Comparative Study of Sharkskin Versus Grieshaber Forceps During ILM Peeling

July 2, 2020 updated by: MidAtlantic Retina, Wills Eye

The purpose of this study is to compare the performance and anatomic outcomes of the Sharkskin internal limiting membrane (ILM) forceps and the Grieshaber ILM forceps in macular surgery.

Peeling of the ILM is a difficult aspect of vitreoretinal surgery and often daunting task from a vitreoretinal fellow's perspective. The hypothesis is that the newer Sharkskin forceps have a larger platform and micro-abrasions along the forcep surface to increase grasping ability and potentially limit trauma to the retina surface compared to the Grieshaber forceps. This project may also serve as an education tool for fellows learning the basics of ILM peeling.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Macular pathology

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No prior vitreoretinal surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Sharkskin Arm
Use of Sharkskin ILM forceps
Placebo Comparator: Grieshaber Arm
Use of Grieshaber ILM forceps

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Surgical time
Time Frame: During surgery
During surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ease of peeling - surgeon
Time Frame: During surgery
Use of standardized questionnaire to the surgeon.
During surgery
Ease of peeling - masked grader
Time Frame: Through study completion, up to one year
Use of standardized questionnaire to the masked grader.
Through study completion, up to one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

July 6, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 7, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 7, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB #2020-91

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Epiretinal Membrane

3
Subscribe