Developing and Pilot Testing an Opioid Tapering Protocol (TapPro)

September 11, 2023 updated by: Hector Perez, Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Developing and Pilot Testing an Intervention to Increase Opioid Tapering in Primary Care

This study proposes to pilot test an intervention to facilitate opioid pain reliever (OPR) tapering in primary care. The intervention will incorporate a clinician embedded within primary care to follow tapering dose schedules to support providers as well to deliver a psychosocial curriculum to support and engage patients. In a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT), the study will examine the preliminary efficacy and feasibility of the manualized, protocol-based tapering intervention ("TapPro") compared to usual care. As there is no standard definition or outcome for tapering, the primary efficacy outcome is a decrease in OPR dose over six months. Separately, the study proposes a clinically meaningful dose reduction (greater than or equal to 30 percent) as a secondary outcome. The central hypotheses' are that a tapering intervention with patient and provider support is feasible in a primary care setting and can result in greater dose reduction when compared to usual care.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In a 12-week randomized controlled trial based in a primary care outpatient clinic, the study will recruit 60 patients on moderate to high dose chronic opioid therapy for whom providers recommend opioid tapering and randomize 1:1 to an opioid tapering protocolized intervention (TapPro) or to usual care. Over three months, participants in the TapPro arm will visit with a clinician on the telephone on a biweekly basis in order to facilitate opioid prescribing and tapering and a pain self-care and coping curriculum. In the control arm, participants will see their primary care providers as per usual and decisions on opioid prescribing and tapering will be made by the primary care providers. Participants will be assessed throughout the study with questionnaires, urine drug screens, prescription database review, and medical record review.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10467
        • Montefiore Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. age ≥ 18
  2. chronic prescription opioid use (>3 monthly prescriptions from the clinic within prior 6 months)
  3. morphine milligram equivalents (MME) ≥50
  4. poorly controlled pain (PEG pain score ≥ 5/10)
  5. providers considering opioid taper but no reductions in opioid dose over the past 6 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Active cancer or other serious progressive illness, by medical review and by self-report
  2. Moderate or severe opioid use disorder, as per DSM-V
  3. Inability to give informed consent
  4. Active suicidal ideation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: TapPro
Biweekly telephone and in-person visits with a clinician over three months. At each visit, a protocol adapted from the Prescription Opioid Taper Study will be provided to participants, who will learn about pain coping, distraction techniques, diaphragmatic breathing, sleep techniques, and progressive muscle relaxation techniques. All are specifically designed for patients with chronic pain on chronic opioid therapy. During visits, taper parameters will be discussed and the provider will work through a dose reduction schedule, if participants are in agreement. Additionally, urine drug screens will be obtained.
Manualized intervention administered by a clinician to facilitate opioid tapering during clinical visits.
No Intervention: Usual Care
Participants randomized to the usual care arm will continue seeing their primary care providers as indicated.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in opioid dose over six months
Time Frame: Up to six months
Repeated measure analysis of opioid dosage over six months
Up to six months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Opioid dose reduction
Time Frame: Up to six months
Dichotomous outcome assessing whether participant reached a thirty percent or greater opioid dose reduction
Up to six months
Patient reported pain score
Time Frame: Up to six months
Repeated measure analysis of pain severity, as per the PEG pain screening tool. The PEG is a 3 item scale that assesses pain intensity and interference on a 0 to 10 scale where 0 equals "no pain" and 10 is "pain as bad as you can imagine"
Up to six months
Pain interference
Time Frame: Up to six months
Repeated measures analysis of pain interference, as per the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) pain interference subscale. The BPI pain interference subscale is scored as the mean of 7 interference items, scored from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes).
Up to six months
Pain related self-efficacy
Time Frame: Up to six months
Repeated measures analysis of pain related self-efficacy, as per the Pain Self-Efficacy Scale. The Pain Self-Efficacy scale consists of 10 questions that assess a patient's confidence in performing tasks in spite of pain. It is scored from 0 (not at all confident) to 6 (completely confident). Higher scores are better.
Up to six months
Change in Quality of life score
Time Frame: Up to six months
Repeated measures analysis of two different quality of life scores, as per the EQ-5D and the Assessment of Quality of Life 8-item scale (AQoL-8D). The EQ-5D measures quality of life in 5 different domains in 5 questions. The AQoL-8D measures quality of life in 8 different domains in 35 questions. Higher scores denote greater quality of life.
Up to six months
Depressive symptoms
Time Frame: Up to six months
Repeated measures analysis of depression scores, as per the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). This is a 20 item questionnaire that assesses the frequency of several depressive symptoms, rated from 0 (rarely or none of the time) to 3 (most or all of the time). Lower scores mean fewer depressive symptoms.
Up to six months
Anxiety symptoms
Time Frame: Up to six months
Repeated measures analysis of anxiety scores, as per the Brief symptom anxiety subscale. This is a 40 item questionnaire that assesses the frequency of symptoms of anxiety. It is scored from 1 (almost never) to 4 (almost always). Lower scores mean less anxiety.
Up to six months
Pain catastrophizing
Time Frame: Up to six months
Repeated measures analysis of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. This is a 13 item scale scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time) about symptoms associated with pain catastrophizing. Lower scores denote less pain catastrophizing.
Up to six months
Sleep quality
Time Frame: Up to six months
Repeated measures analysis of sleep quality, as per the Adult Sickle Cell Quality of Life Measurement Information System (ASCQ-ME) Sleep Impact Short Form. This is a 5 item survey of sleep symptoms, scored from 1 (always) to 5 (never), with higher scores meaning more problems with sleep.
Up to six months
Opioid Misuse
Time Frame: Up to six months
Repeated measures analysis of opioid misuse, as per the Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) score. It is a 17 item survey, rated from 0 (never) to 4 (very often), assessing behaviors associated with opioid misuse. Higher scores are associated with greater opioid misuse.
Up to six months
Opioid Knowledge
Time Frame: Up to six months
Change in Opioid Knowledge score, as per the Survey for Pain Attitudes, Knowledge, and Beliefs (SOPA+KB). This is an 18 question survey that assesses agreement with several pain statements, rated from 1 (do not agree) to 4 (completely agree). Higher scores denote better knowledge.
Up to six months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Retention in care
Time Frame: 12 months
Dichotomous outcome -more than or equal to 1 visit with primary care physician (PCP) during six month study period AND more than or equal to 1 visit with PCP during next six months
12 months
Percent of patients attending clinic visits
Time Frame: 6 months
Percent of patients who attend their clinic visits
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hector R Perez, MD, MS, Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 4, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 4, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 6, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2019-10910
  • K23DA044327 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

As this is a pilot study, we have elected to not allow for data to be available to other researchers for secondary analyses.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Subscribe