Assessment of Covid-19 Infection Rates in Healthcare Workers Using a Desynchronization Strategy (Covid-19)

November 29, 2023 updated by: Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

Desynchronization of infection rates in healthcare workers will potentially reduce the early infection rates and therefore maintain workforce for late time points of the epidemic. Given the current threat of the COVID-19 epidemic, the department for Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Bern University Hospital, has decided to limit its elective interventions to oncological and life-saving procedures only. At the same time, the medical team were split in two teams, each working for 7 days, followed by 7 days off, called a desynchronization strategy. Contacts between the two teams are avoided.

The main aim of present study is to determine, if the infection rate between the two populations (at work versus at home) is different. Secondary aims are to determine if the workforce can be maintained for longer periods compared standard of care, and if the infection rate among patients hospitalized for other reasons varies compared to the community.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spreads rapidly and causes a pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19, the disease caused by SARS-CoV-2). Protecting and supporting caregivers is essential to maintain the workforce in the hospital to treat patients.

The use of recommended barrier precautions such as masks, gloves and gowns is of highest priority in the care of all patients with respiratory symptoms. However, given the long incubation period of 5 days there will be undiagnosed but infected patients with clinically mild cases, atypical presentations or even no symptoms at all. Thus, healthcare workers are on the one side at risk to get infected by asymptomatic patients and on the other side are critically needed for later phases of the epidemic, when the resources will in all likelihood be scarce or depleted.

One potential strategy to maintain workforce throughout an epidemic is to reduce the workforce in the early phases. Reducing workforce at early phases might potentially reduce in-hospital infection of the caregivers and reduces early burnout. One way of reducing the active workforce is to postpone all elective and non-urgent medical interventions to later phases of the epidemic.

Desynchronization of infection rates in healthcare workers will potentially reduce the early infection rates and therefore maintain workforce for late time points of the epidemic. Given the current threat of the COVID-19 epidemic, the department for Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Bern University Hospital, has decided to limit its elective interventions to oncological and life-saving procedures only. At the same time, the medical team were split in two teams, each working for 7 days followed by 7 days off, called a desynchronization strategy. Contacts between the two teams are avoided. This new regulation took effect on March 16th 2020.

Currently available resources to perform tests for SARS-CoV-2 infection are limited for the clinical routine and are therefore not available for research purposes. Thus, in the context of a clinical study the investigators aim to perform additional testing of SARS-CoV-2 of healthcare workers and patients in order to determine the clinical consequences of such desynchronization strategy, firstly within the current epidemic and secondly for future outbreaks.

The main aim of present study is to determine if the infection rate between the two populations (at work versus at home) is different. Secondary aims are to determine if the workforce can be maintained for longer periods compared standard of care, and if the infection rate among patients hospitalized for other reasons varies compared to the community.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

519

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Health care workers and patients of the Department for Visceral Surgery and Medicine

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthcare workers of the Department for Visceral Surgery and Medicine
  • Patients of the Department for Visceral Surgery and Medicine
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No informed consent
  • Patients with known COVID-19 infection before hospitalization in the investigators' department

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Healthcare workers providing healthcare
To determine the infection rate of healthcare workers providing healthcare versus those who are staying at home, in a desynchronization work strategy
Healthcare workers staying at home
To determine the infection rate of healthcare workers providing healthcare versus those who are staying at home, in a desynchronization work strategy
Hospitalized patients
To compare the infection rate of hospitalized patients versus healthcare workers

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fraction of healthcare workers infected with SARS-CoV-2
Time Frame: 90 days
To determine the infection rate of healthcare workers providing healthcare versus those who are staying at home, in a desynchronization work strategy
90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fraction of healthcare workers with COVID-19
Time Frame: 90 days
To compare the infection rate of hospitalized patients versus healthcare workers
90 days
Number of patients infected in the hospital
Time Frame: 90 days
Tracing origins of infection in healthcare workers to distinguish between community versus hospital acquired.
90 days
Development of SARS-CoV2 specific antibody repertoire
Time Frame: 18 months
To determine the T and B cell specific antibody repertoire in the course of a COVID-19 infection.
18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Guido Beldi, Prof. Dr., Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 19, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 29, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on SARS-CoV-2

3
Subscribe