- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04436523
Blood Flow Restriction After Meniscus Repair
Outcomes of Blood Flow Restriction Training in Post-operative Rehabilitation After Meniscus Repair Surgery
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The investigators will conduct a double-blinded, single-institution, randomized controlled trial to compare patients undergoing arthroscopic meniscus repair with post-operative rehabilitation protocol as (1) a standard-of-care rehabilitative protocol with a non-occlusive blood pressure cuff (inflated to 20-30 mm Hg) applied to the operative extremity versus (2) blood flow restriction training with cuff occlusion applied to the operative extremity. Patients will be enrolled prospectively and pre-operatively at their initial clinic visit after meniscus injury.
Rehabilitative exercises would be advanced per the physical therapists' discretion with similar exercises for patients in both groups for direct comparison. These exercises are part of an already-established post-operative protocol that is in place, with the only difference being the addition of the blood flow restriction protocol in the intervention group. All patients would undergo their supervised post-operative rehabilitation at our institution.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
San Francisco, California, United States, 94158
- University of California, San Francisco
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants who undergo surgery for arthroscopic meniscus repair
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants undergoing surgery for concomitant ligamentous surgeries
- Patients with Diabetes Mellitus, vascular disease, or infections of the involved extremity
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Blood flow restriction
The blood flow restriction arm will include the use of the pneumatic tourniquet applied to the operative lower extremity throughout post-operative rehabilitation sessions.
The tourniquet pressure will be titrated to 80% of the measured extremity arterial limb occlusion pressure with the participant lying supine.
|
The Delfi Personalized Tourniquet System will be utilized to apply the blood flow restriction protocol.
Other Names:
Post-operative physical therapy as guided by a standardized protocol for patients undergoing meniscus repair.
|
|
Sham Comparator: Standard rehabilitation
The standard rehabilitation arm will undergo the same rehabilitation protocol as the experimental arm.
A tourniquet will still be applied, but will only be inflated to 20 mmHg, a pressure that will not occlude blood flow.
|
Post-operative physical therapy as guided by a standardized protocol for patients undergoing meniscus repair.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Knee Extension Force at Week 1
Time Frame: Week 1 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
Peak knee extension force (lbs) evaluated with a hand-held dynamometer
|
Week 1 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
|
Knee Extension Force at Week 2
Time Frame: Week 2 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
Peak knee extension force (lbs) evaluated with a hand-held dynamometer
|
Week 2 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
|
Knee Extension Force at Week 3
Time Frame: Week 3 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
Peak knee extension force (lbs) evaluated with a hand-held dynamometer
|
Week 3 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
|
Knee Extension Force at Week 4
Time Frame: Week 4 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
Peak knee extension force (lbs) evaluated with a hand-held dynamometer
|
Week 4 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
|
Knee Extension Force at Week 5
Time Frame: Week 5 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
Peak knee extension force (lbs) evaluated with a hand-held dynamometer
|
Week 5 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
|
Knee Extension Force at Week 6
Time Frame: Week 6 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
Peak knee extension force (lbs) evaluated with a hand-held dynamometer
|
Week 6 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
|
Knee Extension Force at Week 7
Time Frame: Week 7 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
Peak knee extension force (lbs) evaluated with a hand-held dynamometer
|
Week 7 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
|
Knee Extension Force at Week 8
Time Frame: Week 8 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
Peak knee extension force (lbs) evaluated with a hand-held dynamometer
|
Week 8 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
|
Knee Extension Force at Week 9
Time Frame: Week 9 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
Peak knee extension force (lbs) evaluated with a hand-held dynamometer
|
Week 9 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
|
Knee Extension Force at Week 10
Time Frame: Week 10 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
Peak knee extension force (lbs) evaluated with a hand-held dynamometer
|
Week 10 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
|
Knee Extension Force at Week 11
Time Frame: Week 11 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
Peak knee extension force (lbs) evaluated with a hand-held dynamometer
|
Week 11 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
|
Knee Extension Force at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
Peak knee extension force (lbs) evaluated with a hand-held dynamometer
|
Week 12 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
|
Thigh Circumference at Week 1
Time Frame: Week 1 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
Measurement of thigh circumference (centimeters) will be performed utilizing tape measures at specified distances along the thigh
|
Week 1 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
|
Thigh Circumference at Week 2
Time Frame: Week 2 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
Measurement of thigh circumference (centimeters) will be performed utilizing tape measures at specified distances along the thigh
|
Week 2 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
|
Thigh Circumference at Week 3
Time Frame: Week 3 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
Measurement of thigh circumference (centimeters) will be performed utilizing tape measures at specified distances along the thigh
|
Week 3 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
|
Thigh Circumference at Week 4
Time Frame: Week 4 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
Measurement of thigh circumference (centimeters) will be performed utilizing tape measures at specified distances along the thigh
|
Week 4 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
|
Thigh Circumference at Week 5
Time Frame: Week 5 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
Measurement of thigh circumference (centimeters) will be performed utilizing tape measures at specified distances along the thigh
|
Week 5 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
|
Thigh Circumference at Week 6
Time Frame: Week 6 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
Measurement of thigh circumference (centimeters) will be performed utilizing tape measures at specified distances along the thigh
|
Week 6 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
|
Thigh Circumference at Week 7
Time Frame: Week 7 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
Measurement of thigh circumference (centimeters) will be performed utilizing tape measures at specified distances along the thigh
|
Week 7 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
|
Thigh Circumference at Week 8
Time Frame: Week 8 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
Measurement of thigh circumference (centimeters) will be performed utilizing tape measures at specified distances along the thigh
|
Week 8 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
|
Thigh Circumference at Week 9
Time Frame: Week 9 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
Measurement of thigh circumference (centimeters) will be performed utilizing tape measures at specified distances along the thigh
|
Week 9 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
|
Thigh Circumference at Week 10
Time Frame: Week 10 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
Measurement of thigh circumference (centimeters) will be performed utilizing tape measures at specified distances along the thigh
|
Week 10 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
|
Thigh Circumference at Week 11
Time Frame: Week 11 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
Measurement of thigh circumference (centimeters) will be performed utilizing tape measures at specified distances along the thigh
|
Week 11 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
|
Thigh Circumference at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
Measurement of thigh circumference (centimeters) will be performed utilizing tape measures at specified distances along the thigh
|
Week 12 (Evaluated weekly at physical therapy visits from 0-12 weeks)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score at Week 6
Time Frame: 6 weeks (measured at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-operatively)
|
Patient-reported outcome measure (numerical score) from survey.
Min: 0 = lowest level of function/highest level of symptoms.
Max: 100 = highest level of function/lowest level of symptoms
|
6 weeks (measured at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-operatively)
|
|
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score at Week 12
Time Frame: 3 months (measured at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-operatively)
|
Patient-reported outcome measure (numerical score) from survey.
Min: 0 = lowest level of function/highest level of symptoms.
Max: 100 = highest level of function/lowest level of symptoms
|
3 months (measured at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-operatively)
|
|
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score at Week 24
Time Frame: 6 months (measured at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-operatively)
|
Patient-reported outcome measure (numerical score) from survey.
Min: 0 = lowest level of function/highest level of symptoms.
Max: 100 = highest level of function/lowest level of symptoms
|
6 months (measured at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-operatively)
|
|
Y-balance Testing at Week 12
Time Frame: 3 months (performed at 3 months and 6 months post-operatively)
|
Functional outcome measure (numerical score).
The lower quarter Y-balance test evaluates dynamic stability and functional symmetry.
The subject stands on a single leg and reaches in three directions (anterior, posteromedial, posterolateral) and a composite score is calculated as a percentage: (sum of reach distances in centimeters in each direction) / (3*limb length) * 100.
|
3 months (performed at 3 months and 6 months post-operatively)
|
|
Y-balance Testing at Week 24
Time Frame: 6 months (performed at 3 months and 6 months post-operatively)
|
Functional outcome measure (numerical score).
The lower quarter Y-balance test evaluates dynamic stability and functional symmetry.
The subject stands on a single leg and reaches in three directions (anterior, posteromedial, posterolateral) and a composite score is calculated as a percentage: (sum of reach distances in centimeters in each direction) / (3*limb length) * 100.
|
6 months (performed at 3 months and 6 months post-operatively)
|
|
3-hop Test at Week 12
Time Frame: 3 months (performed at 3 months and 6 months post-operatively)
|
Functional outcome measure (numerical score).
The 3-hop test assesses dynamic stability and limb control.
The subject hops three times consecutively forward in a same line and at the final landing, pauses in position while a measurement is made from the starting line to the toe at the end of the final hop in centimeters.
The test is compared to the contralateral, uninjured limb, and scoring is reported as a percentage of the uninjured limb.
|
3 months (performed at 3 months and 6 months post-operatively)
|
|
3-hop Test at Week 24
Time Frame: 6 months (performed at 3 months and 6 months post-operatively)
|
Functional outcome measure (numerical score).
The 3-hop test assesses dynamic stability and limb control.
The subject hops three times consecutively forward in a same line and at the final landing, pauses in position while a measurement is made from the starting line to the toe at the end of the final hop in meters.
|
6 months (performed at 3 months and 6 months post-operatively)
|
|
Single Leg Squat Testing at Week 12
Time Frame: 3 months (performed at 3 months and 6 months post-operatively)
|
Functional outcome measure (numerical score).
Single leg squat testing evaluates core stability and ability to perform functional movement safely.
Subjects will be asked to perform a single leg squat and will be evaluated on 5 criteria, with one point for clinician-rated good performance in each (A) maintenance in balance, depth, speed (B) trunk posture (C) pelvic rotation & tilt (D) Hip adduction or femoral internal rotation (E) knee joint apparent valgus.
Min: 0 = poor balance and motor control; Max: 5 = good balance and motor control
|
3 months (performed at 3 months and 6 months post-operatively)
|
|
Single Leg Squat Testing at Week 24
Time Frame: 6 months (performed at 3 months and 6 months post-operatively)
|
Functional outcome measure (numerical score).
Single leg squat testing evaluates core stability and ability to perform functional movement safely.
Subjects will be asked to perform a single leg squat and will be evaluated on 5 criteria, with one point for clinician-rated good performance in each (A) maintenance in balance, depth, speed (B) trunk posture (C) pelvic rotation & tilt (D) Hip adduction or femoral internal rotation (E) knee joint apparent valgus.
Min: 0 = poor balance and motor control; Max: 5 = good balance and motor control
|
6 months (performed at 3 months and 6 months post-operatively)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sachin Allahabadi, MD, University of California, San Francisco
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 19-29641
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Meniscus Lesion
-
Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire VaudoisCompletedDoes Wrapping With Bone Marrow Injection Enhance Healing of Meniscal Sutures Into the Avascular AreaMeniscus LesionSwitzerland
-
Shenzhen People's HospitalWithdrawn
-
Hospices Civils de LyonCompleted
-
Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliCompleted
-
University Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceUnknown
-
State University of New York at BuffaloCompleted
-
Ankara UniversityCompletedMeniscus LesionTurkey
-
Northern Orthopaedic Division, DenmarkCompleted
-
Artromedical Konrad Malinowski ClinicRecruitingMeniscus; Degeneration | Meniscus Lesion | Meniscus Tear | Meniscus DisorderPoland
Clinical Trials on Blood flow restriction (Delfi Personalized Tourniquet System)
-
Steadman Philippon Research InstituteWithdrawn
-
Children's Healthcare of AtlantaRecruiting
-
The Methodist Hospital Research InstituteRecruiting
-
The Methodist Hospital Research InstituteRecruitingHealthy | Healthy Volunteers | Healthy Male and Female SubjectsUnited States
-
Massachusetts General HospitalActive, not recruitingAchilles Tendon Rupture | Achilles Tendon Repairs/Reconstructions | Blood Flow Restriction Therapy | Dynamic Blood Flow RestrictionUnited States
-
China Medical University HospitalRecruiting
-
NYU Langone HealthTerminatedPatellofemoral Pain SyndromeUnited States
-
Cleveland Clinic Akron GeneralCompletedLateral EpicondylitisUnited States
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamActive, not recruitingHip Fractures | Muscle AtrophyUnited States
-
Andrews Research & Education FoundationFloridaActive, not recruitingBlood Flow Restriction (BFR) Training EffectsUnited States