Injection Therapy in Patients With Lateral Epicondylitis

May 18, 2020 updated by: Zilan Bazancir Apaydın, Hacettepe University

Injection Therapy in Patients With Lateral Epicondylitis: Hyaluronic Acid or Prolotherapy?

Lateral epicondylitis is a painful enthesopathy of the common extensor tendon at the lateral part of the elbow, with a prevalence of 1-3 % in the general population. In the treatment of lateral epicondylitis, the role of biological-based therapies has begun to investigate regeneration and optimize tendon healing. Prolotherapy (PrT) and hyaluronic acid (HA) injections are biological based treatments. Previous studies have shown benefit of PrT in the treatment of tendinopathies. Preliminary findings demonstrated that HA could be clinically effective in the treatment of enthesopathies. Considering the paucity of HA studies (which also lack a control group) and the proposed mechanism of action of both PrT and HA is through cell proliferation and the healing process of tendons, this study was conducted to compare the effect of PrT and HA in chronic lateral epicondylitis .

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Lateral epicondylitis and other chronic tendinopathies are now understood to be non-inflammatory conditions characterized by collagen degeneration, fibroblast proliferation, mucoid degeneration and neovascularization Biological-based treatments can trigger the release of cytokines and growth factors from platelets, leukocytes, macrophages and other inflammatory cells. These growth factors support neovascularization and the chemotaxis of fibroblasts and tenocytes. It stimulates proliferation and collagen remodeling of fibroblasts and tenocytes.

PrT involves multiple injections of a small amount of irritant or sclerosing solution. Common irritants include hypertonic dextrose, phenol-glycerin-glucose and sodium morrhuate. PrT injection mechanism is as follows; while hypertonic dextrose causes cell rupture through osmosis, monosodium morrhuate attracts inflammatory mediators and improves blood flow of the diseased tendon.Previous studies have shown benefit of PrT in the treatment of tendinopathies HA injection is a treatment method that increases the ability of sliding with its viscoelastic properties, reduces tendon surface friction and accelerates regeneration. In vitro models suggest that HA can increase collagen I production and accumulation with a dose-dependent positive collagen I / collagen III ratio. However, controlled randomised studies are still needed.

Mechanism of action of both PrT and HA is cell proliferation and the healing process of tendons, this study was conducted to compare the effect of PrT and HA in chronic lateral epicondylitis .

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey, 06560
        • Hakan Apaydın

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. aged 20-60 years,
  2. had a clinical diagnosis of lateral epicondylitis, defined as pain over the lateral humeral epicondyle of at least 6 months' duration,
  3. provoked by palpation and resisted wrist/middle finger extension or gripping,
  4. participants needed to score at least 30/100 on Visual analogue scale (VAS),
  5. be able to understand enough Turkish to complete the outcome questionnaire.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any treatment for their elbow pain by a health care practitioner within the preceding 6 months,
  2. Concomitant neck or other arm pain causing disability or requiring treatment within the last 6 months,
  3. Clinical evidence of other primary sources of lateral elbow pain,
  4. Upper limb fractures within the preceding 10 years,
  5. Prior elbow surgery
  6. Elbow steroid injection in the past 3 months
  7. Systemic inflammatory disorder or malignancy,
  8. Pregnancy or breastfeeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Hyaluronic acid injection group
This is the study group in whom Hyaluronic acid injection was injected at lateral epicondylitis site.
Patients were infiltrated with injection single dose 30 mg/2 ml 1500 kilodalton high molecular weight hyaluronic acid at the lateral epicondyle according to the standard technique.
Other Names:
  • Prostrolane
Active Comparator: Prolotherapy injection group
This is the control group in whom prolotherapy injection was given at lateral epicondyle site.
Patients were infiltrated with 5cc of dextrose 15% at the lateral epicondyle according to the standard technique. For solution, 1 cc 2% lidocaine, 5 cc 30% hypertonic dextrose and 4 cc 0.9 % isotonic were used.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain via Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 week, 12 week

Change from baseline at 6 week and at 12 week

Pain of the participants will be assessed by most widely used and accepted "visual analogue scale". It consists of a 10 centimeter line marked at one end with "no pain" and at other end with "worst pain ever". Participant is asked to indicate where on the line he or she rates the pain on the day of presentation, baseline, 6 and 12 weeks of follow-ups. Numerical score is given to it simply by measuring length between "no pain" to patients mark.

Baseline, 6 week, 12 week
Quick - Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 week, 12 week

Change from baseline at 6 week and at 12 week

The elbow disability scale was assessed using the Quick DASH (disability of arm, shoulder & hand) questionnaire containing 11 questions with five choices for each question. The final score can range between 0 (best condition) and 100 (worst condition). Participant is asked to answer the Quick DASH at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks of follow-ups

Baseline, 6 week, 12 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Grip strength via dynamometer
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 week, 12 week

Change from baseline at 6 week and at 12 week

Pain-free grip strength is a commonly used objective measure of lateral epicondilitis-related disability with high reliability and validity. In the study, we used a hand dynamometer (Baseline® Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer 200 LB Standard). Patients were asked to sit, adduct the shoulder, flex the elbow to 90 degrees and put their forearm in a neutral position, then squeeze the dynamometer for three to five seconds. This test was conducted three times with 60-second intervals for each patient, and the mean patient grip strength was recorded at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks of follow-ups.

Baseline, 6 week, 12 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Zuhal Altay, MD, Inonu University Faculy of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 2, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

September 25, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 11, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

All collected IPD, all IPD that underlie results in a publication

IPD Sharing Time Frame

starting 12 months after publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access criteria IPD and additional supporting information will share, analysis of primer and sekonder outcomes and clinical data will share after publication,

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lateral Epicondylitis

Clinical Trials on Hyaluronic Acid

3
Subscribe