A Novel Carbohydrate Counting Smartphone App for Youth With Type 1 Diabetes

April 16, 2020 updated by: Mark Palmert, The Hospital for Sick Children

iSpy: A Pilot Randomized Control Trial of a Novel Carbohydrate Counting Smartphone App for Youth With Type 1 Diabetes

Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) is a common chronic disease of childhood. T1DM has substantial impact on quality of life (QOL), including burdensome dietary restrictions and the need to count carbohydrates in foods to safely dose insulin. Carbohydrate counting is challenging, inconvenient, and, if done wrong, can cause high or low blood glucose levels.

To address these challenges, iSpy, a novel smartphone application, was created to identify foods and determine their carbohydrate content using pictures or speech. This pilot study is to evaluate if using iSpy improves carbohydrate counting accuracy and efficiency. Pilot participants will have carbohydrate counting (accuracy and efficiency) and their overall QoL (with respect to carbohydrate counting) assessed at baseline and after 3-months.

The investigators hypothesize that using iSpy will make carbohydrate counting easier (by improving accuracy and efficiency) and enhance QoL for patients and/or their caregivers. If so, iSpy may help lessen the burden of living with T1DM.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Nutrition is an integral component of management of many chronic diseases and of overall wellness. Helping individuals to understand what they are eating can empower them to better manage their diseases. For example, the growing number of youth living with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) struggle with carbohydrate counting, an essential and daily aspect of their lives, because of required reliance on memorization and numeracy skills. Effective carbohydrate counting has been demonstrated to improve blood glucose control, while inaccurate carbohydrate counting results in more variable blood glucose. Concerns related to carbohydrate counting accuracy can also limit food choices, provoke anxiety, and decrease quality of life. Since there is no cure for T1DM, enhancing patients' ability to understand and apply carbohydrate counting is an important part in helping them manage their condition most effectively.

iSpy is a novel healthcare application that addresses an important clinical need by facilitating carbohydrate counting using pictures or voice recognition. Proprietary algorithms adjust for portion size and identify hidden carbohydrates (such as in ketchup or other condiments) and quantify the amount of carbohydrates in a meal.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

46

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1X8
        • The Hospital for Sick Children

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with T1DM for ≥6 months;
  • Completion of initial carbohydrate counting classes;
  • Incorporating carbohydrate counting into treatment regimen;
  • Having access to a smart phone and data plan;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive impairments or co-morbid physical or psychiatric condition (e.g. blindness, clinical depression, anxiety disorder) that might impact ability to use iSpy;
  • Diagnosis of condition that affects dietary exposure (e.g. celiac disease);
  • Participation in usability study;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: iSpy
In addition to usual care, participants in the intervention group will receive the iSpy intervention.
iSpy is a novel healthcare application that hopes to address an important clinical need by facilitating carbohydrate counting using pictures or voice recognition. Proprietary algorithms adjust for portion size and identify hidden carbohydrates (such as in ketchup or other condiments) and quantify the amount of carbohydrates in a meal.
No Intervention: Control
The control group participants will continue to use their usual method of carbohydrate counting for a 3-month period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Carbohydrate (CHO) Counting Accuracy
Time Frame: 3 months

Assessing CHO counting using 10 food items from all major food groups. For each group, a simple food (e.g. an apple) and complex food (e.g. food with 2+ components but base food from targeted group) is included. A Co-investigator, Registered Dietitian (RD)/Certified Diabetes Educator (CDE), selected 2 sets of 10 food items for the study visits (verified that both sets were similar difficulty).

The net CHO value (true value) for each food will be based on the nutrition label, USDA Nutrient Database (Release 28), Canadian Nutrient File, or by RD/CDE.

For each food, data will be obtained from all participants:

• Estimated net CHO (in grams)

And with the above data, the following will be calculated:

  • % of food for which subjects estimated the CHO content within (+/-) 10 grams of true value.
  • Change (%) in the above accuracy measure for counting at baseline versus 3-month follow-up visit in iSpy vs control groups.
3 months
Carbohydrate (CHO) Counting Efficiency (Time to count)
Time Frame: 3 months

Assessing CHO counting using 10 food items from all major food groups. For each group, a simple food (e.g. an apple) and complex food (e.g. food with 2+ components but base food from targeted group) is included. A Co-investigator, Registered Dietitian (RD)/Certified Diabetes Educator (CDE), selected 2 sets of 10 food items for the study visits (verified that both sets were similar difficulty).

The net CHO value (true value) for each food will be based on the nutrition label, USDA Nutrient Database (Release 28), Canadian Nutrient File, or by RD/CDE.

For each food, data will be obtained from all participants:

• Time required to estimate net CHO (in seconds)

In order to calculate the following:

• Change in the above time taken for counting at baseline versus 3-month follow-up visit in iSpy vs control groups.

3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Quality of Life: Self Care Inventory Questionnaire
Time Frame: 3 months

Quality of Life questionnaires will be analyzed for any change from baseline to 3-month follow-up within both the intervention and control groups.

The first questionnaire including:

• Self Care Inventory: Scale from 1 (Never do it) to 5 (Always do this as recommended without fail);

3 months
Change in Quality of Life: Diabetes Questionnaire
Time Frame: 3 months

Quality of Life questionnaires will be analyzed for any change from baseline to 3-month follow-up within both the intervention and control groups.

The second questionnaire including:

• Diabetes Family Responsibility Questionnaire: Selection of 1 of 3 statements best describing the way each task is handled in the family from 1 (Parent taking responsibility almost all of the time) 2 (Parent and Child sharing responsibility equally) to 3 (Child taking responsibility almost all of the time);

3 months
Change in Quality of Life: Quality of Life for Youth
Time Frame: 3 months

Quality of Life questionnaires will be analyzed for any change from baseline to 3-month follow-up within both the intervention and control groups.

The third questionnaire including:

• Quality of Life for Youth: Scale from 0 (Never) to 4 (All the time);

3 months
Change in Quality of Life: Global Quality of Life
Time Frame: 3 months

Quality of Life questionnaires will be analyzed for any change from baseline to 3-month follow-up within both the intervention and control groups.

The last questionnaire including:

• Global Quality of Life: Scale from 1 (No Change) to 7 (A great deal better);

3 months
Implementation outcomes: Accrual/Attrition Rates
Time Frame: 3 months
• Criteria for implementation success will be based on the studies previously conducted by Co-Principal Investigator (JS): Participant accrual (total completed / total enrolled) and attrition rates (total dropouts / total enrolled). Success being defined as accrual rates >70% and attrition rates <15%;
3 months
Implementation outcomes: Engagement
Time Frame: 3 months

• Levels of engagement will be assessed as follows:

  • Low: defined as less than 1 logged meal every 2 weeks
  • High: defined as greater than 1 logged meal every 2 weeks.
3 months
Implementation outcomes: Acceptability
Time Frame: 3 months
• Acceptability: 7 item Acceptability e-Scale (AES) regarding level of acceptability from a scale of 1 (low) to 5 (high) of iSpy, with high acceptability being item mean score of 4 on AES. 2 additional qualitative items are included in AES and will be evaluated.
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mark Palmert, The Hospital for Sick Children

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 12, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 27, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

January 27, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 10, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 21, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 21, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

3
Subscribe