Ultrafast Ultrasound Imaging Assesment of Carotid Plaque Neovascularization (ULTRA-VASC)

November 15, 2021 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Innovative Applications of Ultrafast Ultrasound Imaging in Peripheral Vascular Pathology: Evaluation of Carotid Plaque Vulnerability by Quantification of Neovascularization

Stroke is the second leading cause of death in the Western world and the leading cause of major lifelong disability. About 15% of strokes are secondary to thrombosis or embolization of an unstable atheromatous carotid plaque. In these symptomatic patients, the degree of carotid stenosis is correlated with the risk of early recurrence. Patients with stenosis over 70% are therefore offered an endarterectomy, an operation to remove carotid plaque, to prevent future strokes[1]. In asymptomatic patients, the degree of stenosis is a limited predictor, and better risk stratification is required to assess the degree of plaque vulnerability and stroke risk of the patient. The therapeutic decision towards endarterectomy in addition to drug therapy is debated because of a variable and dependent benefit/risk balance for each patient. A number of imaging parameters have been studied: ulceration, heterogeneity, vascularization of the plaque for example, but their place is not well defined [2].

The usual evaluation of carotid stenosis is by conventional Doppler ultrasound with calculation of the degree of stenosis according to the NASCET criteria.

For symptomatic stenoses the intervention is recommended when above 70% and is discussed from 50% to 70% of NASCET stenosis degree.

For asymptomatic stenoses, the procedure is discussed when above 60% taking into account the patient's life expectancy, the risk of the surgery and the unstable nature of the plaque [2].

Destabilization of the carotid plaque is partially induced by inflammation associated with neo-vascularization. The detection of these new vessels by conventional contrast ultrasound has already shown a distinction between stable and unstable plaques, by the presence or absence of microbubbles in the plaque. However, this assessment is not very precise and only the most vascularized plaques can be detected. Ultrafast ultrasound Imaging is a new ultrasonic Imaging modality that allows detecting low speed flows, a tiny vascular structure within the vessel wall.

RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS Plaques neo-vascularization would be more precisely detected and characterized by ultrafast imaging coupled with microbubble injection than conventional ultrasound imaging.

A better assessment of plaque instability could improve the selection of patients for carotid endarterectomy and increase the benefit/risk ratio of this preventive surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

see above

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75015
        • Recruiting
        • Hopital Europeen Georges-Pompidou
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Tristan MIRAULT, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Lina KHIDER, MD, MSc
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Guillaume GOUDOT, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Emmanuel MESSAS, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient is over 18
  • The patient is scheduled for carotid endarterectomy within 30 days at most
  • The patient has a social security system

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-atheromatous carotid stenosis (radiation)
  • Contraindication of the use of SonoVue ultrasound contrast media. Hypersensitivity to the active ingredient or any of the following excipients: Macrogol 4000; Distearoylphosphatidylcholine; Dipalmitoylphosphatidylglycerol sodium; Palmitic acid.
  • The patient has any of the following conditions: right-left shunt, severe pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary blood pressure > 90 mm Hg), uncontrolled systemic hypertension and respiratory distress syndrome.
  • Lack of social security coverage, patient under justice
  • Allergy to ultrasound gel
  • Pregnancy. (As a precautionary measure, it is best to avoid using SonoVue during pregnancy according to SPC)
  • Patient under guardianship or curatorship or under the protection of justice.
  • Patient unable or unwilling to give written consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Carotid plaque or stenosis ultrasound enhanced UF assesment
symptomatic or asymptomatic patients with atheromatous carotid stenosis scheduled for carotid endarterectomy

Ultrasound contrast medium: SonoVue 8µL/mL (Bracco International BV) Ultrasound scanner: Aixplorer® device marketed by SuperSonic Imagine©, CE Doppler UltraFast™Doppler, contrast ultrasound (CEUS), color Doppler and ultra-sensitive energy Doppler, high-performance directional energy Doppler, Elastography ShearWave™ UF-Doppler (UltraFast-Doppler) and microbubble injection (SonoVue) Apparatus for performing the UF Doppler sequence: Aixplorer, manufacturer : Supersonic Imagine, Aix-en-Provence, France, CE Marking.

3D RCA dedicated vascular probe with dedicated Doppler sequences

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neovascularization of the carotid plaque
Time Frame: end of inclusions
Correlation BETWEEN the average signal strength of the carotid plaque analyzed after injection of ultrasound contrast medium by three-dimensional probe with UF-Doppler AND the number of neovessels determined by histological analysis of the carotid plaque (number of neovessels per section) studied.
end of inclusions

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Plaque stable or unstable
Time Frame: end of inclusions
analyzed after injection of ultrasound contrast medium by three-dimensional probe with UF-Doppler AND the plaque stability according to Oxford criteria
end of inclusions
Plaque symptomatic or not
Time Frame: end of inclusions
Comparison BETWEEN the average signal strength of the carotid plaque analyzed after injection of ultrasound contrast medium by three-dimensional probe with UF-Doppler AND the symptomatic or asymptomatic status for stroke of the patient
end of inclusions

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tristan MIRAULT, MD, PhD, Hopital Europeen Georges-Pompidou

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 17, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 17, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 17, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 14, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 16, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) that underlie results in publication could be shared

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data could be available one year after the last publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data sharing must be accepted by the sponsor and the PI based on scientific project and scientific involvement of the PI team.

Teams wishing obtain IPD must meet the sponsor and IP team to present scientifics (and potentially commercial) purpose, IPD needed, format of data transmission, and timeframe. Technical feasibility and financial support will be discussed before mandatory contractualization.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carotid Artery Plaque

Clinical Trials on contrast enhanced ultrafast ultrasound imaging

3
Subscribe