Enhancing Physical Function in the Long-term for Older Adults

June 9, 2025 updated by: Duke University

A Novel Telehealth Intervention Using Nutrition and Exercise to Extend Intervention Benefits: Enhancing Physical Function in the Long-term for Obese Older Adults

The intervention being studied is a 12-week nutrition and physical activity intervention, delivered using videoconference technology by registered dietitian clinicians to maintain weight loss and functional gains in older adults who successfully completed a weight loss intervention. The "Legacy Intervention" will include cognitive behavioral strategies (e.g., goal setting, self-monitoring, and social support), and draw upon a toolbox of e-approaches, including daily and weekly text reminders, virtual exercise classes, virtual individual and group nutrition classes, and step tracking device.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University, School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participated in a weight loss intervention in the last 9 months and lost ≥ 3% body weight and improved SPPB score by ≥ 1 point or 6MWT by ≥ 50 meters
  • Age ≥ 60
  • Able to speak and understand spoken and written English.
  • Able to record dietary intake and weight

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of unstable or symptomatic life-threatening illness
  • Neurological conditions causing functional impairment, including Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, and permanent disability due to stroke
  • Inability to complete physical function assessment
  • No access to internet connection to participate in the tele-intervention
  • Unable or unwilling to use provided tablet to participant in tele-intervention
  • History of cognitive impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Legacy Intervention
Older adults who have successfully completed a lifestyle intervention (lost at least 3% body weight and increased short physical performance battery (SPPB) score by 1 point or 6-minute walk test (6MWT) by 50 meters) will be enrolled in a tele-nutrition and tele-exercise intervention.
The Legacy intervention is a nutrition and exercise protocol delivered using video conference technology. The Legacy protocol incorporates behavioral strategies along with nutrition and exercise to maintain and extend functional benefits of obesity treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion Retention
Time Frame: 12 week endpoint
Proportion retention will be computed by dividing the number of retained subjects at the end of the intervention by the total number of participants
12 week endpoint
Acceptability as Measured by Participant Satisfaction
Time Frame: 12 week endpoint
Participants will asked to rate their satisfaction by answering the question "Overall, I'm glad I participated in this weight maintenance program" with the following possible responses: 1- strongly disagree , 2- disagree, 3 - neither agree nor disagree, 4- agree, and and 5 -strongly agree. Score ranges from 1- 5 with higher score indicating greater satisfaction
12 week endpoint

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Physical Performance as Measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks
Scores range from 0 to 12 with higher score indicating better performance.
0 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in Physical Function as Measured Using the 6 Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in distance walked in six minutes from baseline
0 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in Body Weight as Measured by the Aria Fitbit Scale
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks
Body weight in pounds.
0 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in Average Weekly Steps Measured Using Garmin Watch
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks
Average step counts using Garmin watch.
0 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in Total Calories Using 3-day Food Record (Participants Record Everything They Eat and Drink for Three Days)
Time Frame: 0 weeks,12 weeks
Average total calories consumed.
0 weeks,12 weeks
Change in Stress Using the Perceived Stress Scale
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks
Perceived Stress Scale is a 10-item stress assessment instrument. Individual scores on the PSS can range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress.
0 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in Self-reported Depression Using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks
Score ranges from 0-60 with higher scores indicating greater depression symptoms.
0 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in Mood Using the Profile of Mood States Questionnaire
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in mood from baseline, 6 and 12 weeks. Profile of Mood States is a psychological rating scale used to assess transient, distinct mood states that uses a five-point scale ranging from "not at all" to "extremely".
0 weeks, 12 weeks
Quality of Life Using the SF-36 Questionnaire - SF-36 Physical Functioning Scale
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks
Physical functioning scale of the SF-36 is a 10-items scale with a scores ranging from 0-100% where the higher score indicates greater physical functioning.
0 weeks, 12 weeks
Quality of Life Using the SF-36 Questionnaire - Role Limitations Due to Physical Health Scale
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks
Role limitations due to physical health scale of the SF-36 is a 4-items scale with a scores ranging from 0-100% where the higher score indicates less limitations due to physical health
0 weeks, 12 weeks
Quality of Life Using the SF-36 Questionnaire - Role Limitations Due to Emotional Problems Scale
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks
Role limitations due to emotional problems scale of the SF-36 is a 3-items scale with a scores ranging from 0-100% where the higher score indicates less limitations due to emotional health
0 weeks, 12 weeks
Quality of Life Using the SF-36 Questionnaire - Energy/Fatigue Scale
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks
Energy/fatigue scale of the SF-36 is a 4-items scale with a scores ranging from 0-100% where the higher score indicates less energy/fatigue
0 weeks, 12 weeks
Quality of Life Using the SF-36 Questionnaire - Emotional Well-Being Scale
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks
Emotional Well-Being scale of the SF-36 is a 5-items scale with a scores ranging from 0-100% where the higher score indicates greater emotional well-being
0 weeks, 12 weeks
Quality of Life Using the SF-36 Questionnaire - Social Functioning Scale
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks
Social Functioning scale of the SF-36 is a 2-items scale with a scores ranging from 0-100% where the higher score indicates greater social functioning.
0 weeks, 12 weeks
Quality of Life Using the SF-36 Questionnaire - Pain Scale
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks
Pain scale of the SF-36 is a 2-items scale with a scores ranging from 0-100% where the higher score indicates less pain.
0 weeks, 12 weeks
Quality of Life Using the SF-36 Questionnaire - General Health Scale
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks
General Health scale of the SF-36 is a 5-items scale with a scores ranging from 0-100% where the higher score indicates greater general health
0 weeks, 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kathryn Starr, PhD, Duke University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 26, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 16, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

September 16, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 24, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 29, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 26, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PRO00105630
  • 1P30AG064201-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Weight Loss Maintenance

Clinical Trials on Legacy Intervention

Subscribe