Ambulation for Latency During Expectant Management of PPROM (AMBLE)

August 24, 2023 updated by: Beth Leong Pineles, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Ambulation for Latency During Expectant Management of PPROM: A Randomized Controlled Trial (AMBLE)

Ambulation in pregnancy has been proposed to decrease stress and anxiety, increasing preterm birth. Whether ambulation is causally related to latency is unknown. The FitBit will be used for tracking the number of steps taken daily by each participant, and for encouraging the intervention group to walk. The FitBit is the most widely used physical activity tracker in medical research, and its use has been validated for research use in pregnant women. The purpose of the study is to evaluate whether ambulation in patients with preterm premature rupture of the membranes (PPROM) prolongs latency.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Universtiy of Texas Health Science Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 55 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • Pregnant women aged 12-55
  • Gestational age 23 0/7 to 35 0/7 weeks
  • PPROM confirmed by clinical diagnosis which includes sterile speculum examination with pooling, ferning, and nitrazine tests, or the Amnisure ROM Test
  • Planned inpatient expectant management with delivery goal >=7 days from enrollment
  • Ability to provide informed consent in English or Spanish

Exclusion Criteria

  • Imminent delivery
  • Transverse or footling breech presentation (if multiple gestation, presenting fetus)
  • Unstable lie (if multiple gestation, presenting fetus)
  • Funic presentation (if multiple gestation, presenting fetus)
  • Active vaginal bleeding
  • Regular, painful contractions (>=3 in 10 minutes for 30 minutes or more) consistent with labor
  • Clinical contraindication to ambulation as determined by the managing physician
  • Physician declines to have the patient approached for participation
  • Lethal fetal anomalies

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ambulation Group
Participants in the ambulation arm will be allowed ad lib activity and instructed that they should walk at least once per day out of their room with a goal of 2,000 steps per day. The Fitbit InspireTM devices will be set to this goal and notifications will be given on the device for the participants meeting their goals. Upon enrollment, they will be given a pamphlet with instructions to ambulate out of the room at least once per day with a goal of 2,000 steps daily and their Fitbits will be pre-programmed with this goal. Study staff will also remind participants to ambulate via email, text or in-person if they are not meeting their goal of 2,000 steps per day.
Participants in the ambulation arm will be allowed ad lib activity and instructed that they should walk at least once per day out of their room with a goal of 2,000 steps per day. The Fitbit Inspire devices will be set to this goal and notifications will be given on the device for the participants meeting their goals
Active Comparator: Routine Care
Participants in the routine care arm will be allowed ad lib activity but no encouragement to walk will be given. They will not have any goals set on their Fitbits. Upon enrollment, they will be given pamphlets with no instruction on whether or not to ambulate and their Fitbits will be pre-programmed to have no goal.
No encouragement to ambulate will be provided to subjects. Their movement will be recorded

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Latency (measured in days) from from randomization to delivery
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maternal Infectious morbidity
Time Frame: at delivery
Chorioamnionitis, endometritis
at delivery
# of subjects with Placental abruption
Time Frame: at delivery
at delivery
# of subjects with Cesarean delivery (and emergent cesarean delivery)
Time Frame: at delivery
at delivery
# of subjects with Umbilical cord prolapse
Time Frame: at delivery
at delivery
# of subjects with Maternal venous thromboembolism
Time Frame: at delivery
at delivery
Maternal Readmission
Time Frame: within 6 weeks of delivery- 6 weeks
within 6 weeks of delivery- 6 weeks
Time to delivery (time-to-event outcome)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Delivered at >7 days post randomization
Time Frame: at delivery
at delivery
Maternal antepartum hospitalization length of stay
Time Frame: from admission to delivery
from admission to delivery
Measurement of Stress outcomes utilizing Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
Time Frame: 7 days
comparison between 2 groups- as measured by validated Stress survey. Scaled 0-4 corresponding response of Never to very often respectively. Change from baseline to day 7
7 days
Measurement of Anxiety outcomes utilizing State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Time Frame: 7 days
comparison between 2 groups-as measured by validated anxiety survey. Scaled 1-4 corresponding response of Not at all to very much so. Change from baseline to day 7
7 days
Measurement of Depression outcomes utilizing Edinburgh Depression Scale (EDS)
Time Frame: 7 days
comparison between 2 groups-as measured by validated depression scale. Maximum score: 30 Possible Depression: 10 or greater Always look at item 10 (suicidal thoughts) Change from baseline to day 7
7 days
Measurement of Patient Satisfaction by validated satisfaction survey between 2 groups
Time Frame: at delivery
comparison between 2 groups-as measured by validated survey from the last questionnaire answered prior to delivery
at delivery
Fetal or neonatal death
Time Frame: at discharge
at discharge
Apgar score < 5 at 5 minutes of life
Time Frame: at delivery
at delivery
Umbilical arterial pH < 7.00
Time Frame: at delivery
at delivery
# of neonates with Small for gestational age
Time Frame: at delivery
defined as < 5th percentile weight for gestational age, assessed specifically by sex and race of the infant based on United States birth certificate data
at delivery
# of neonates with Neonatal intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) grades III or IV
Time Frame: at discharge
as determined by cranial ultrasounds performed as part of routine clinical care and classified based on the Papule classification system
at discharge
# of neonates with Neonatal periventricular leukomalacia (PVL)
Time Frame: at discharge
at discharge
# of neonates with Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC)
Time Frame: at discharge
at discharge
# of neonates with Neonatal retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).
Time Frame: at discharge
This diagnosis will be reached when an ophthalmologic examination of the retina has been performed and ROP is diagnosed at Stage I (demarcation line in the retina) or greater.
at discharge
# of neonates with Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD)
Time Frame: at discharge
defined as oxygen requirement at 28 days of life or at 36 weeks postmenstrual age for infants born before 32 weeks.
at discharge
Gestational age at delivery < 28 weeks
Time Frame: at delivery
at delivery
Gestational age at delivery < 34 weeks
Time Frame: at delivery
at delivery
Neonatal length of hospital stay, based on admission to NICU or intermediate care unit
Time Frame: at discharge
at discharge
Composite adverse maternal outcome (CMAO)
Time Frame: at discharge
at discharge
Composite adverse fetal/neonatal outcome
Time Frame: at discharge
at discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 10, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 22, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pregnancy Complications

Clinical Trials on Ambulation Group

Subscribe