- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04546867
Establishing a Sonographic Based Algorithm to Verify Pancreatic Stent Position Placed to Prevent Post-ERCP Pancreatitis Before Endoscopic Removal
Sonographic Based Visualization Instead of X-ray of Pancreatic Stents Placed to Prenvent Post-ERCP Pancreatitis.
The present study is a prospective, single-center study. A total of 88 patients, who had placed a pancreatic stent for preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis, will be included in the study. Aim of the study is to establish a new algorithm based on a sonographic approach to remove the placed pancreatic stents. Another aim is to compare high-end sonographic devices with devices of medium price scale one's used on the ward.
On the day of removal of the pancreatic stent, all patients receive a sonography by an experienced investigator on the ward and by another, uninformed investigator with a high-end device. If a pancreatic stent is visualized in the pancreatic duct, the patient will have an esophagogastroduodenoscopy to remove the pancreatic stent. If sonography cannot find a pancreatic stent in the pancreatic duct an x-ray will be performed as suggested by the European and international guidelines. If the pancreatic stent spontaneously dislocated into the small bowel tract according to x-ray, no further investigation will be performed. If a stent is visulized in situ by x-ray, it will be removed by endoscopyl.
Statistical analysis will be done in cooperation with the statistical biomedical institute oft he university hospital in Frankfurt.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Klinikum der J. W. Goethe-Universität
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- placement of prophylactic pancreatic stent to prevent post-ERCP-pancreatitis
- age of at least 18 years
- written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- diseases that prevent sonography, x-ray or esophagogastroduodenoscopy
- no given consent
- other indication for pancreatic stenting
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Other: Sonography arm
Sonography is being performed by expericenced investigators to visualize a pancreatic stent in the pancreatic duct.
If the stent is being visualized, an endoscopy will be performed to remove the stent.
Otherwise, x-ray will be needed to confirm the sonographic finding of a dislodged pancreatic stent with no further need of intervention.
If x-ray finds a pancreatic stent in situ opposingly to ultrasound, an endoscopy will be performed to confirm the stents position and eventually remove it.
|
As described above.
All patients start with an ultasound-based approach to visualize pancreatic stents position.
Depending on the findings, x-ray will be performed if no stent is visualized in the pancreatic duct or an esophagogastroduodenoscopy will be performed to remove the pancreatic stent and confirm sonographic findings if the pancreatic stent is displayed in situ.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Confirmation of a new algorithm to remove a prophylactic pancreatic stent placed to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis by using sonography as first approach and compare the findings statistically in a pivot table to x-ray and endoscopy.
Time Frame: The entire procedure will take place within one hour.
|
A new algorithm is supposed to be tested that starts with a sonography to display a pancreatic stent. If the pancreatic stent can be visualized in the pancreatic duct, an esophagogastroduodenoscopy will be performed directly to remove the stent. If the stent cannot be displayed by sonography, x-ray will be performed as commonly suggested by the European and international guidelines. Therefore, the main goal of the study is to implement sonography before further diagnostic modalities to confirm prophylactic pancreatic stents position in the pancreatic duct. |
The entire procedure will take place within one hour.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Comparison of the findings of high-end sonographic devices and the findings of medium prize sonographic devices used on the ward by using a pivot table.
Time Frame: Both will take place within 30 minutes.
|
There will be performed two different ultrasounds to confirm stents position by two different experienced investigators.
The results will be compared to the results of x-ray and/or endoscopy to evaluate the quality of high end to medium prize sonographic devices.
|
Both will take place within 30 minutes.
|
Univariate analysis of the baseline characteristics compared to the results of sonographic findings to evaluate risk factors of false sonographic findings by using a Case report form to collect the data.
Time Frame: The entire procedure will take place within one hour.
|
Baseline characteristics will be compared to the false-positive and false-negative results of sonography compared to the gold standard (x-ray/endoscopy)
|
The entire procedure will take place within one hour.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, Niro G, Valvano MR, Spirito F, Pilotto A, Forlano R. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Aug;102(8):1781-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01279.x. Epub 2007 May 17.
- Dumonceau JM, Kapral C, Aabakken L, Papanikolaou IS, Tringali A, Vanbiervliet G, Beyna T, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Hritz I, Mariani A, Paspatis G, Radaelli F, Lakhtakia S, Veitch AM, van Hooft JE. ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2020 Feb;52(2):127-149. doi: 10.1055/a-1075-4080. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
- Fan JH, Qian JB, Wang YM, Shi RH, Zhao CJ. Updated meta-analysis of pancreatic stent placement in preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jun 28;21(24):7577-83. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i24.7577.
- Denzer U, Beilenhoff U, Eickhoff A, Faiss S, Huttl P, In der Smitten S, Jakobs R, Jenssen C, Keuchel M, Langer F, Lerch MM, Lynen Jansen P, May A, Menningen R, Moog G, Rosch T, Rosien U, Vowinkel T, Wehrmann T, Weickert U; Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten. [S2k guideline: quality requirements for gastrointestinal endoscopy, AWMF registry no. 021-022]. Z Gastroenterol. 2015 Dec;53(12):E1-227. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-109598. Epub 2016 Jan 19. No abstract available. German.
- Tryliskyy Y, Bryce GJ. Post-ERCP pancreatitis: Pathophysiology, early identification and risk stratification. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2018 Jan;27(1):149-154. doi: 10.17219/acem/66773.
- Cheon YK, Cho KB, Watkins JL, McHenry L, Fogel EL, Sherman S, Lehman GA. Frequency and severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis correlated with extent of pancreatic ductal opacification. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Mar;65(3):385-93. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.10.021.
- Loloi J, Lipkin JS, Gagliardi EM, Levenick JM. Assessing spontaneous passage of prophylactic pancreatic duct stents by X-ray: is a radiology report adequate? Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Jul 16;12:2631774519862895. doi: 10.1177/2631774519862895. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
- Sieg A, Hachmoeller-Eisenbach U, Eisenbach T. Prospective evaluation of complications in outpatient GI endoscopy: a survey among German gastroenterologists. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 May;53(6):620-7. doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.114422.
- ASGE Standards of Practice Committee; Ben-Menachem T, Decker GA, Early DS, Evans J, Fanelli RD, Fisher DA, Fisher L, Fukami N, Hwang JH, Ikenberry SO, Jain R, Jue TL, Khan KM, Krinsky ML, Malpas PM, Maple JT, Sharaf RN, Dominitz JA, Cash BD. Adverse events of upper GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Oct;76(4):707-18. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.03.252. No abstract available.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- FRA-UNI-PANCSTENT-2020
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Ultrasound
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkCompletedUltrasound Training | Ultrasound Simulation | Ultrasound Assessment | Technology-enhanced Learning | Virtual Reality SimulationDenmark
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedTrans Abdominal Ultrasound | Transvaginal Ultrasound | Lower Uterine Segment ThicknessEgypt
-
Mahidol UniversityRecruitingLearning Curve | Gastric Ultrasound | Novel in Gastric UltrasoundThailand
-
Tan Tock Seng HospitalRecruiting
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenCompleted
-
Brooke Army Medical CenterCompleted
-
Emergency Medical Service of the Central Bohemian...The Society of General Practice, J. E. Purkyne Czech Medical Association; Institute...Recruiting
-
IntelligentUltrasound LimitedCompleted
-
Seoul National University HospitalCompleted
Clinical Trials on Sonographic based visualization of a pancreatic stent
-
Karolinska University HospitalUniversity Hospital, Linkoeping; Lund University Hospital; Sahlgren´s University... and other collaboratorsUnknownHealing Time of Post Operative Pancreatic FistulasSweden
-
Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceNot yet recruitingEach Endoscopic Intervention Using X-raysFrance
-
Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SwedenRecruitingDrainage | Pancreatic PseudocystSweden
-
AdventHealthWithdrawnPancreatic Cyst | Pancreatic Fluid CollectionsUnited States
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisMinistry of Health, FranceCompletedDysfunction of the Prosthetic Conduct | Lesions of the Right Ventricular Outflow TractFrance
-
University of PalermoRecruitingEndometriosis | Ultrasound Therapy; Complications | Endometriosis; BowelGermany
-
Stryker NeurovascularActive, not recruitingIntracranial AneurysmUnited Kingdom, France, Finland, Switzerland, Italy, Germany, Austria
-
Tel Hai CollegeEnrolling by invitationBody Image | Self Esteem
-
University Hospital, SaarlandCompletedCoronary Artery DiseaseGermany
-
Spanish Society of CardiologyUnknownCoronary Artery Disease | Diabetes MellitusSpain