Post-Neoadjuvant Treatment MRI Based AI System to Predict pCR for Rectal Cancer (MR-AI-pCR)

October 25, 2022 updated by: wanxiangbo, Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University

A Post-Neoadjuvant Treatment MRI Based AI System to Predict Pathologic Complete Response for Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter, Prospective Clinical Study

In this study, investigators seek for a better way to identify the potential pathologic complete response (pCR) patients form non-pCR patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), based on their post-neoadjuvant treatment Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data.

Previously, a post neoadjuvant treatment MRI based radiomics AI model had been constructed and trained. Here, the predictive power of this artificial intelligence system and expert radiologist to identify pCR patients from non-pCR LARC patients will be compared in this prospective, multicenter, back-to-back clinical study

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a multicenter, prospective, observational clinical study for seeking out a better way to predict the pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) based on the post-neoadjuvant treatment Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data. Patients who have been pathologically diagnosed as rectal adenocarcinoma and defined as clinical II-III stage will be enrolled from the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital and the Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical College. All participants should follow a standard treatment protocol, including neoadjuvant treatment, total mesorectum excision (TME) surgery. Patients with LARC who received neoadjuvant treatment will be enrolled and their post-neoadjuvant treatment MRI images will be used to predict their pathologic response (pCR vs. non-pCR). The artificial intelligence prediction system and the expert radiologist will define the pathologic response as pCR or non-pCR, respectively. The pathologist will provide the final pathology report of TME surgery specimen (pCR or non-pCR) as a standard. The predictive efficacy of these two back-to-back approaches generated will be compared in this multicenter, prospective clinical study.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

205

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510655
        • Recruiting
        • The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
    • Yunnan
      • Kunming, Yunnan, China, 650000
        • Recruiting
        • The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical College
    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310000
        • Recruiting
        • Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

In the study, the population are the patients with LARC, who receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy and TME surgery. The response of neoadjuvant treatment is unknown.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • pathologically diagnosed as rectal adenocarcinoma
  • defined as clinical II-III staging (≥T3, and/or positive nodal status) without distant metastasis
  • receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy
  • pre- and post-neoadjuvant treatment MRI data obtained
  • receive total mesorectum excision (TME) surgery after neoadjuvant therapy and get the pathologic assessment of tumor response

Exclusion Criteria:

  • with history of other cancer
  • insufficient imaging quality of MRI to delineate tumor volume or obtain measurements (e.g., lack of sequence, motion artifacts)
  • not completing neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy
  • tumor recurrence or distant metastasis during neoadjuvant treatment
  • not undergoing surgery resulting in lack of pathologic assessment of tumor response

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
patients will be evaluated by artificial intelligence system and expert radiologist
the patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) finished the neoadjuvant treatment, and not yet receive total mesorectum excision (TME) surgery will be enrolled. The post-neoadjuvant treatment MRI images features of each enrolled patients will be captured by the artificial intelligence system, and evaluated by experienced radiologists as well. Blind to the pathologic report of TME specimen, both approaches further respectively yield a predicted pathologic response to neoadjuvant treatment for each enrolled patient, shown as pCR or non-pCR.
The tumor ROI in the post- neoadjuvant treatment MRI images will be manually delineated, and further subjected to the AI prediction system arm to verify the predictive accuracy of this AI prediction system in identifying the pCR individuals from non-pCR patients with LARC.
The enrolled patients will be assigned to the trained experienced radiologists to evaluate their predictive accuracy in identifying the pCR individuals from non-pCR patients

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The area under curve (AUC) of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves of AI prediction system and expert radiologists in prediction tumor response
Time Frame: baseline
The area under curve (AUC) of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves of AI prediction system and expert radiologists in identifying the pCR candidates from non-pCR individuals among neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy treated LARC patients will be calculated respectively.
baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The specificity of AI prediction system and expert radiologists in prediction tumor response
Time Frame: baseline
The specificity of AI prediction system and expert radiologists in identifying the pCR candidates from non-pCR individuals among neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy treated LARC patients will be calculated respectively.
baseline
The sensitivity of AI prediction system and expert radiologists in prediction tumor response
Time Frame: baseline
The sensitivity of AI prediction system and expert radiologists in identifying the pCR candidates from non-pCR individuals among neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy treated LARC patients will be calculated respectively.
baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Xiangbo Wan, MD, PhD, Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
  • Principal Investigator: Weidong Han, MD, PhD, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Zhenhui Li, MD, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical College.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 8, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 10, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

March 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 19, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 26, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rectal Cancer

Clinical Trials on artificial intelligence prediction system

3
Subscribe