- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04245566
Prostatic Artery Embolization vs. Pharmacotherapy for LUTS/BPH (EMPATHY)
January 25, 2021 updated by: Dominik Abt
Prostatic Artery Embolization vs. Pharmacotherapy for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
This study compares safety and efficacy of prostatic artery embolization and pharmacotherapy in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms associated wit benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
425
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Dominik ABT, MD
- Phone Number: 41714941418
- Email: dominik.abt@kssg.ch
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
45 years to 100 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Male
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- men ≥45 years of age
- lower urinary tract symptoms assigned to BPH (diagnosis by medical history and physical examination)
- IPSS ≥ 8 points
- QoL ≥ 3 points
- Qmax ≤ 15 ml/s with a minimum voided volume ≥ 125 ml
- informed consent for study participation
Exclusion Criteria:
- renal impairment (GFR < 30ml/min)
- previous prostatic surgery
- 5-alpha reductase inhibitor (5-ARI) use within 6 mo (or dutasteride within 12 mo) prior to entry, or use of an α-blocker or phytotherapy for BPH within 2 weeks prior to entry
- history or evidence of prostate cancer
- absolute indication for surgical treatment of complications related to BPH (i.e. bladder stones, renal impairment due to bladder outlet obstruction)
- history of neurogenic bladder dysfunction
- not able to complete questionnaires due to cognitive or thought disorders
- language skills insufficient for informed consent and / or completion of questionnaires
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: Prostatic Artery Embolization (PAE)
PAE will be performed as an inpatient or outpatient procedure by interventional radiologists who are familiar with the procedure and according to established techniques.
A unilateral femoral sheath is placed in the right common femoral artery under local anaesthesia.
The prostatic arterial supply is identified by selective internal iliac arteriography.
Prostatic arteries are selectively catheterised and embolised by use of 250-600 μm microspheres .
PAE is performed bilaterally if possible and considered successful in the absence of the normal blush of the prostate and stasis of flow in the prostate arteries on angiography after embolisation.
|
Prostatic artery embolization will be performed under local anesthesia according to well established and standardized techniques.
|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Pharmocotherapy
Pharmacotherapy will be performed using α1-blockers and 5α-reductase inhibitors in accordance with the EAU recommendations.
Thus, patients with a prostate size smaller than 40mL will be treated with 0.4 mg tamsulosin once daily, while patients with larger prostates will be treated with 0.4 mg tamsulosin plus 0.5 mg dutasteride once daily during the complete study follow-up.
|
Pharmacotherapy will be performed using α1-blockers and 5α-reductase inhibitors in accordance with the EAU recommendations
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS)
Time Frame: 24 months after treatment initiation
|
The International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) measures the degree of symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
Range of values 0-35 points.
Higher values indicate more severe symptoms.
|
24 months after treatment initiation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS)
Time Frame: 6 weeks after treatment initiation
|
The International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) measures the degree of symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
Range of values 0-35 points.
Higher values indicate more severe symptoms.
|
6 weeks after treatment initiation
|
International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS)
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment initiation
|
The International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) measures the degree of symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
Range of values 0-35 points.
Higher values indicate more severe symptoms.
|
6 months after treatment initiation
|
International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS)
Time Frame: 1 year after treatment initiation
|
The International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) measures the degree of symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
Range of values 0-35 points.
Higher values indicate more severe symptoms.
|
1 year after treatment initiation
|
International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS)
Time Frame: 5 year after treatment initiation
|
The International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) measures the degree of symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
Range of values 0-35 points.
Higher values indicate more severe symptoms.
|
5 year after treatment initiation
|
Self-assessed goal achievement (SAGA)
Time Frame: 6 weeks after treatment initiation
|
SAGA is a PROM focusing on individual treatment goals SAGA is a patient reported outcome measure focusing on individual treatment goals
|
6 weeks after treatment initiation
|
Self-assessed goal achievement (SAGA)
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment initiation
|
SAGA is a PROM focusing on individual treatment goals SAGA is a patient reported outcome measure focusing on individual treatment SAGA is a PROM focusing on individual treatment goals
|
6 months after treatment initiation
|
Self-assessed goal achievement (SAGA)
Time Frame: 1 year after treatment initiation
|
SAGA is a PROM focusing on individual treatment goals SAGA is a patient reported outcome measure focusing on individual treatment goals
|
1 year after treatment initiation
|
Self-assessed goal achievement (SAGA)
Time Frame: 2 years after treatment initiation
|
SAGA is a PROM focusing on individual treatment goals SAGA is a patient reported outcome measure focusing on individual treatment goals
|
2 years after treatment initiation
|
Self-assessed goal achievement (SAGA)
Time Frame: 5 years after treatment initiation
|
SAGA is a PROM focusing on individual treatment goals SAGA is a patient reported outcome measure focusing on individual treatment goals
|
5 years after treatment initiation
|
Maximum urinary stream (Qmax)
Time Frame: 6 weeks after treatment initiation
|
Urinary stream will be measured by free uroflowmetry and recorded in mL per second.
Higher values indicate a better maximum urinary stream.
|
6 weeks after treatment initiation
|
Maximum urinary stream (Qmax)
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment initiation
|
Urinary stream will be measured by free uroflowmetry and recorded in mL per second.
Higher values indicate a better maximum urinary stream.
|
6 months after treatment initiation
|
Maximum urinary stream (Qmax)
Time Frame: 1 year after treatment initiation
|
Urinary stream will be measured by free uroflowmetry and recorded in mL per second.
Higher values indicate a better maximum urinary stream.
|
1 year after treatment initiation
|
Maximum urinary stream (Qmax)
Time Frame: 2 years after treatment initiation
|
Urinary stream will be measured by free uroflowmetry and recorded in mL per second.
Higher values indicate a better maximum urinary stream.
|
2 years after treatment initiation
|
Maximum urinary stream (Qmax)
Time Frame: 5 years after treatment initiation
|
Urinary stream will be measured by free uroflowmetry and recorded in mL per second.
Higher values indicate a better maximum urinary stream.
|
5 years after treatment initiation
|
Post void residual urine (PVR)
Time Frame: 6 weeks after treatment initiation
|
Post void residual is measured after voiding by transabdominal ultrasound and calculated in mL.
Higher values indicate more post void residual urine and a worse ability to empty the bladder.
|
6 weeks after treatment initiation
|
Post void residual urine (PVR)
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment initiation
|
Post void residual is measured after voiding by transabdominal ultrasound and calculated in mL.
Higher values indicate more post void residual urine and a worse ability to empty the bladder.
|
6 months after treatment initiation
|
Post void residual urine (PVR)
Time Frame: 1 year after treatment initiation
|
Post void residual is measured after voiding by transabdominal ultrasound and calculated in mL.
Higher values indicate more post void residual urine and a worse ability to empty the bladder.
|
1 year after treatment initiation
|
Post void residual urine (PVR)
Time Frame: 2 years after treatment initiation
|
Post void residual is measured after voiding by transabdominal ultrasound and calculated in mL.
Higher values indicate more post void residual urine and a worse ability to empty the bladder.
|
2 years after treatment initiation
|
Post void residual urine (PVR)
Time Frame: 5 years after treatment initiation
|
Post void residual is measured after voiding by transabdominal ultrasound and calculated in mL.
Higher values indicate more post void residual urine and a worse ability to empty the bladder.
|
5 years after treatment initiation
|
Prostate volume
Time Frame: 6 moths after treatment initiation
|
Prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasound.
This examination is only performed at selected food-up visits (i.e.
6mo, 2y, 5y)
|
6 moths after treatment initiation
|
Prostate volume
Time Frame: 2 years after treatment initiation
|
Prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasound.
This examination is only performed at selected food-up visits (i.e.
6mo, 2y, 5y)
|
2 years after treatment initiation
|
Prostate volume
Time Frame: 5 years after treatment initiation
|
Prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasound.
This examination is only performed at selected food-up visits (i.e.
6mo, 2y, 5y)
|
5 years after treatment initiation
|
Prostate specific antigen (PSA)
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment initiation
|
laboratory test
|
6 months after treatment initiation
|
Prostate specific antigen (PSA)
Time Frame: 1 year after treatment initiation
|
laboratory test
|
1 year after treatment initiation
|
Prostate specific antigen (PSA)
Time Frame: 2 years after treatment initiation
|
laboratory test
|
2 years after treatment initiation
|
Prostate specific antigen (PSA)
Time Frame: 5 years after treatment initiation
|
laboratory test
|
5 years after treatment initiation
|
Safety / adverse events
Time Frame: 6 weeks after treatment initiation
|
Number of patients developing adverse events: Classification will be performed according to Clavien-Dindo classification and CTCAE.
|
6 weeks after treatment initiation
|
Safety / adverse events
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment initiation
|
Number of patients developing adverse events: Classification will be performed according to Clavien-Dindo classification and CTCAE.
|
6 months after treatment initiation
|
Safety / adverse events
Time Frame: 1 year after treatment initiation
|
Number of patients developing adverse events: Classification will be performed according to Clavien-Dindo classification and CTCAE.
|
1 year after treatment initiation
|
Safety / adverse events
Time Frame: 2 year after treatment initiation
|
Number of patients developing adverse events: Classification will be performed according to Clavien-Dindo classification and CTCAE.
|
2 year after treatment initiation
|
Safety / adverse events
Time Frame: 5 year after treatment initiation
|
Number of patients developing adverse events: Classification will be performed according to Clavien-Dindo classification and CTCAE.
|
5 year after treatment initiation
|
Erectile function
Time Frame: 6 weeks after treatment initiation
|
Assessed by the questionnaire IIEF-5.
Score of IIEF-5 can range from 0 to 25 points.
Higher values indicate a better erectile function.
|
6 weeks after treatment initiation
|
Erectile function
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment initiation
|
Assessed by the questionnaire IIEF-5.
Score of IIEF-5 can range from 0 to 25 points.
Higher values indicate a better erectile function.
|
6 months after treatment initiation
|
Erectile function
Time Frame: 1 year after treatment initiation
|
Assessed by the questionnaire IIEF-5.
Score of IIEF-5 can range from 0 to 25 points.
Higher values indicate a better erectile function.
|
1 year after treatment initiation
|
Erectile function
Time Frame: 2 year after treatment initiation
|
Assessed by the questionnaire IIEF-5.
Score of IIEF-5 can range from 0 to 25 points.
Higher values indicate a better erectile function.
|
2 year after treatment initiation
|
Erectile function
Time Frame: 5 year after treatment initiation
|
Assessed by the questionnaire IIEF-5.
Score of IIEF-5 can range from 0 to 25 points.
Higher values indicate a better erectile function.
|
5 year after treatment initiation
|
Ejaculatory function
Time Frame: 6 weeks after treatment initiation
|
Assessed by the questionnaire Male Sexual Health Questionnaire-Ejaculation Dysfunction Short Form (MSHQ-EjD).
Ejaculatory function total score (questions 1-3, possible range 0-15, higher values indicate better ejaculatory function, and MSHQ-EjD ejaculatory bother item (question 4, possible range 0-5, higher values indicate more bother).
|
6 weeks after treatment initiation
|
Ejaculatory function
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment initiation
|
Assessed by the questionnaire Male Sexual Health Questionnaire-Ejaculation Dysfunction Short Form (MSHQ-EjD).
Ejaculatory function total score (questions 1-3, possible range 0-15, higher values indicate better ejaculatory function, and MSHQ-EjD ejaculatory bother item (question 4, possible range 0-5, higher values indicate more bother).
|
6 months after treatment initiation
|
Ejaculatory function
Time Frame: 1 year after treatment initiation
|
Assessed by the questionnaire Male Sexual Health Questionnaire-Ejaculation Dysfunction Short Form (MSHQ-EjD).
Ejaculatory function total score (questions 1-3, possible range 0-15, higher values indicate better ejaculatory function, and MSHQ-EjD ejaculatory bother item (question 4, possible range 0-5, higher values indicate more bother).
|
1 year after treatment initiation
|
Ejaculatory function
Time Frame: 2 years after treatment initiation
|
Assessed by the questionnaire Male Sexual Health Questionnaire-Ejaculation Dysfunction Short Form (MSHQ-EjD).
Ejaculatory function total score (questions 1-3, possible range 0-15, higher values indicate better ejaculatory function, and MSHQ-EjD ejaculatory bother item (question 4, possible range 0-5, higher values indicate more bother).
|
2 years after treatment initiation
|
Ejaculatory function
Time Frame: 5 years after treatment initiation
|
Assessed by the questionnaire Male Sexual Health Questionnaire-Ejaculation Dysfunction Short Form (MSHQ-EjD).
Ejaculatory function total score (questions 1-3, possible range 0-15, higher values indicate better ejaculatory function, and MSHQ-EjD ejaculatory bother item (question 4, possible range 0-5, higher values indicate more bother).
|
5 years after treatment initiation
|
Need for additional drug treatment, surgical treatment or change of medical treatment assessed
Time Frame: 6 weeks after treatment initiation
|
assessed by patient interviews at follow up visit
|
6 weeks after treatment initiation
|
Need for additional drug treatment, surgical treatment or change of medical treatment assessed
Time Frame: 6 moths after treatment initiation
|
assessed by patient interviews at follow up visit
|
6 moths after treatment initiation
|
Need for additional drug treatment, surgical treatment or change of medical treatment assessed
Time Frame: 1 year after treatment initiation
|
assessed by patient interviews at follow up visit
|
1 year after treatment initiation
|
Need for additional drug treatment, surgical treatment or change of medical treatment assessed
Time Frame: 2 years after treatment initiation
|
assessed by patient interviews at follow up visit
|
2 years after treatment initiation
|
Need for additional drug treatment, surgical treatment or change of medical treatment assessed
Time Frame: 5 years after treatment initiation
|
assessed by patient interviews at follow up visit
|
5 years after treatment initiation
|
Analysis of cost-effectiveness using quality-adjusted life years (QALY)
Time Frame: 2 years after treatment initiation
|
One QALY equates to one year in perfect health.
QALY scores range from 1 (perfect health) to 0 (dead).
To estimate QALY costs will be calculated by calculation of treatment costs, and quality of life will be assessed using the questionnaire EQ-5D.
EQ-5D measures five dimensions (5D); mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
Respondents self-rate their level of severity for each dimension using a five-level scale.
The questionnaire can define 3,125 different health states.
|
2 years after treatment initiation
|
Analysis of cost-effectiveness using quality-adjusted life years (QALY)
Time Frame: 5 years after treatment initiation
|
One QALY equates to one year in perfect health.
QALY scores range from 1 (perfect health) to 0 (dead).
To estimate QALY costs will be calculated by calculation of treatment costs, and quality of life will be assessed using the questionnaire EQ-5D.
EQ-5D measures five dimensions (5D); mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
Respondents self-rate their level of severity for each dimension using a five-level scale.
The questionnaire can define 3,125 different health states.
|
5 years after treatment initiation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ANTICIPATED)
September 1, 2021
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
December 1, 2022
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
December 1, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 23, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 25, 2020
First Posted (ACTUAL)
January 29, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
January 26, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 25, 2021
Last Verified
January 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CTU19/025
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
At the end of the study, data are stored in a publicly accessible repository (e.g.
Harvard Dataverse or Zenodo, depending on whether the data should be stored on a server in America or Europe). All elements are stored with a unique Digital Object Identifier (DOI), which can be referenced in the respective publication.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
At the end of the study.
Availability for at least 10 years.
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
-
St. Joseph's Healthcare HamiltonOntario Ministry of Health and Long Term CareCompletedBenign Prostatic HyperplasiaCanada
-
San Carlo di Nancy HospitalElesta S.R.L.CompletedBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia | Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy | Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy With Outflow Obstruction | Prostate HyperplasiaItaly
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia
-
Catholic University of the Sacred HeartCompletedBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) | Benign Prostatic Enlargement (BPE)Italy
-
Boston Scientific CorporationCompletedProstatic Hyperplasia | Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia | Prostatic Hyperplasia, Benign | Prostatic Hypertrophy | Prostatic Hypertrophy, Benign | Adenoma, Prostatic | Prostatic Adenoma | RezumDominican Republic, Czechia, Sweden
-
Boston Scientific CorporationCompletedBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia | Prostatic Hyperplasia, Benign | Prostatic Hypertrophy | Prostatic Hypertrophy, Benign | Adenoma, Prostatic | Prostatic Adenoma | RezumDominican Republic
-
IMBiotechnologies Ltd.CompletedBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia | Benign Prostatic HypertrophyCanada
-
IRCCS Policlinico S. MatteoCompletedBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia | Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy With Outflow ObstructionItaly
-
American Medical SystemsCompletedBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia | BPH | Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy | Prostate Disease
-
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam...Not yet recruitingLower Urinary Tract Symptoms | Benign Prostate Hyperplasia | Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy With Outflow Obstruction
Clinical Trials on Prostatic Artery Embolization (PAE)
-
Dominik AbtCompletedProstate CancerSwitzerland
-
Group of Research in Minimally Invasive TechniquesUniversidad de Zaragoza; Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano BlesaWithdrawnBenign Prostatic HyperplasiaSpain
-
Shivank BhatiaMerit Medical Systems, Inc.; Society of Interventional Radiology FoundationTerminatedProstate CancerUnited States
-
University of Mississippi Medical CenterRecruitingLower Urinary Tract Symptoms | Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)United States
-
University of MinnesotaCompletedBenign Prostatic HyperplasiaUnited States
-
Stanford UniversityRecruiting
-
Andrew PicelWithdrawnLower Urinary Tract Symptoms | Benign Prostatic HyperplasiaUnited States
-
Daniel Stephan EngelerCompletedBenign Prostatic HyperplasiaSwitzerland
-
University of CalgaryIMBiotechnologies Ltd.Not yet recruiting
-
St. Louis UniversityWithdrawnLower Urinary Tract Symptoms | Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia | Urinary Incontinence, Urge | Nocturia | Incontinence, Urinary | Urinary Frequency/UrgencyUnited States