomyKorea, Republic of
Clinical Trials on Low Impact Laparoscopy
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceCompletedAppendicitis | AppendectomyFrance
-
Institut Paoli-CalmettesCompleted
-
Fundación Santa Fe de BogotaInstituto Colombiano para el Desarrollo de la Ciencia y la Tecnología (COLCIENCIAS)SuspendedBone Loss, Age-Related,
-
University of Southern CaliforniaRecruiting
-
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthTime-sharing Experiments for the Social SciencesCompletedFood Selection | AttitudeUnited States
-
Seda Yuksel SimsekUnknown
-
University of ValenciaCompleted
-
Vanderbilt UniversityTerminatedChronic Kidney DiseaseUnited States
-
University of CopenhagenTerminatedMajor DepressionDenmark
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityAetna, Inc.; Pet PartnersWithdrawnThe Effect of a Therapy Dog Activity on Employees' Stress, Mood, and Job Satisfaction and CommitmentStress | Mood | Job SatisfactionUnited States