Glucocorticoid Therapy for COVID-19 Critically Ill Patients With Severe Acute Respiratory Failure

June 13, 2020 updated by: Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Glucocorticoid Therapy for Critically Ill Patients With Severe Acute Respiratory Infections Caused by COVID-19: a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

In this multi-center, randomized, control study, the investigators will evaluate the efficacy and safety of glucocorticoid in combination with standard care for COVID-19 patents with Severe acute respiratory failure.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

COVID-19 is a novel coronavirus that was initially outbreak in Wuhan, China. Severe acute respiratory infection with COVID-19 causes severe acute respiratory failure with substantial mortality. Currently, the standard care is supportive care, and no treatment is proven to be effective for this condition.

Glucocorticoid therapy is widely used among critically ill patients with other coronavirus infection such as SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) and MERS (Middle East respiratory syndrome). However, whether glucocorticoid improved the outcome of COVID-19 remains unknown. We hypothesized that glucocorticoid would improve the prognosis of patietns with COVID-19.

In this study, critically ill patients with COVID-19 were enrolled and randomized to receive ether standard care or standard care in combination with methylprednisolone therapy. The primary outcome is the difference of Murray lung injury score between two groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 010
        • Medical ICU,Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult
  • PCR confirmed COVID-19 infection
  • Symptoms developed more than 7 days
  • PaO2/FiO2 < 200 mmHg
  • Positive pressure ventilation (non-invasive or invasive) or high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) higher than 45 L/min for less than 48 hours
  • Requiring ICU admission

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy;
  • patients currently taking corticosteroids (cumulative 400 mg prednisone or equivalent);
  • Severe underlying disease, i.e. end stage of malignancy disease or end stage of pulmonary disease;
  • Severe adverse events before ICU admission, i.e. cardiac arrest;
  • Underlying disease requiring corticosteroids;
  • Contraindication for corticosteroids;
  • Recruited in other clinical intervention trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: standard care
Standard care
Experimental: standard care + methylprednisolone therapy
Methylprednisolone 40 mg q12h for 5 days
Methylprednisolone 40 mg q12h for 5 days
Other Names:
  • Steroids

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lower Murray lung injury score
Time Frame: 7 days after randomization
Murray lung injury score decreased more than one point means better outcome.The Murray scoring system range from 0 to 4 according to the severity of the condition.
7 days after randomization
Lower Murray lung injury score
Time Frame: 14 days after randomization
Murray lung injury score decreased more than one point means better outcome.The Murray scoring system range from 0 to 4 according to the severity of the condition.
14 days after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The difference of PaO2/FiO2 between two groups
Time Frame: 7 days after randomization
PaO2/FiO2 denotes ratio of arterial partial pressure of O2 and the fraction of inspired oxygen, with a higher PaO2/FiO2 means favorable outcome.
7 days after randomization
Lower Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score
Time Frame: 7 days after randomization
Lower SOFA score means better outcome. The SOFA score system range from 0 to 24 according to the severity of the condition.
7 days after randomization
Mechanical ventilation support
Time Frame: 7 days after randomization
Percentage of patients requiring Mechanical ventilation support
7 days after randomization
The difference of PaO2/FiO2 between two groups
Time Frame: 14 days after randomization
PaO2/FiO2 denotes ratio of arterial partial pressure of O2 and the fraction of inspired oxygen, with a higher PaO2/FiO2 means favorable outcome.
14 days after randomization
Lower Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score
Time Frame: 14 days after randomization
Lower SOFA score means better outcome. The SOFA score system range from 0 to 24 according to the severity of the condition.
14 days after randomization
Mechanical ventilation support
Time Frame: 14 days after randomization
Percentage of patients requiring Mechanical ventilation support
14 days after randomization
Clearance of noval coronavirus
Time Frame: 14 days after randomization
Clearance of noval coronavirus in upper respiratory tract or lower respiratory tract
14 days after randomization
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: 30 days after randomization
All-cause mortality
30 days after randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 26, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 13, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

April 13, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COVID-19 Infections

Clinical Trials on Standard care

3
Subscribe