Clinical Trial for Near Infrared Endoventricular Illumination for Neuroprotection in Very Early Cases of Parkinson's Disease (Ev-NIRT) (Ev-NIRT)

November 28, 2023 updated by: University Hospital, Grenoble

Parkinson's disease has only pharmacological (essentially dopaminergic) and surgical treatment (essentially high-frequency deep brain stimulation), that are symptomatically effective. none of them is curative, and has the ability to slow down the disease and to protect dopaminergic neurons from death by neurodegeneration. Experimental results, based on preclinical studies, suggest that brain illumination in the Near-InfraRed (NIR) range is likely to slow down this neurodegenerative process.

Thus, a medical device system (called Ev-NIRT) has been developed for 670 nm intracerebral illumination of the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc), and is planned to be tested for the treatment of Parkinson's disease.

In this pilot study the investigators will evaluate the feasibility and tolerance of surgery and brain illumination thanks to the Ev-NIRT medical device, in a group of 7 de novo Parkinson's patients implanted with the innovative medical device. Patients will be monitored for 4 years.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The level of neuroprotection induced by illumination at 670nm appears effective in preclinical studies, and justify the transfer into a clinical trial. The investigators currently have developed and produced implantable devices, to be implanted into the brain through a minimally invasive endoventricular route. The electrical energy required is supplied by the batteries adapted from those used for deep brain stimulation.

The feasibility of trans ventricular implantation is ensured by the experience gained by our team in the endoventricular stimulation of the posterior hypothalamus in the cluster headache.

In this clinical study, the investigators will evaluate the tolerance and safety of intraventricular surgical technic and illumination by the Ev-NIRT medical device implanted into the brain of 7 patients with Parkinson's disease. idiopathic, aged 25-65 years, at a very early stage (less than 2 years of evolution). The NIR illumination will begin immediately after surgery.

The investigators will also evaluate secondarily, the neuroprotective effect of this new treatment modality, by comparing the decrease of dopaminergic neurons by Positron Emission Tomography (PET)-scan using [11C]PE2I) tracer of implanted patients to that of a control group of 7 patients whose characteristics in terms of duration of evolution and clinical severity are identical, but who are not implanted, and therefore not exposed to NIR illumination.

The PET-scan-PE2I exam is conducted in both groups annually for 4 years (a total of 5 measurements) and compared to the PE2I PET obtained at the beginning of participation in the study. A group-wide comparison will be made between the NIR group and the control group.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

14

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Grenoble, France, 38000
        • Recruiting
        • CLINATEC
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Stephan CHABARDES, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Clinically diagnosed idiopathic Parkinson's disease according to MDS criteria developed by R.B. Postuma (Anang et al, Neurology, 2014)
  2. Dopaminergic denervation confirmed in PET [11C]PE2I with a decrease in tracer fixation at the striatum level of at least 30% on average compared to the white matter fixation of the cerebellum
  3. Patients willing to start dopaminergic treatment
  4. Very early stage of the disease:

    1. Diagnosis of recent Parkinson's disease (less than two years after a neurologist's diagnosis)
    2. Hoehn and Yahr Stage 1 to 2
    3. Maximum 2 tremor on the MDS-UPDRS scale
    4. Naive of any anti-Parkinsonian treatment
  5. Between 25 and 65 years of age
  6. Score on Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scale below the value of 20
  7. Easy handling of the French language in oral and written language
  8. Social security affiliates or beneficiaries of such a scheme
  9. Informed and written consent signed by the patient

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. All categories of protected persons: pregnant woman, parturient, breastfeeding mother, person deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision, person subject to a measure of legal protection, hospitalized for psychiatric disorder
  2. Carcinological history in the previous 5 years, not stabilized
  3. Uncontrolled medical condition that may lead to complications
  4. Preoperative brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) showing brain damage that may be responsible for Parkinson's syndrome or a significant surgical risk (e.g. vascular malformation)
  5. Surgical or anesthetic contraindication
  6. History of brain infection with herpes virus
  7. Contraindication to MRI (claustrophobia, non-compatible mri metal prosthesis, etc.)
  8. Predictable need for frequent use of MRI scans after surgery
  9. Unstabilized psychotropic treatment
  10. Patient with cognitive impairment at the outset of illness (Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score - 26)
  11. Atypias suspecting atypical Parkinson's syndrome
  12. Chronic treatment with L-Dopa or dopamine agonist
  13. Presence of another serious pathology (major depressive episode, suicidal patient, active psychosis ...)
  14. Participation in another interventional clinical trial
  15. Wearing pace makers other than brain

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Illuminated arm
patients with intraventricular near-infrared light illumination
Endoventricular near infra red treatment : Intraventricular pulsed, chronic, cyclic, near-infrared illumination of the Central Nervous System (CNS) at 150 Hz, 15 mW, 1 minute ON and 5 minutes OFF
No Intervention: control arm
patients without any medical device

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Ev-NIRT Treatment on Emergent Adverse Events (Tolerance) after surgical intervention and NIR illumination following the implantation of the Ev-NIRT medical device
Time Frame: 4 years
Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]
4 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Characterization of annual neuronal loss observed by decrease in tracer fixation at the striatum level
Time Frame: 4 years
Annual measurement of dopaminergic denervation in Positron Emission Tomography (PET) using [11C]PE2I tracer fixation at the striatum level in percentage compared to the white matter fixation of the cerebellum
4 years
Evaluation of the motor clinical signs progression
Time Frame: 4 years
Scores on the Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS scale sections II, III and IV) [0-100% : higher scores mean worse outcome]
4 years
Evaluation of the non-motor bahavioral signs progression
Time Frame: 4 years
Scores on the non-motor scales Behavioral Evaluation in Parkinson's disease (ECMP) [0-4 : higher scores mean worse outcome]
4 years
Evaluation of the non-motor clinical signs progression
Time Frame: 4 years
Scores on the non-motor scales Lille Apathy Rating Scale (LARS) [-4/+4 : higher scores mean worse outcome]
4 years
Evaluation of depression signs progression
Time Frame: 4 years
Scores on the non-motor scales Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) [0-3 : higher scores mean worse outcome]
4 years
Evaluation of the non-motor symptoms signs progression
Time Frame: 4 years
Scores on the non-motor scales Non Motor Symptoms scale (NMS) [0-30 : higher scores mean better outcome]
4 years
Comparison between the date of diagnosis and the date of introduction of substitution therapy with dopaminergic drugs or dopamine agonists
Time Frame: 4 years
Time period between the date of diagnosis and the date of introduction of dopaminergic substitute therapy or dopaminergic agonists
4 years
Evolution of this prescription of substitution therapy over the duration of study
Time Frame: 4 years
Follow up of dosage of dopaminergic substitute therapy or dopaminergic agonists
4 years
Assessment in both groups of the time it takes for the onset of different motor symptoms (including tremor, akinesia and stiffness, speech, walking and balance disorders) and not motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease in relation to initial diagnosis.
Time Frame: 4 years
Time period between the date of diagnosis and the date of onset of different motor and non-motor symptoms objectified by an increase in item scores specific to these symptoms on the Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS scale) passed into OFF drug [0-100% : higher scores mean worse outcome]
4 years
Evolution of the quality of life of patients in both groups
Time Frame: 4 years
Parkinson Disease Quotation (PDQ-39) quiz score [0-4 : higher scores mean worse outcome]
4 years
Evolution of walking speed in both patient groups
Time Frame: 4 years
Right and left foot speed measured during a walking task on the Vicon platform without and with dopaminergic treatment
4 years
Evolution of walking parameters in both patient groups
Time Frame: 4 years
Score in the "freezing of gait" questionnaire [0-24 : higher scores mean worse outcome] without and with dopaminergic treatment
4 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stephan CHABARDES, MD, PhD, University Hospital, Grenoble

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 14, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 27, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 10, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 29, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Very Early Stage of Parkinson's Disease

Clinical Trials on Ev-NIRT

3
Subscribe