Comparison Between the Old Diagnostic Tools for Paediatric Undernutrition and the HAS Recommendations (EDEN)

December 28, 2020 updated by: University Hospital, Montpellier

Comparison Between the Old Diagnostic Tools for Paediatric Undernutrition and the New HAS 2019 Recommendations

Undernutrition is a widely under-diagnosed public health problem, including in pediatrics department. Undernutrition prevalence in pediatrics departments is about 15 to 20%.

Until now, there has been no national consensus on the criteria to be used to diagnose paediatric undernutrition. Until now, assessment focused on a range of non-consensus arguments that allowed the health care team to make its diagnosis. So, in the absence of well-defined criteria, diagnosis was based in part on experience and assesment team.

Since November 2019, the French High Authority of Health (Haute Authorité de Santé - HAS) has suggested recommendations to standardize pediatric undernutrition diagnosis.

The investigators offer to evaluate undernutrition prevalence differences diagnosed according to new HAS criteria compared to the previous diagnostic methodology.

The investigator's secondary aim is to identify profiles of children who do match between the two diagnostics methods.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The investigators will conduct a prospective cohort without change in care.

Following classic patient admission in involved departments, the investigating team moves to the department to collect data.

The measurements and informations collected are no different from those taken in the context of normal care.

All anthropometric measurements correspond to recommendations of good practice. Anthropometric measurements will be carried out by the healthcare team.

With collected data the investigators will evaluate undernutrition for each child, according to the 2 diagnostics methods.

For any diagnosis of undernutrition, the department dietician will be alerted so that the patient can be taken care of so it is done normally.

Data collected are as follows:

Simple demographic characteristics: Age, sex, departmentsand principal diagnosis Anthropometry: weight, height, brachial perimeter, head circumference Birth weight and date of term of pregnancy. Clinical history: all pathologies or clinical events that may be related to a weight variation.

Assessment of ingesta. A non-opposition will be asked

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Montpellier, France, 34295
        • Uhmontpellier

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 second to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Children under 18 admitted for hospitalization in the pediatric deparment of the Montpellier University Hospital

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Patient under 18 years old (HAS 2019)
  • Patient admitted to short and long-stay pediatric services at Montpellier University Hospital, other than maternity, neonatal, palliative care or resuscitation and rehabilitation department.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Parental or child opposition
  • Legal guardian unable to express consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison between HAS 2019 undernutrition criteria and previous diagnostic methodology
Time Frame: 2 month
Comparison between HAS 2019 undernutrition criteria and previous diagnostic methodology
2 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Identified profiles of children who do match between the two diagnostics methods
Time Frame: 2 month
Identified profiles of children who do match between the two diagnostics methods
2 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Antoine AVIGNON, PR, University Hospital, Montpellier

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 17, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 22, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 29, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 28, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RECHMPL20_0391

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

NC

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Undernutrition

Subscribe