Role of Auditory Cortical Oscillations in Speech Processing and Dyslexia

February 17, 2020 updated by: Anne-Lise Giraud, University of Geneva, Switzerland

Role of Auditory Cortical Oscillations in Speech Processing and Its Dysfunction in Dyslexia Through Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation

This study aims at investigating the role of low-gamma activity in phonemic encoding and its implication in dyslexia. Indeed, a phonological deficit, i.e. a difficulty in perceiving the sounds of speech, is strongly suspected in dyslexia but has never been conclusively associated with a specific underlying mechanism.

The study employs transcranial alternating current stimulation in adults with and without dyslexia to exploit the effect of the stimulation on phonemic processing and neural activity measured with electroencephalography. In doing so, it would be possible to establishing a causal link between gamma oscillations and the phonological deficit in dyslexia.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Geneva, Switzerland, 1202
        • Campus Biotech Geneva

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18-65 years old;
  • French native speakers;
  • normally-hearing;
  • intellectual quotient (IQ) around average;
  • for the dyslexia group: previous diagnosis of dyslexia as assessed by a speech therapist.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of metal or electronic implants in the brain/skull;
  • Presence of metal or electronic device at other in other parts of the body;
  • Have experienced a seizure or a loss of consciousness or a severe head trauma;
  • Severe brain related illness ;
  • Intake of central nervous system-effective medication;
  • Pregnant and nursing women;
  • Relatives affected by epilepsy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: tACS in individuals with and without dyslexia
Each participant in both the group of normo-readers and individuals with dyslexia receive all tACS stimulation conditions (fixed frequencies and sham) over different experimental days.
Focal transcranial stimulation over auditory cortex by means of 5 electrodes delivering an electric current (max. 2mA). In addition to active stimulation, also a placebo (sham) stimulation is employed as a control condition. All subjects included in the study receive all tACS stimulation conditions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measure low-gamma neural oscillations with electroencephalography recordings
Time Frame: 6 hour

Auditory-steady state responses to auditory stimuli are measured to assess specific differences between individuals with dyslexia and normo-readers, and between the different tACS stimulation conditions before, after and 1h after the 20 min. tACS stimulation.

These neural correlated are estimated by considering the power of EEG signal at the frequency used to modulate the auditory stimuli.

6 hour
Changes in linguistic performance through a battery of behavioral tests
Time Frame: 6 hours
Measurement of phonemic and syllabic processing (pseudoword repetition and spoonerism test), and reading (reading a 3 min. text, both accuracy and reading speed are considered) skills. These tests are repeated before, after and 1h after the tACS stimulation.
6 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anne-Lise Giraud, Prof., University of Genova

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dyslexia

Clinical Trials on Transcranial alternating current stimulation

Subscribe