- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04286776
Memory Retrieval and Encoding Investigated by Neural Stimulation (MEMREINS)
November 4, 2024 updated by: University of Pennsylvania
The purpose of this research is to understand biomarkers of human memory through correlational analyses and to use focal electrical stimulation as a causal manipulation to understand how biomarkers of memory relate to other brain states and behavioral measures.
Study Overview
Status
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The study protocol outlines fundamental experiments to understand the neural dynamics underlying human memory and use direct brain stimulation as a tool (intervention) to study the relationship between those dynamics and memory performance.
The investigators will collect recording and stimulation data from 250 patient volunteers as they perform carefully-matched verbal and spatial memory tasks.
During non-stimulation sessions, the investigators will measure correlative neural biomarkers of memory encoding and retrieval using standard clinical depth electrodes and micro-wire recordings.
To test the causal role of these biomarkers, the investigators will employ direct brain stimulation to briefly modulate neural activity, and measure ensuing changes in behavioral performance.
With a set of causal biomarkers and predictive models in hand, the investigators will finally ask whether model-driven stimulation paradigms offer the investigators the ability to reliably modulate neural activity, and consequent behavior, in real-time.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
800
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Colorado
-
Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
- University of Colorado, Denver
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
- Emory University Hospital
-
-
Maryland
-
Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20892
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
-
-
Minnesota
-
Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
- Mayo Clinic
-
-
New Hampshire
-
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03766
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10027
- Columbia University
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
-
-
Texas
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
- UT Southwestern Medical Center
-
San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
- University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Expected to undergo intracranial implantation and postoperative electroencephalographic monitoring as part of a standard clinical procedure for the treatment of pharmacologically resistant epilepsy
- Age 18 or older
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any physical or cognitive disability or illness that would limit their ability to perform cognitive tasks
- Any medical condition that would, in the investigator's opinion, limit the subject's participation in the study.
- Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent
- MRI contraindications
Standard clinical care includes a pregnancy test for female patients prior to the surgical implantation of the electrodes. Pregnant women are not surgically implanted.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Direct Electrical Stimulation
Stimulation will be applied concurrently with the task, if applicable, and stimulation trials will be interleaved with sham trials, where no stimulation is delivered.
|
Stimulation will not exceed 0.75 mA and will be approved prior by study investigators.
Each subject will have a safety threshold testing at the beginning of each session and if 'afterdischarges' occur the subject's stimulation threshold will be lowered.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
To use direct electrical stimulation to disentangle causal versus correlative biomarkers of verbal and spatial episodic memory
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks (typical duration of hospital stay)
|
1. We will use linear mixed effects models and L2-penalized logistic regression classifiers to compare periods of successful and unsuccessful performance in our tasks
|
Up to 4 weeks (typical duration of hospital stay)
|
|
To develop and test models of human brain dynamics in the presence of electrical stimulation
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks (typical duration of hospital stay)
|
2. We will compare spectral indices of brain activity before and after stimulation as a function of stimulation parameters.
|
Up to 4 weeks (typical duration of hospital stay)
|
|
To assess how reactivation of prior memories shapes subsequent recall and memory organization, including memory for the content, context and value of experiences.
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks (typical duration of hospital stay)
|
3. We will mathematical models of neural similarity described in detail in Halpern (2024) and Manning (2011, 2012) to test the reactivation mechanisms described in Lohnas et al. (2014) and Healey and Kahana (2015).
|
Up to 4 weeks (typical duration of hospital stay)
|
|
To determine whether state-dependent stimulation can separately be used to modulate encoding and retrieval processes
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks (typical duration of hospital stay)
|
4. We will evaluate the closed-loop stimulation protocol described in Kahana et al. (2023) in both encoding and retrieval.
|
Up to 4 weeks (typical duration of hospital stay)
|
|
To determine whether stimulation is more effective at modulating memory when targeted to regions with specific connectivity profiles to the medial temporal lobe
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks (typical duration of hospital stay)
|
5. We will compare recall rates during a free recall experiment with brain stimulation at sites with high network-mediated activation, as described in Solomon et al. (2018), versus low network-mediated activation.
|
Up to 4 weeks (typical duration of hospital stay)
|
|
To determine how simultaneous stimulation at multiple target sites can be optimized to modulate memory
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks (typical duration of hospital stay)
|
6.
We will compare recall rates during a free recall experiment with no brain stimulation, stimulation at one site, and stimulation at multiple sites.
|
Up to 4 weeks (typical duration of hospital stay)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Michael Kahana, PhD, University of Pennsylvania
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Ezzyat Y, Kragel JE, Solomon EA, Lega BC, Aronson JP, Jobst BC, Gross RE, Sperling MR, Worrell GA, Sheth SA, Wanda PA, Rizzuto DS, Kahana MJ. Functional and anatomical connectivity predict brain stimulation's mnemonic effects. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2023 Aug 11:2023.07.27.550851. doi: 10.1101/2023.07.27.550851.
- Ezzyat Y, Wanda PA, Levy DF, Kadel A, Aka A, Pedisich I, Sperling MR, Sharan AD, Lega BC, Burks A, Gross RE, Inman CS, Jobst BC, Gorenstein MA, Davis KA, Worrell GA, Kucewicz MT, Stein JM, Gorniak R, Das SR, Rizzuto DS, Kahana MJ. Closed-loop stimulation of temporal cortex rescues functional networks and improves memory. Nat Commun. 2018 Feb 6;9(1):365. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02753-0.
- Kragel JE, Ezzyat Y, Lega BC, Sperling MR, Worrell GA, Gross RE, Jobst BC, Sheth SA, Zaghloul KA, Stein JM, Kahana MJ. Distinct cortical systems reinstate the content and context of episodic memories. Nat Commun. 2021 Jul 21;12(1):4444. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24393-1.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
October 12, 2014
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2024
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 24, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 24, 2020
First Posted (Actual)
February 27, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
November 5, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 4, 2024
Last Verified
November 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 820553
- 1U01NS113198-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
- 5R01NS106611-05 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
De-identified data will be shared in a public repository at regular intervals during the project.
De-identified data sets will be anonymized prior to posting on the public repository.
These de-identified data are likely to be analyzed for secondary purposes other than those described in this protocol (e.g.
seizure prediction).
Shared data will include, at a minimum, digital spreadsheets used to summarize all participant behavioral data.
De-identified electrophysiology data, demographic information, electrode localization information, and task information (e.g.
timing of each trial, timing of responses) will be shared in a central repository.
Descriptions of the tasks and stimuli will be shared.
De-identified references to individual participant data may also appear in scientific journal publications or presented at scientific meetings.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Study data will become available within six months of publication of the relevant results, with no planned expiration.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Data is freely available, will require a formal request for access.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Epilepsy Intractable
-
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityRecruiting
-
PhytoTech Therapeutics, Ltd.Completed
-
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation...Active, not recruitingEpilepsies, Partial | Intractable Epilepsy | Focal Epilepsy | Refractory Epilepsy | Epilepsy Intractable | Epilepsy in Children | Epilepsy, FocalUnited Kingdom
-
NaviFUS CorporationTaipei Veterans General Hospital, TaiwanCompletedDrug Resistant Epilepsy | Epilepsy, Drug Resistant | Intractable Epilepsy | Refractory Epilepsy | Drug Refractory Epilepsy | Epilepsy, Drug Refractory | Epilepsy, Intractable | Medication Resistant EpilepsyTaiwan
-
University of ArizonaVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Arizona State UniversityEnrolling by invitationCognition | Medically Intractable EpilepsyUnited States
-
University Health Network, TorontoUnknownMedically Intractable EpilepsyCanada
-
Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterUniversity of California, Los Angeles; Columbia University; University of California... and other collaboratorsEnrolling by invitationEpilepsy IntractableUnited States
-
Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); California Institute of TechnologyEnrolling by invitation
-
Aaron BoesNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); Stanford UniversityEnrolling by invitation
-
KU LeuvenActive, not recruitingEpilepsy IntractableBelgium
Clinical Trials on Direct electrical stimulation
-
Xuanwu Hospital, BeijingCompletedInvestigating the Role and Electrophysiological Characteristics of the Human Claustrum Based on SEEGRefractory Epilepsy | Consciousness, Loss ofChina
-
Istanbul UniversityCompletedPanic DisorderTurkey
-
Istanbul UniversityCompletedParkinson DiseaseTurkey
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedTreatment Resistant DepressionUnited States
-
University of MiamiFloridaCompleted
-
NeuFit - Neurological Fitness and EducationRecruitingRadiculopathy Lumbar | Radiculopathy Sacral | Radiculopathy Multiple SitesUnited States
-
Spaulding Rehabilitation HospitalTerminatedSpinal Cord InjuryUnited States
-
Spaulding Rehabilitation HospitalCompleted
-
University of CincinnatiCompletedPost-stroke DepressionUnited States
-
Suez Canal UniversityUnknownCarpal Tunnel SyndromeEgypt