Comparison Between Positive and Negative COVID-19 Pneumonia

May 17, 2022 updated by: Pasquale Mansueto, University of Palermo

Clinical, Laboratory and Imaging Comparison Between COVID-19 Pneumonia Confirmed by PCR Detection on Nasopharyngeal Swab and Negative Swab Pneumonia

In the late 2019 a new Coronavirus was identified as the cause of a group of atypical interstitial pneumonia cases in Wuhan, a city in the Chinese province of Hubei. In February 2020, the World Health Organization designated COVID-19 disease, which stands for Coronavirus 2019 disease. Following the progressive spread of the infection in other countries of the world, WHO declared the Pandemic on 11 March 2020. Italy was the first European country involved in the spread of the infection and among those with the highest number of victims. The Coronavirus responsible for COVID-19 has, as its main target organ, the respiratory system, being able to determine a serious acute respiratory syndrome similar to that of the cases found during the SARS epidemic of 2003: hence the name of the virus as SARS-CoV-2. The diagnosis of SARS-COV-2 infection is made by direct detection by PCR of viral RNA on different biological materials from patients with suspicious symptoms, and the first level diagnostic test is generally the nasopharyngeal swab. However, even if the specificity of the nasopharyngeal swab is high, its sensitivity can be affected by technical causes (sampling mode), as well as by intrinsic factors related to the method. The purpose of the study is to identify the clinical, laboratory and imaging characteristic which are similar or which can differentiate the hospitalized patients affected by COVID-19 pneumonia (with positive PCR on naso-pharyngeal swab) and patients with pneumonia with negative PCR for COVID-19. To do this, the investigators will compare the clinical, laboratory and imaging characteristics between interstitial pneumonia secondary to SARS-COV-2 infection, confirmed by molecular biology investigations (viral RNA research by PCR on nasopharyngeal swab) and cases of interstitial pneumonia negative to the nasopharyngeal swab.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In the late 2019 a new Coronavirus was identified as the cause of a group of atypical interstitial pneumonia cases in Wuhan, a city in the Chinese province of Hubei. In February 2020, the World Health Organization designated COVID-19 disease, which stands for Coronavirus 2019 disease. Following the progressive spread of the infection in other countries of the world, WHO declared the Pandemic on 11 March 2020. Italy was the first European country involved in the spread of the infection and among those with the highest number of victims. The Coronavirus responsible for COVID-19 has, as its main target organ, the respiratory system, being able to determine a serious acute respiratory syndrome similar to that of the cases found during the SARS epidemic of 2003: hence the name of the virus as SARS-CoV-2. Multisystem involvement and hyperinflammatory organ and systemic response are responsible for the patient's death. Overall, hospital mortality from COVID-19 is approximately 15% to 20%, but up to 40% among patients requiring ICU admission. The diagnosis of SARS-COV-2 infection is made by direct detection of viral RNA on different biological materials from patients with suspicious symptoms, and the first level diagnostic test is generally the nasopharyngeal swab; molecular investigations can also be carried out on samples from the distal respiratory tract (BronchoAlveolar Lavage, BAL). However, even if the specificity of the nasopharyngeal swab is high, its sensitivity can be affected by technical causes (sampling mode), as well as by intrinsic factors related to the method. The sensitivity data available are around 40-70%. The result is the possibility of a consistent series of false negatives (at least one third), represented by patients which have clinical characteristics compatible with SARS-COV-2 infection, but resulted, however, negative to the nasopharyngeal swab. These cases are framed as COVID-19-like cases and constitute a serious problem for the risk of not to recognize hospitalized patients suffering from COVID-19 infection.

The purpose of the study is to identify the clinical, laboratory and imaging characteristic which are similar or which can differentiate the hospitalized patients affected by COVID-19 pneumonia (with positive PCR on naso-pharyngeal swab) and patients with pneumonia with negative PCR for COVID-19. To do this, the investigators will compare the clinical, laboratory and imaging characteristics between interstitial pneumonia secondary to SARS-COV-2 infection, confirmed by molecular biology investigations (viral RNA research by PCR on nasopharyngeal swab) and cases of interstitial pneumonia negative to the nasopharyngeal swab. The cases studied will be represented by patients hospitalized for interstitial pneumonia in the participating hospital centers in the period between mid-March 2020 and end of May 2020. For these cases, all available data contained in the medical records of patients, enrolled within the time frame indicated above, will be retrospectively analyzed. Due to relative lack of sensitivity of COVID-19 PCR assay in nasopharyngeal swab, patients affected with COVID-19 infection can be mixed with other hospitalized patients and with unprotected health staff. On the basis of the comparison of the clinical, laboratory and imaging data the study would identify the characteristics which can differentiate patients with SARS-COV-2 pneumonia, confirmed by nasopharyngeal swab, and interstitial pneumonia and negative COVID-19 PCR on swab. The investigators aim to highlight any similarities or differences or the need for differentiated treatments.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • PA
      • Palermo, PA, Italy, 90146
        • Internal Medicine Division of the "Cervello-Villa Sofia" Hospital
      • Palermo, PA, Italy, 90146
        • Infectious diseases Unit of the "Cervello-Villa Sofia" Hospital
      • Palermo, PA, Italy, 90146
        • Pulmonology Unit Dedicated to COVID-19 Patients

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 95 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Retrospective, multicenter study, conducted on patients with interstitial pneumonia, admitted, consecutively, to the Internal Medicine I Unit of the "Villa Sofia - Cervello" Hospitals of Palermo, and two other Units dedicated to Patients affected with COVID-19, in the same hospital, from March 15, 2020 to May 31, 2020.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

All consecutive patients referred to the Emergency Unit of the "V. Cervello" Hospital, in Palermo, Italy, for clinical symptoms suggestive of suspected COVID-19 infection.

In details, we consider patients referred for one or more of the following manifestations: respiratory symptoms, fever, taste or smell loss.

To be included their records must include:

  • detailed clinical history
  • radiological findings (High-resolution CT, HRCT)
  • results of viral RNA research for SARS-COV2, by PCR on nasopharyngeal swab, repeated two times (at the admission and again after 48 hours from the admission in the Emergency Unit)
  • laboratory results regarding routine hemato-chemical assays
  • oxygen therapy
  • treatment used.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age <18 years
  • incomplete medical records with respect to the parameters sought

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
SARS-COV-2 PNEUMONIA CONFIRMED BY PCR ON NASOPHARYNGEAL SWAB
Hospitalized patients affected by COVID-19 interstitial pneumonia (with positive PCR on naso-pharyngeal swab)
Evaluation of the clinical, laboratory and imaging characteristics in patients with clinical presentation suggestive of COVID-19 infection, classified according to the results of PCR assay for COVID-19 on naso-pharyngeal swab as "COVID-19 patients" and "negative COVID-19 patients".
NEGATIVE SARS-COV-2 PNEUMONIA
Hospitalized patients affected by negative COVID-19 interstitial pneumonia (with negative PCR on naso-pharyngeal swab)
Evaluation of the clinical, laboratory and imaging characteristics in patients with clinical presentation suggestive of COVID-19 infection, classified according to the results of PCR assay for COVID-19 on naso-pharyngeal swab as "COVID-19 patients" and "negative COVID-19 patients".

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of the clinical characteristics of patients with clinical presentation suggestive of COVID-19 infection, classified according to the results of PCR assay as "COVID-19 patients" and "COVID-19 negative controls".
Time Frame: 75 Days
Accuracy of severity of respiratory insufficiency - evaluated as need of three step "nasal oxygen, oxygen mask, invasive ventilation" - in differentiate COVID-19 infection, classified according to the results of PCR assay for COVID-19 on naso-pharyngeal swab as "COVID-19 patients" and "COVID-19 negative controls"
75 Days
Evaluation of the laboratory characteristics of patients with clinical presentation suggestive of COVID-19 infection, classified according to the results of PCR assay as "COVID-19 patients" and "COVID-19 negative controls".
Time Frame: 75 Days
Accuracy of the association of 3 haemato-chemical abnormalities (lymphopenia + increased serum transaminases + increased serum LDH) in differentiate COVID-19 infection, classified according to the results of PCR assay for COVID-19 on naso-pharyngeal swab as "COVID-19 patients" and "COVID-19 negative controls".
75 Days
Evaluation of the imaging characteristics of patients with clinical presentation suggestive of COVID-19 infection, classified according to the results of PCR assay as "COVID-19 patients" and "COVID-19 negative controls".
Time Frame: 75 Days
Accuracy of thorax CT scan in differentiate COVID-19 infection, classified according to the results of PCR assay for COVID-19 on naso-pharyngeal swab as "COVID-19 patients" and "COVID-19 negative controls".
75 Days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of mortality of patients with clinical presentation suggestive of COVID-19 infection, classified according to the results of PCR assay as "COVID-19 patients" and "COVID-19 negative controls".
Time Frame: 75 Days
Evaluation of mortality in "COVID-19 patients" and "COVID-19 negative controls", hospitalized in the study period.
75 Days
Evaluation of clinical severity of patients with clinical presentation suggestive of COVID-19 infection, classified according to the results of PCR assay as "COVID-19 patients" and "COVID-19 negative controls".
Time Frame: 75 Days
Evaluation of clinical severity in "COVID-19 patients" and "COVID-19 negative controls", hospitalized in the study period.
75 Days
Evaluation of hospital stay length of patients with clinical presentation suggestive of COVID-19 infection, classified according to the results of PCR assay as "COVID-19 patients" and "COVID-19 negative controls".
Time Frame: 75 Days
Evaluation of hospital stay length in "COVID-19 patients" and "COVID-19 negative controls", hospitalized in the study period.
75 Days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 15, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 11, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Covid19

Clinical Trials on Clinical, laboratory and imaging characteristics of pneumonia

3
Subscribe