Incidence of Short-term Urinary Retention After Fascial Retropubic Sling: Prospective and Randomized Analysis.

July 7, 2020 updated by: Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence of short-term urinary retention and the cure rate in patients with stress urinary incontinence undergoing surgical treatment with fascial pubovaginal sling with two tension adjustment techniques: the classic adjustment technique ("2 fingers") and measuring the distance between the fixation knot and the aponeurosis of 4 cm.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A randomized double-blind clinical trial will be conducted in women over 18 years of age with stress urinary incontinence and indication for surgical treatment, who have not undergone previous surgical treatment. Postoperative follow-up will be 1 month when the incidence of urinary retention and the rate of cure after the procedure will be evaluated. The incidence of urinary retention in 1 month postoperatively will be evaluated in the two different techniques (post-voiding residue > 200ml or the need for intermittent bladder catheterization) and the cure rate for urinary incontinence (cough test and response "No" to the question 3 of the Urogenital Distress Inventory questionnaire).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

56

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • RS
      • Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, 90035-903
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years old and no improvement with conservative management

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior anti incontinence surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Sling tension adjustment by classic technique
We will adjust the tension of the sling by using the classic technique (2 fingers between the fascia and the knot)
We will adjust the tension of the sling by using the classic technique (2 fingers between the fascia and the knot)
Active Comparator: Sling tension adjustment by height of 4 cm
We will adjust the tension of the sling by using the height between the fascia and the knot of 4cm
We will adjust the tension of the sling by using the height between the fascia and the knot of 4cm

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate the incidence of urinary retention in short-term after fascial pubovaginal sling
Time Frame: 1 month
Urinary retention will be considered the need for bladder catheterization or post-voiding residue> 200ml after 1 month), in patients with tension adjustment by the classic technique x node height to the abdominal rectus fascia of 4cm.
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate the incidence of curing stress urinary incontinence in short-term after fascial pubovaginal sling in both groups.
Time Frame: 1 month
Cure will be considered the answer "NO" to the 3rd question of Urogenital Distress Inventory and a negative cough test.
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tiago Rosito, Doctor, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 10, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 30, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 7, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress Urinary Incontinence

Subscribe