Heterogeneity of Critical Illness: a Cohort Study (HEALICS)

May 21, 2026 updated by: Frederik Keus, University Medical Center Groningen

Heterogeneity of Critical Illness: Exploring New Risk Factors for Severity of Disease in Intensive Care Patients. A Cohort Study

Rationale: There is large heterogeneity in disease states of critically ill patients at ICU admittance and there is also large heterogeneity in their disease severity during ICU stay. Still, some patients may show remarkable similarities in disease patterns. There is a lack of understanding of causal mechanisms that lead to divergent outcomes in critically ill patients, and at the same time different diseases may share common underlying, yet unidentified, causal pathways that could explain similarities between different diseases.

Objective: To explore the association between patient characteristics and the severity of organ failure in critically ill patients admitted to the ICU Study design: Prospective cohort study Study population: Adult critically ill patients in the ICU Intervention (if applicable): not applicable Main study parameters/endpoints: Maximum severity of organ failure observed during ICU stay measured by the maximum SOFA score and quality of life at one year follow-up

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: <All patients will undergo physical examination, including ultrasound evaluation upon ICU admission according to standard practice care. The burden will be a blood sample (and urine sample) at admission. Blood sample will be obtained by arterial line (or venous access) which is part of standard ICU care. So there will be no additional puncture for this study. Collection of variables during ICU stay will all be either part of standard clinical care or include extra physical examination or ultrasound evaluation. For follow-up patients will be evaluated by phone at 6 months and at 12 months by home-visit. This is also already part of the investigator's evaluation of quality of care. Except for blood sampling, all study related procedures have previously been approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). The patient will experience no individual benefit.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

5000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Provincie Groningen
      • Groningen, Provincie Groningen, Netherlands, 9713GZ
        • Recruiting
        • University Medical Center Groningen
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients acutely admitted to the ICU

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults Definition: age ≥18 years.
  • Emergency admission to the ICU Definition: patients who are acutely admitted to the ICU due to acute or unexpected critical illness, either from the emergency department or the ward or transferred from an ICU (or a ward) from another hospital.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Planned admission
  • Absence of an invasive arterial or venous line for blood sampling.
  • Any continued cardiopulmonary resuscitation efforts upon admission which limit access to the patient for research activities.
  • Main ICU admission reason chronic (non-invasive) home ventilation
  • Main ICU admission reason normothermic treatment after cardiac arrest
  • Main ICU admission reason ischemic stroke, intracerebral bleeding, or isolated neurotrauma
  • Main ICU admission reason Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
  • Solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplant during current hospital admission
  • Strict isolation due to any contagious disease
  • No informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Adult critically ill patients in the ICU
Acutely admitted to the ICU
Care as usual

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Severity of organ failure observed during ICU stay
Time Frame: During ICU admission with a maximum of 90 days
The primary prognostic outcome will be the maximum SOFA score during ICU stay. The daily maximum SOFA score will be considered up to a maximum of 90 days.
During ICU admission with a maximum of 90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Follow-up Quality of life data
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months after ICU discharge

Patients will be evaluated by questionnaires at 6 and 12 months follow-up.Follow-up data will include survival status and data on quality of life.

  • Patients psychological functioning will be evaluated using the Short Form 20 and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).
  • Patients physical functioning data will be measured by the KATZ ADL index and the Clinical Frailty Score. In addition, the Euro-Qol (EQ-5d) will be used.
  • Social functioning data will be collected using the General Functioning 6 scale (GF6) which is a subscale of the GF12 and is a quick and effective tool to assess the overall functioning of families. Data will be collected from both patients and family members. Return to work will only be evaluated at 12 months follow-up by 4 extra questions concerning the patients return to work.

In addition we will explore and validate extended modifications on the total and domain level of the organ failure assessment score (SOFA+).

6 and 12 months after ICU discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Frederik Keus, PhD, University Medical Center Groningen

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 27, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

On request

IPD Sharing Time Frame

In two years

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

On request

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critically Ill

Clinical Trials on Standard diagnosis test

Subscribe