Factors Determining the Prognosis in NSCLC Stage IV (LUPROG)

March 10, 2020 updated by: Ana Paula de Souza Borges, Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo

Predictive Prognostic Factors in Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IV

This study is a cohort study with patients with advanced NSCLC. Patients will answer questionnaires about symptoms and quality of life and will be submitted to physical and blood tests, and computer tomography. The aim of this study is to estimate prognostic factors predicting survival to 3 months in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is currently the neoplasm leading in deaths worldwide and in Brazil. NSCLC has a high incidence, is usually diagnosed in advanced stages and has poor survival rates. The ability to refine the prognosis of a disease has implications at the time of diagnosis and decision about treatment. Clinical and laboratory factors are studied to evaluated the prognosis of diseases. Palliative Prognostic Score (PaP score), Karnofsky Performance Status Scale (KPS), Palliative Prognostic Index (PPI) are applied in patients with many types of solid tumors. The Charlson Score evaluates comorbidities and the attributed risk for presence it. Others predictors of prognostic are cachexia, quality of life, inflammatory factors, sarcopenia. There is a need to improve the ability to estimate the prognosis and to identify the factors responsible to low survival rates in patients with NSCLC diagnosed at advanced stage, also as a tool for a better treatment selection.

This is an observational and prospective study, including patients diagnosed with NSCLC and admitted in ICESP, staged as IV at admission, with no previous systemic treatment and classified as ECOG 2-4. Demographic data, presence of a caregiver, anthropometry, MRC dyspnea scale, KPS, Edmont Symptom Scale, Charlson's Comorbidity Score, PPI and PaP were evaluated in each patient. Evaluation of sarcopenia and cachexia with abdominal CT (Slice-O-Matic, v.5), arm circumference, handgrip strength test and quality of life using EORTC score QLQ C-30 and QLQ-CAX-24 were also evaluated. Significant prognostic factors will be selected by multivariate analysis in a training set estimated as 217 patients.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

217

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • São Paulo, Brazil, 04513100
        • Recruiting
        • Ana Paula de Souza Borges
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

NSCLC patient, treatment naive with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance status 2-4 (ECOG PS).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Advanced stage IVa or IVb NSCLC patients histologically diagnosis.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance status 2 - 4
  • Treatment-naive

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Initiate treatment before initiate
  • psychiatric illnesses, except depression
  • pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • two concomitant neoplasms

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
overall survival
Time Frame: 3 months
to assess overall survival in patients with NSCLC
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NP1105/17

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on NSCLC Stage IV

Subscribe