Walking in the HIBBOT: is Gait Improved?

October 5, 2021 updated by: Ann Hallemans, Universiteit Antwerpen

The Effect of a Novel Gait Trainer, the Hibbot, on the Development of Crouch Gait in Children With Cerebral Palsy

The aim of the study is to assess the impact of the innovative walking aid HIBBOT on the functions, activity and participation of young children with Cerebral Palsy, in comparison with conventional walking aids.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Antwerp, Belgium, 2160
        • University of Antwerp

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 6 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At risk of or diagnosed with cerebral palsy, based on MRI (uCP 86 - 89 % sensitivity) or HINE (uCP 98% ) or standard motor assessment
  • age 18 months - 6 years
  • GMFCS level II - IV =with potential (=able to stand and walk when supported by a therapist at the level of the pelvis and lower trunk)
  • Sufficient cooperation to complete the tests.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hip dysplasia
  • Fixed contractures in the lower limb
  • Botox infiltration < 6 months prior to inclusion
  • Surgery < 12 months prior to inclusion
  • Insufficient understanding of the interventon and tests (based on mental level assessment)
  • Refractary epilepsia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard Care
Standard care involves the standard physiotherapy the child would get during clinical care.
Experimental: Hibbot
Hibbot is an assistive mechanical device, lightweight and portable. The mechanism of the Hibbot manages to control all degrees of freedom (3x rotation and 3x translation) at the level of the pelvis and lower trunk. The goal is to maximize a child's own muscle activity and postural control while giving as minimal support as needed.
Standard care involves the standard physiotherapy the child would get during clinical care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Lower limb kinematics during walking in degrees
Time Frame: baseline (at intake, T0) and after the intervention period (3 months, T1)
The gait pattern is assessed by instrumented 3D gait analysis. Joint rotation angles of the major joints of the lower limbs will be described during walking.
baseline (at intake, T0) and after the intervention period (3 months, T1)
Change in Muscle activation patterns during gait in microvolts
Time Frame: baseline (at intake, T0) and after the intervention period (3 months, T1)
Surface electromyography signals will be recorded during gait
baseline (at intake, T0) and after the intervention period (3 months, T1)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lower limb kinematics during walking in degrees
Time Frame: at follow up (12 months after intake, T2)
The gait pattern is assessed by instrumented 3D gait analysis. Joint rotation angles of the major joints of the lower limbs will be described during walking.
at follow up (12 months after intake, T2)
Muscle activation patterns during gait in microvolts
Time Frame: at follow up (12 months after intake, T2)
Surface electromyography signals will be recorded during gait
at follow up (12 months after intake, T2)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 14, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 18/44/509

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

At finalisation of the study and for a period of 5 years

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy

Subscribe