Comedone Extraction and Oral Doxycycline In The First Line Treatment of Moderate Acne Vulgaris

December 19, 2019 updated by: Dr.dr.Irma Bernadette, SpKK (K), Indonesia University

Effectiveness of Comedone Extraction and Oral Doxycycline In The First Line Treatment of Moderate Acne Vulgaris: Study on HIF-1 Alpha Expression

The objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of comedone extraction compared to oral antibiotics as the main therapy of moderate acne vulgaris (MAV); and to determine the expression of HIF-1 alpha by examining the immunohistochemistry and ELISA as a sign of hypoxia/anoxia in MAV lesion. This was a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial that was performed in 2015 at three different dermatology clinics in Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital Jakarta, Gatot Soebroto Army Hospital Jakarta, and PT. Mattel Indonesia, Cikarang. One hundred and twenty eight subjects with moderate acne vulgaris were recruited and randomized to receive either oral doxycycline or comedone extraction for six weeks. Subjects who had acne lesion and the back area were offered skin lesion biopsy to evaluate immunohistochemistry and ELISA before administration of medication. The main outcome was total reduction of inflammatory and non inflammatory lesions, evaluated every two weeks.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Acne vulgaris (AV) is a polymorphic disease, characterized by inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions. Systemic antibiotics play a role as the first line therapy of moderate acne vulgaris treatment. Since bacterial resistance tends to increase, alternative therapy for moderate acne vulgaris is needed.

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of comedone extraction compared to oral antibiotics as the main therapy of moderate acne vulgaris; and to etermine the expression of HIF-1 alpha by examining the immunohistochemistry and ELISA as a sign of hypoxia/anoxia in MAV lesion.

This was a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial that was performed in 2015 at three different dermatology clinics in Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital Jakarta, Gatot Soebroto Army Hospital Jakarta, and PT. Mattel Indonesia, Cikarang.

One hundred and twenty eight subjects, aged between 15 and 50 years, with moderate acne vulgaris were recruited and randomized to receive either oral doxycycline (100 mg) or comedone extraction for six weeks. Subjects who had acne lesion and the back area were offered skin lesion biopsy to evaluate immunohistochemistry and ELISA before administration of medication.

At each follow-up visit, subjects were asked to grade the overall response and questioned regarding adverse events. The objective or main outcome was total reduction of inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

140

Phase

  • Phase 1

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 48 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with moderate acne vulgaris based on clinical manifestation of face (20-100 comedones, 15-50 inflammatory lesions, and/or 30-125 total lesions)
  • Age range of 15 to 50 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of oral antibiotics consumption within 2 weeks preceding this study
  • Usage of topical retinoid in less than previous 2 weeks
  • History of systemic retinoid consumption within 3 months preceding this study
  • Pregnant of breastfeeding women
  • Consuming oral contraception during examination
  • Drug allergy or skin manifestation due to side effect of moderate acne vulgaris first line therapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Doxycycline Group
Subjects were randomized to receive Doxycycline capsules. The capsules were taken once daily for 6 weeks and evaluated every 2 weeks.
Doxycycline capsule 100 mg/day, tretinoin cream 0.05% on face every night, benzoyl peroxide gel 2.5% on face in the morning and afternoon.
Active Comparator: Comedone Extraction Group
Subjects were randomized to receive comedone extraction. Comedone extraction were done three times, and evaluated every 2 weeks.
Comedone extraction, tretinoin cream 0.05% on face every night, benzoyl peroxide gel 2.5% on face in the morning and afternoon.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline Inflammatory Lesions at 2 weeks
Time Frame: 2 weeks

Numeric data of total reduction (improvement) of inflammatory lesions

(Baseline inflammatory lesion count) - (Week 2 inflammatory lesion count)

__________________________________________________________ x 100% Baseline inflammatory lesion count

2 weeks
Change from Baseline Inflammatory Lesions at 4 weeks
Time Frame: 4 weeks

Numeric data of total reduction (improvement) of inflammatory lesions

(Baseline inflammatory lesion count) - (Week 4 inflammatory lesion count)

__________________________________________________________ x 100% Baseline inflammatory lesion count

4 weeks
Change from Baseline Inflammatory Lesions at 6 weeks
Time Frame: 6 weeks

Numeric data of total reduction (improvement) of inflammatory lesions

(Baseline inflammatory lesion count) - (Week 6 inflammatory lesion count)

__________________________________________________________ x 100% Baseline inflammatory lesion count

6 weeks
Change from Baseline Non-Inflammatory Lesions at 2 weeks
Time Frame: 2 weeks

Numeric data of total reduction (improvement) of non-inflammatory lesions

(Baseline non-inflammatory lesion count) - (Week 2 non-inflammatory lesion count)

__________________________________________________________ x 100% Baseline non-inflammatory lesion count

2 weeks
Change from Baseline Non-Inflammatory Lesions at 4 weeks
Time Frame: 4 weeks

Numeric data of total reduction (improvement) of non-inflammatory lesions

(Baseline non-inflammatory lesion count) - (Week 4 non-inflammatory lesion count)

__________________________________________________________ x 100% Baseline non-inflammatory lesion count

4 weeks
Change from Baseline Non-Inflammatory Lesions at 6 weeks
Time Frame: 6 weeks

Numeric data of total reduction (improvement) of non-inflammatory lesions

(Baseline non-inflammatory lesion count) - (Week 6 non-inflammatory lesion count)

__________________________________________________________ x 100% Baseline non-inflammatory lesion count

6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjective Improvement at 2 weeks
Time Frame: 2 weeks

Improvement of clinical manifestation based on subjective complaints. Subjects were asked to grade overall response using rating scale (0-4), with higher score means a better outcome (0) no or minimal improvement

  1. mild improvement
  2. moderate improvement
  3. robust improvement
  4. very good improvement
2 weeks
Subjective Improvement at 4 weeks
Time Frame: 4 weeks

Improvement of clinical manifestation based on subjective complaints. Subjects were asked to grade overall response using rating scale (0-4), with higher score means a better outcome (0) no or minimal improvement

  1. mild improvement
  2. moderate improvement
  3. robust improvement
  4. very good improvement
4 weeks
Subjective Improvement at 6 weeks
Time Frame: 6 weeks

Improvement of clinical manifestation based on subjective complaints. Subjects were asked to grade overall response using rating scale (0-4), with higher score means a better outcome (0) no or minimal improvement

  1. mild improvement
  2. moderate improvement
  3. robust improvement
  4. very good improvement
6 weeks
Number of Participants with Side Effects at 2 weeks
Time Frame: 2 weeks
  • Mild side effects if it did not need further management and research medication could be continued.
  • Moderate side effects if clinical manifestations were robust, itchy, pain, erythematous, yet did not need further management and temporary.
  • Severe side effects if it interfered daily activity, such as burn and pain sensastion, erythematous skin, edema, skin exfoliation, that needed further management.
2 weeks
Number of Participants with Side Effects at 4 weeks
Time Frame: 4 weeks
  • Mild side effects if it did not need further management and research medication could be continued.
  • Moderate side effects if clinical manifestations were robust, itchy, pain, erythematous, yet did not need further management and temporary.
  • Severe side effects if it interfered daily activity, such as burn and pain sensastion, erythematous skin, edema, skin exfoliation, that needed further management.
4 weeks
Number of Participants with Side Effects at 6 weeks
Time Frame: 6 weeks
  • Mild side effects if it did not need further management and research medication could be continued.
  • Moderate side effects if clinical manifestations were robust, itchy, pain, erythematous, yet did not need further management and temporary.
  • Severe side effects if it interfered daily activity, such as burn and pain sensastion, erythematous skin, edema, skin exfoliation, that needed further management.
6 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Expression of Antibody HIF-1 Alpha with Immunohistochemistry Examination
Time Frame: Baseline
Analysis of HIF-1 Alpha expression on keratinocyte cell of pilosebaceous ducts (samples from skin lesion biopsy) was examined with immunohistochemistry using antibody HIF-1 alpha which was visualized with microscope and photographed to achieve qualitative data.
Baseline
Expression of Antibody HIF-1 Alpha with ELISA Examination
Time Frame: Baseline
The measurement of HIF-1 Alpha protein concentration in the sebaceous follicle ducts was conducted through ELISA examination with Cusabio Human Hypoxia-inducible factor
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Irma B Sitohang, MD, PhD, Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

October 14, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 20, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 20, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acne Vulgaris

Clinical Trials on Doxycycline Capsule

3
Subscribe