Multimarker Approach for Acute Dyspnea in Elderly Patients Admitted in the Emergency Department (READ-MA)

November 14, 2024 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon

Elderly people constitute the largest proportion of emergency department (ED) patients, representing 12% of all ED admissions. The need for diagnostic tests or therapeutic interventions is much greater in this patient population. Cardiovascular diseases and symptoms represent 12% of the causes for ED admission, and patients suffering from cardiovascular disease are those whose ED visit lasts longest.

The diagnostic approach in the ED in elderly patients admitted for acute dypsnoea is complex, and early identification of acute left-sided heart failure (ALSHF) is vital as it has an impact on prognosis. The clinical signs are difficult to interpret, and are non-specific, particularly at the acute phase and in elderly or obese patients. Indeed, some authors have reported up to 50% of diagnostic errors in elderly patients.

Measure of the blood concentration of a natriuretic peptide allows a quick diagnosis. However, peptides alone suffer from several limitations, particularly in situations that are often encountered in elderly patients, such as sepsis, renal failure, acute coronary syndrome, pulmonary embolism, chronic respiratory failure, atrial fibrillation and high body mass index. Diagnostic performance deteriorates with increasing age, and there is a significant increase in this grey-zone in patients aged ≥75 years. In critical situations in elderly patients, assessment of natriuretic peptides serve mainly to rule out a diagnosis of left heart failure.

Some authors have studied other biomarkers showing their performance in the diagnosis of ALSHF. These are biomarkers involved in remodeling and myocardial fibrosis (ST2, Galectin-3) or involved in myocardial injury (High-sensitivity Troponin-I).

Therefore, a combined "multimarker" approach could improve the diagnostic performance of ALSHF.

READ (NCT02531542) is a diagnostic study including patients over the age of 75 admitted to acute dyspnea in the ED, to demonstrate the superiority of an ultrasound protocol (the READ protocol) on NT-proBNP in the ALSHF diagnosis.

The hypothesis is that the diagnostic accuracy of a multimarker diagnostic approach, namely the READ-MA method, combining NT-proBNP, High-sensitivity Troponin-I, ST2 and Galectin-3 would be superior to that of NT-proBNP assessment for the diagnosis of ALSHF in elderly patients (≥75 years) admitted to the ED.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

238

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Franche-Comté
      • Besançon, Franche-Comté, France, 25000
        • CENTRE HOSPITALIER UNIVERSITAIRE de BESANCON

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

75 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients aged ≥75 years admitted to the ED for acute dyspnea

Description

Inclusion Criteria :

  • Admission to the Emergency Department with age ≥ 75 years
  • AND criteria of acute dyspnea :

Breathe rate ≥ 25 cycles/minute or PaO2 ≤ 70 mmHg or SpO2 ≤ 92% in room air or PacO2 ≥ 45 mmHg and pH ≤ 7.35

- AND Electrocardiogram in sinus rhythm or in atrial fibrillation at admission

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Acute Heart Failure
The presence or absence of ALSHF (gold standard used in the READ study) : diagnosis by 2 experts (cardiologist and emergency physician) based on data collected in the ED and during hospitalization (clinical examination, history, usual treatment, haemodynamic parameters, ECG, chest X-ray, emergency treatment, clinical and paraclinical results during hospitalization), biological assays (except NT-proBNP) and echocardiography (Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction, segmental kinetic, potential valvulopathy, transmitral flow, tissue doppler E' velocity) performed by a cardiologist within 24 hours of admission.
No Acute Heart Failure
The presence or absence of ALSHF (gold standard used in the READ study) : diagnosis by 2 experts (cardiologist and emergency physician) based on data collected in the ED and during hospitalization (clinical examination, history, usual treatment, haemodynamic parameters, ECG, chest X-ray, emergency treatment, clinical and paraclinical results during hospitalization), biological assays (except NT-proBNP) and echocardiography (Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction, segmental kinetic, potential valvulopathy, transmitral flow, tissue doppler E' velocity) performed by a cardiologist within 24 hours of admission.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To assess the diagnostic performance of the multimarker approach (combining NT-proBNP, High-sensitivity Troponin-I, ST2 and Galectin-3) for the diagnosis of ALSHF in patients aged ≥75 years admitted to the ED for acute dyspnea
Time Frame: 1 day
  1. The presence or absence of ALSHF (gold standard used in the READ study) : diagnosis by 2 experts (cardiologist and emergency physician) based on data collected in the ED and during hospitalization, biological assays (except NT-proBNP) and echocardiography performed by a cardiologist.
  2. The positivity of the evaluated test (multi-marker approach) :

    • For NT-proBNP, the threshold for positivity is higher than 1800 pg/mL. There is no consensus for High-Sensitivity Troponin-I, ST2 and Galectin-3. Firstly, the optimal threshold of each of these 3 biomarkers will be assessed by ROC curve, then the best combination between these 4 biomarkers will be tested to obtain an optimal discrimination (sensitivity, specificity positive and negative predictive values), positive and negative likelihood ratios) using various methods.
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To demonstrate the superiority of the multimarker approach (NT-proBNP, High-sensitivity Troponin-I, ST2 and Galectin-3) over NT-proBNP alone for the diagnosis of ALSHF in patients aged ≥75 years admitted to the ED for acute dyspnea
Time Frame: 1 day

To demonstrate the superiority of this combined multi-marker approach combining NT-proBNP, Troponin-I ultrasensitive, ST-2 and Galectin-3 on NT-proBNP alone in the diagnosis of ALSHF in subjects over 75 years admitted to emergencies for acute dyspnea, will be evaluated :

  • The presence or absence of acute left heart failure (gold standard selected in the context of the READ study) will be determined using the previously defined criteria
  • The evaluated test will be the best multimarker approach previously determined, classified as positive or negative using the previously defined criteria
  • The comparative test (NT-proBNP alone) will be classified positive for a threshold higher than 1800 pg/mL
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Frédéric MAUNY, Prof, MD, PhD, CENTRE HOSPITALIER UNIVERSITAIRE de BESANCON
  • Study Chair: Patrick RAY, Prof, MD, PhD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon
  • Study Chair: Camille CHENEVIER-GOBEAUX, PharmD, PhD, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris
  • Study Chair: Marie-Hélène TOURNOYS, PharmD, Centre Hospitalier de Béthune
  • Study Chair: Noémie NMINEJ, CENTRE HOSPITALIER UNIVERSITAIRE de BESANCON
  • Study Chair: Marc PUYRAVEAU, MSc, CENTRE HOSPITALIER UNIVERSITAIRE de BESANCON
  • Study Chair: Alain-Eric DUBART, MD, CH Bethune

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 21, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 27, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P/2019/466

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on READ-MA Multimarker Approach

Subscribe