Nonablative Fractional Diode Laser for Treatment of Pigmented Lesions

July 13, 2023 updated by: Candela Corporation

Clinical Evaluation of a Nonablative Fractional 1940 nm Diode Laser for Treatment of Pigmented Lesions

This study is being conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a fractional diode laser for treatment of pigmented lesions such as, but not limited to lentigos (age spots), solar lentigos (sunspots), and ephelides (freckles).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Prospective, open-label, clinical trial to study the effects of the nonablative, fractional diode laser for treatment of pigmented lesions.

Up to 60 eligible participants will be enrolled at up to five (5) sites. Participants will receive up to three (3) treatments in the following treatment areas: face, hands, arms, back, chest, or legs. Participants will complete follow-up visits for clinical evaluation and photography at 1 and 3 months after the final study treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33173
        • Miami Dermatology and Laser Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or Female
  2. Age 21 to 70
  3. Fitzpatrick Skin Type I to VI
  4. Willingness to have test spots and up to three (3) treatments for pigmented lesions on or off the face which are rated at baseline as moderate or higher per Investigator or study staff
  5. Provide signed informed consent to participate in the study
  6. Adhere to study treatment and follow-up schedules
  7. Willing to have hair removed from the intended treatment area prior to treatment and/or photography
  8. Avoid sun exposure to all treated areas and use of sunscreen with sun protection factor (SPF) 30 or greater throughout the duration of the study
  9. Adhere to post-treatment care instructions
  10. Allow photography of treated areas and to release their use for scientific and/or promotional purposes

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant, planning to become pregnant, or breast feeding during the study
  2. Allergy to lidocaine or similar medications
  3. Excessively tanned skin in the intended treatment area
  4. Open wound or infection in the intended treatment area
  5. Tattoo(s) or permanent make-up in the intended treatment area
  6. Skin condition in the intended treatment area that could interfere with treatment or evaluation of safety or efficacy
  7. Presence or history of melasma
  8. Presence or history of skin cancer within the treatment area
  9. History of keloid or hypertrophic scar formation
  10. History of herpes simplex virus (HSV) or similar condition in the intended treatment area unless treated with prophylactic medication
  11. Diagnosed coagulation disorder
  12. Immunosuppression disorder
  13. Presence of any medical condition that in the opinion of the Investigator could impair healing or outcome as a result of treatment
  14. Use of systemic retinoid therapy (e.g. Accutane) during the past six (6) months
  15. Use of topical retinoid therapy in the intended treatment area during the past two (2) weeks
  16. Use of oral corticosteroid therapy during the past four (4) weeks
  17. Prior treatment, such as surgery, light, laser or radiofrequency (RF) procedures in the intended treatment area during the past three (3) months
  18. Prior injectable dermal fillers (e.g. collagen, hyaluronic acid) in the intended treatment area within the past 12 months
  19. Prior injectable toxins (e.g. Botox) in the intended treatment area within the past three (3) months
  20. Subjects who in the opinion of the Investigator are unwilling or unable to adhere to the study requirements, or who are otherwise not a good candidate for the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Single Group
Single Arm: All subjects will undergo treatment of pigmented lesions with a 1940 nm diode laser
A fractional 1940 nm solid-state diode laser will deliver linear arrays of microbeams to create nonablative microscopic treatment zones (MTZs) in the skin, in order to treat pigmented skin lesions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pigmented Lesion Improvement by Blinded Evaluation
Time Frame: 1 month follow-up post treatment series, where treatment could last up to 10 weeks after baseline
The primary efficacy endpoint was defined as improvement in the clearance of pigmented lesions, as assessed by three (3) blinded evaluators comparing photographs taken at Baseline/Pre-treatment and at the 1-month follow-up (post final treatment)
1 month follow-up post treatment series, where treatment could last up to 10 weeks after baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pigmentation Improvement at the 3-month Follow-up, by Blinded Evaluation
Time Frame: 3-months post final treatment, where treatment series could last up to 10 weeks after baseline
The secondary endpoint was pigmentation improvement at the 3-month follow-up, as assessed by three (3) blinded evaluators comparing photographs taken at Baseline/Pre-treatment and at the 3-month follow-up (post final treatment). The treated area was considered a "success" if at least two of the three reviewers correctly identified the post-treatment photograph (i.e. left or right side).
3-months post final treatment, where treatment series could last up to 10 weeks after baseline
Blinded Assessment of Textural Improvement Using a 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)
Time Frame: 1 month follow-up post treatment series, where treatment could last up to 10 weeks after baseline
For each reviewer assessment: If the post-treatment photograph was identified correctly, the reviewer's assessment on the textural scale was coded as follows: -1=worse, 0=no change; 1=improved; 2=much improved; and 3=very much improved. If not identified correctly, the scale was reversed (-1=improved, 0=no change, 1=worsened, 2=much worsened and 3=very much worsened). Results were based on the majority rule of the assessments by the three blinded reviewers; in other words, the mode of the three blinded reviewers' scores was used as the treated area clearance results, while the median was used if three different scores were reported.
1 month follow-up post treatment series, where treatment could last up to 10 weeks after baseline
Subject Assessment of Improvement Using a 5-point Global, Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)
Time Frame: 1 month follow-up post treatment series, where treatment could last up to 10 weeks after baseline
Subject assessments of treatment outcome were completed at the 1-month follow-up using the Global Assessment Improvement Scale (GAIS). The scale was coded as follows: -1=worse, 0=no change; 1=improved; 2=much improved; and 3=very much improved
1 month follow-up post treatment series, where treatment could last up to 10 weeks after baseline
Subject Satisfaction With Treatment Results
Time Frame: 1 month follow-up post treatment series, where treatment could last up to 10 weeks after baseline
Subject satisfaction with treatment results completed at the 1-month follow-up using a 5 point scale coded as follows: -1=not satisfied, 0=little satisfied; 1=somewhat satisfied; 2=satisfied; and 3=very satisfied
1 month follow-up post treatment series, where treatment could last up to 10 weeks after baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jill S Waibel, M.D, Miami Dermatology and Laser Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 9, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 26, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

April 26, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 17, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FRX19005

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pigmented Skin Lesion

Clinical Trials on FRAX 1940 nm laser

Subscribe